Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is not true. A Mason, Robert Mills, designed it -From wikipedia:President Washington was invited to dedicate the laying of the cornerstone. Masons did not build the monument, own it, or have any other part in the project.
I had in mind whoever designed and whoever approved the design of that building.
President Washington was invited to dedicate the laying of the cornerstone. Masons did not build the monument, own it, or have any other part in the project as we know it. Mills design was not used.
Albion, I think your defensive posture is keeping you from objectively assessing the facts. The signs of Masonry are all over the Washington Monument
Great.and in fact the entire city of Washington DC.
It's my understanding that Mills' proposed design was not the one used. If that's not the case, so what?
Do you have anything important to ask about Masonry that I can help with?
Construction of the monument began in 1848, but was halted from 1854 to 1877, and finally completed in 1884. The hiatus in construction happened because of co-option by the Know Nothing party, a lack of funds, and the intervention of the American Civil War. A difference in shading of the marble, visible approximately 150 feet (46 m) or 27% up, shows where construction was halted. Its original design was by Robert Mills, an architect of the 1840s, but his design was modified significantly when construction resumed. The cornerstone was laid on July 4, 1848; the capstone was set on December 6, 1884, and the completed monument was dedicated on February 21, 1885.[7] It officially opened October 9, 1888.
And finally, we read from Wikipedia that Robert Mills Obelisk continued to be built:The society held a competition for designs in 1836. The winner, architect Robert Mills, was well qualified for the commission. The citizens of Baltimore had chosen him to build a monument to Washington, and he had designed a tall Greek column surmounted by a statue of the President. Mills also knew the capital well, having just been chosen Architect of Public Buildings for Washington.
His design called for a tall obelisk—an upright, four-sided pillar that tapers as it rises—with a nearly flat top. He surrounded the obelisk with a circular colonnade, the top of which would feature Washington standing in a chariot. Inside the colonnade would be statues of 30 prominent Revolutionary War heroes.
One part of Mills' elaborate design that was built was the doorway surmounted by an Egyptian-style Winged sun. It was removed when construction resumed after 1884. A photo can be seen in The Egyptian Revival by Richard G. Carrot.[19]
Criticism of Mills' design and its estimated price tag of more than $1 million ($21,100,000 in 2010 US$[16])[20] caused the society to hesitate. Its members decided to start building the obelisk, and to leave the question of the colonnade for later. They believed that if they used the $87,000 they had already collected to start work, the appearance of the monument would spur further donations that would allow them to complete the project.
It was used, but altered. Read it again.As your own material makes clear, Mills' original design--as I said--was not used.
quote Yeshuasavedme:
And finally, we read from Wikipedia that Robert Mills Obelisk continued to be built:
Story submitted a design for the Washington Monument, then under construction. Although the Washington National Monument Society concluded that his design seemed "vastly superior in artistic taste and beauty" to the obelisk already under construction, the obelisk continued to be built, and is what we see today as the monument. ...
In addition, Story sculpted a bronze statue of Joseph Henry on the Mall in Washington, D.C., the scientist who served as the Smithsonian Institution's first Secretary. His Libyan Sibyl is on display at the Smithsonian Museum of American Art.
It was used, but altered. Read it again.
Washington Monument, which features pagan deities as on other Masonic buildings.
The wikipedia sites, link by link, tell the story -and what a story it is, for those who want to follow the history of it.In other words, it wasn't used. I am familiar with that design, and this report somewhat generally describes what is was going to look like but probably not enough for you to picture it in your mind. It was quite different from the obelisk we know as the Washington Monument.
Just for fun, let's have pictures of those "pagan deities" in or on the Washington Monument so we can all see what you're talking about.
The wikipedia sites, link by link, tell the story -and what a story it is, for those who want to follow the history of it.
Yes, the Mason architect's design was used
and the building was going on when circumstances caused the building of it to cease, not finished. The Mills design was begun, and altered
when it was taken up again...that is why the stones are two colors, not matching on the lower and upper parts.
No, they weren't. The structure wasn't built by the fraternity; it isn't ownned by the fraternity; it wasn't designed by the fraternity; and it isn't maintained by the fraternity. The only reason Masons have contributed so generously to the restoration of the monument is because it is a monument dedicated to George Washington, the most famous of American Masons.The thing is that the Freemasons were involved in the total project from the beginning to the now, even, in the restoration of it.
No. They weren't.You changed your point of attack in that you first said that Freemasons had nothing to do with the design or building of it, and by just checking wikipedia, we find they were involved in it from the beginning.
Front of the Grotto Room of the George Washington Masonic National Memorial. Photo by Ben Schumin on March 8, 2003.
This is not a picture of any part of the Washington Monument.
Yes. I gave the link and said the same.Not the Washington Monument but this: George Washington Masonic National Memorial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not the Washington Monument but this: George Washington Masonic National Memorial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<snip> This is, of course, a different building.
Albeit a Masonic Lodge... full of pagan symbolism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?