G4m wrote
Free will is something I don't believe in anymore. My view is that our 'choices' are simply manifestations of God's plan and creation. Belief has been already determined:
Try this.
Your choice to not believe in freewill anymore was an act of freewill in itself.
As for reconciling the doctrine of predestination with the doctrine of freewill, try this:
Eons ago, in eternity past when God decided to create the universe and God laid out His plan for the human race in the beginning -- He looked ahead and saw (foreknew) the decisions we would make and foreordained (predestined) it to be so. The choices we make are ours, but the plan is His.
Hence, those who were ordained to eternal life believed (Acts 13.48) just as God knew they would.
Consider this:
If God has already arbitraily chosen those who will be saved/lost, what is the point of evangelism and the motivation for missions? Why would Paul and the Apostles leave home and family, sacrifice everything and lay down their lives for something which does not require any effort on their part?
It seems that hyper-Calvinism subscribes to a Christianized form of pagan fatalism. If we have no choice in our eternal destiny then we become a victim of fate. Life becomes pointless and we must resign ourself to it.
Furthermore, how could God (or anyone) love a robot (I enjoy my toys but I dont love them) or how could we be commanded to love Him if, in fact, we are robots who have no choice in the matter?
If we are pre-programmed to have faith in God, how is it, then, that faith pleases God (Heb. 11.6).
To hyper-Calvinists life is presented as a sinister and capricious game God is playing with His creation, creating some to life everlasting and some to eternal damnation. Why?
Fact is, the so-called doctrine of freewill has been a central doctrine of the Christian church and the freewill-predestination debate has been a part of Christian history since its beginning. For example:
110-165AD Justin Martyr "We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, chastisements, and rewards are rendered according to the merit of each man's actions. Otherwise, if all things happen by fate, then nothing is in our own power. For if it be predestined that one man be good and another man evil, then the first is not deserving of praise or the other to be blamed. Unless humans have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions-whatever they may be.... For neither would a man be worthy of reward or praise if he did not of himself choose the good, but was merely created for that end. Likewise, if a man were evil, he would not deserve punishment, since he was not evil of himself, being unable to do anything else than what he was made for." (Justin First Apology chap. 43)
185-255 AD Origen "He makes Himself known to those who, after doing all that their powers will allow, confess that they need help from Him." (Origen Against Celsus bk. 7, chap. 42)
190 AD Clement of Alexandria "A man by himself working and toiling at freedom from sinful desires achieves nothing. But if he plainly shows himself to be very eager and earnest about this, he attains it by the addition of the power of God. God works together with willing souls. But if the person abandons his eagerness, the spirit from God is also restrained. To save the unwilling is the act of one using compulsion; but to save the willing, that of one showing grace." (Clement Salvation of the Rich Man chap. 21)
190 AD Clement of Alexandria "Neither praise nor condemnation, neither rewards nor punishments, are right if the soul does not have the power of choice and avoidance, if evil is involuntary." (Clement Miscellanies bk. 1, chap. 17)
250-300 AD Archelaus "All the creatures that God made, He made very good. And He gave to every individual the sense of free will, by which standard He also instituted the law of judgment.... And certainly whoever will, may keep the commandments. Whoever despises them and turns aside to what is contrary to them, shall yet without doubt have to face this law of judgment.... There can be no doubt that every individual, in using his own proper power of will, may shape his course in whatever direction he pleases." (Archelaus Disputation With Manes sees. 32, 33)
260-315 AD Methodius "Those [pagans] who decide that man does not have free will, but say that he is governed by the unavoidable necessities of fate, are guilty of impiety toward God Himself, making Him out to be the cause and author of human evils. " (Methodius The Banquet of the Ten Virgins discourse 8, chap. 16)
There are many online sources presenting both sides of the freewill/predestination debate. Check them out and take your [freewill] choice.
~Jim