• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Andrewn

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Jul 4, 2019
5,846
4,331
-
✟724,827.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I enjoyed reading your messages but still think there is a lot of similarity w/ Wesleyan Arminianism. They're not identical, but they are close enough; sometimes, using different expressions for similar ideas. As I'm getting more familiar with the Lutheran expressions, I like them better.

1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless [innocency] obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.
Universal Atonement. I'm sure Arminians agree.

Similar to the Arminian Prevenient Grace.

4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.
Sounds like the Arminian Resistible Grace / synergistic conversion. We are not completely passive.

Sounds like Wesleyan theology.

8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.
I like the fact that salvation is clearly stated as an ongoing process. This is not clearly expressed in Arminianism but is implied due to the possibility of falling from grace.


Clearly, Lutherans do not like the idea of Conditional election. But they don't like the Calvinist idea of Unconditional election, either. It seems that Lutherans leave the mechanism of election as a mystery expressed in accepting God's grace, which is wise.

Many people like to stress differences and divisions. By nature, I don't belong in this group and prefer to stress the similarity between categories.

Since the Formula of Concord is published before Arminianism came into the picture, perhaps Arminianism should be considered a modification of Lutheranism .
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,532
29,043
Pacific Northwest
✟812,781.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

There is an expression one will find in Lutheran circles, Crux Theologorum, the theologian's cross. There are places in Scripture which say one thing, and places in Scripture which say another.

The essence of it is that we take what Scripture says about predestination and election, we take what Scripture says about God's desire that all be saved, we take what Scripture says about that not all will be saved and simply affirm all these things without trying to make them all fit together neatly in a systematic way.

It is a cross for the theologian, because we simply have to say, "God has spoken, thanks be to God". It may not be possible for us to reconcile them in a tidy, rational theological box.

That is what ultimately leads us to reject both Calvinism and Arminianism. From the Lutheran POV both Calvinism and Arminianism are systematic theologies that attempted to systematize Scripture, but in doing so there are rejections or, at the very least, glosses over important biblical teaching.

Calvinism, for example, denies Universal Atonement and rejects the reality that one can fall away from the faith.
Arminianism, for example, denies Unconditional Election (something Lutherans do believe) and downplays Total Inability.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0