• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Fossils ?

TheBeardedDude

The Fossil Dude(tm)
May 7, 2013
652
12
Connecticut
✟1,114.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I would be interested to know how many real fossils as a rule,like human fossils or donosaur fossils you have found just lying around that you have been lucky to stumble across - twinc

I've never collected hominid fossils, but I have collected tools like arrowheads.

My shelf beside my desk is full of fossils though. I have gastroliths from dinosaurs that I collected in the Morrison Fm in Wyoming, some other gastroliths I collected from the Morrison in Arizona, a clam from the Coon Creek Fm just outside of Parsons, TN that is from the Cretaceous, gastropods and brachiopods from the Hamilton Fm in New York, and a chunk of rock that contains mainly bryozoans from the Devonian Ross Fm also near Parsons, TN.

These are just some of the fossils I have in my office for teaching purposes and for demonstration. And this list is also limited to the ones I have personally collected.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
after,all else is said and done ad infinitum and ad absurdum ,the fact of the matter is that the vast majority of fossils are found,as if suddenly buried in sedimentary rock layers laid down by water all over the earth = 75% of the earths surface - twinc

Anoxic aquatic environments are the most conducive to fossilization, so it is hardly surprising that most of the fossils we have come from environments that are most conducive to fossilization. Even though there were billions of passenger pigeons at one time, we only have a handful of passenger pigeon fossils.

Also, finding fossils from past aquatic environments in no way indicates a global flood.
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Anoxic aquatic environments are the most conducive to fossilization, so it is hardly surprising that most of the fossils we have come from environments that are most conducive to fossilization. Even though there were billions of passenger pigeons at one time, we only have a handful of passenger pigeon fossils.

Also, finding fossils from past aquatic environments in no way indicates a global flood.
In fact, isn't the fossil record quite heavily biased towards creatures that lived in or near water? That should not be the case if it was all buried by a flood that covered everything.
 
Upvote 0

TheBeardedDude

The Fossil Dude(tm)
May 7, 2013
652
12
Connecticut
✟1,114.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
In fact, isn't the fossil record quite heavily biased towards creatures that lived in or near water? That should not be the case if it was all buried by a flood that covered everything.

It's also biased towards organisms with hard parts. The soft-bodied faunas are rare. If a flood had deposited all of it, there should be a lot of soft-bodied material.
 
Upvote 0

twinc

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2011
778
5
Wirral
✟1,281.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In fact, isn't the fossil record quite heavily biased towards creatures that lived in or near water? That should not be the case if it was all buried by a flood that covered everything.

it was not the flood water that buried the dead things but the sediment carried by the flood water - twinc
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
it was not the flood water that buried the dead things but the sediment carried by the flood water - twinc


Even so there should be many more land animals and also many soft bodied animal castings if they were deposited by your "flood sediments". Worse yet the sorting of fossils cannot be explained by any creationist mechanisms. Yet they fit the evolutionary paradigm perfectly.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
it was not the flood water that buried the dead things but the sediment carried by the flood water - twinc

How do you know that, and how do you differentiate between normal marine sediment, normal non-marine aquatic sediment and Flood sediment?
 
Upvote 0

TheBeardedDude

The Fossil Dude(tm)
May 7, 2013
652
12
Connecticut
✟1,114.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Ever seen pictures of the Checkerboard Mesa in Zion National Park? That is an example of a terrestrial sand dune deposit. So, sedimentary does not equal deposition by water. It means either means physical components of another preexisting rock that have been eroded, transported, and deposited by some means (such as wind, water, or gravity) that are then compacted and cemented together (although sometimes, like for the checkerboard mesa, there is no cement and the grains are just held in a pressure solution.)

There is another type of sedimentary rock called a chemical sedimentary rock which is the result of mineral deposition either in a fluid medium or from the evaporation of a fluid medium. So, salt deposits like those underneath Syracuse, NY (called Salt City for a reason) that are the result of ancient evaporation.


Checkerboard_Mesa_in_Zion_National_Park.jpeg
 
Upvote 0

twinc

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2011
778
5
Wirral
✟1,281.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Ever seen pictures of the Checkerboard Mesa in Zion National Park? That is an example of a terrestrial sand dune deposit. So, sedimentary does not equal deposition by water. It means either means physical components of another preexisting rock that have been eroded, transported, and deposited by some means (such as wind, water, or gravity) that are then compacted and cemented together (although sometimes, like for the checkerboard mesa, there is no cement and the grains are just held in a pressure solution.)

There is another type of sedimentary rock called a chemical sedimentary rock which is the result of mineral deposition either in a fluid medium or from the evaporation of a fluid medium. So, salt deposits like those underneath Syracuse, NY (called Salt City for a reason) that are the result of ancient evaporation.


Checkerboard_Mesa_in_Zion_National_Park.jpeg

via google just type in [Flood/Sedimentary rock layers]click and take your pick - wincam
 
Upvote 0