Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There would be none in terms of fossils etc. it is after the flood.
But a point to note is we do see big cats and canines in tundra regions.
What flood waters?I went away and read up on the anatomy of the pterosaur https://pterosaur.net/flight.php and it seems due to thier size and wing span they need to use all four limbs to take flight. It is highly likely in a sediment filled flood water it would be unable to take off. It needs to forcefully push down in a springboard action to start flight. In muddy flood waters it would not be able to do this.
Assuming that all pterosaurs started o the ground when it began raining - which sounds like a stupid thing to assume, but okay - on what do you base the likelihood that pterosaurs would have trouble jumping in slightly muddy water? Any tests? Any data? Anything at all?
Because, frankly, it comes off like you're just grasping at straws.
Fossils can and do develop outside of flood conditions. Tar pits, as an example.
So? Big cats and dogs are found all over the world. Besides, you're not just talking about cats and dogs, but all predators. There's no evidence of any massive northern migration of animals.
What evidence do you have of floodwaters 65 million years ago?The pterosaur died at the time the dinosaurs did at this point the flood waters are not slightly shallow, they are in fact quite deep.
So? Big cats and dogs are found all over the world. Besides, you're not just talking about cats and dogs, but all predators. There's no evidence of any massive northern migration of animals.
The pterosaur died at the time the dinosaurs did at this point the flood waters are not slightly shallow, they are in fact quite deep. If you have a chance read that article on thier ability to fly.
Unlikely...based on what?You can make up your own mind. As for already flying ones they may well have remained alive above the flood waters. Once the flood waters were deep they would unlikely even if they died be engulfed in sediment.
Why would you expect to see one. In a young earth theory we are only talking about 1000 of years, in that time the meat eaters would have initially moved north then migrated back as heards and other food sources built up. But I will do some research to see if their is any evidence.
Lucky you guys get me to research. There is evidence of this migration. In the past there were very big cats much larger than the ones we have today. Obviously the bigger the cat the more food it needs. It was said these cats lived at the same time as man. And it is said they all died during the ice age. They died in icy environments. Why would massive cats prefer ice to the lush plains of the tropics only one reason there was more food in the ice. http://listverse.com/2010/12/02/10-huge-prehistoric-cats/
Where/when do you believe they came out of the ark? What time span and present-day location?You have entirely missed my point I am talking post flood. When the animals came out of the ark. Frozen areas to the North would preserve food sources... Like putting your meat in the freezer does. I am saying for a time after the flood Carnivora would have migrated north, to get food.
From where to where? And when?Lucky you guys get me to research. There is evidence of this migration.
I read it. There wasn't anything to suggest that muddy waters would stop them from flying.
Because animals leave evidence where they go. We can track migration of animals in the past. And there is nothing to suggest that, at any point, all the carnivores moved up north to eat thawing, frozen carcasses. Animals have never been observed to behave like that.
Even during the ice age, the planet wasn't covered in ice, and there's no evidence they died because of the cold. Even today, there are plenty of big cats and carnivores living in icy environments. Polar bears, snow leopards, et centers. You can find carnivores in all sorts of environments.
Due to their weight distribution they needed all four limbs to create a spring action. In mud filled waters, how would they create this action. The four limbs are pushing aganst what?
But like I showed there is evidence large carnivores were in colder regions.
I'm not saying it wasn't colder, but it's not like animals can't live in cold climates.Why then did scientist say they died during the ice age if it was not significantly colder.
My point is not that the cold killed them. My point was that the after flood food source meat, could have been preserved in the icy environment.
Previously I stated carnivores would have been led to colder regions due the the longivity of the food source. Less rot in frozen carcasses, deposited by the flood. Their death was probably due to reduction in food supply.
Killing off the big cats with higher diary needs and leaving the small ones alive.
But like I showed there is evidence large carnivores were in colder regions. Why then did scientist say they died during the ice age if it was not significantly colder.
My point is not that the cold killed them. My point was that the after flood food source meat, could have been preserved in the icy environment. Previously I stated carnivores would have been led to colder regions due the the longivity of the food source. Less rot in frozen carcasses, deposited by the flood. Their death was probably due to reduction in food supply. Killing off the big cats with higher diary needs and leaving the small ones alive.
Then get into the field, write a paper, and try to get it published in a peer-reviewed journal. Until you succeed in doing that and change the mainstream narrative of Earth's history, you have no credibility. You have to gain the same amount of knowledge and put in the same amount of work as the experts to even pretend to know better than them. It blows my mind when people on here expect other people to accept them as a rightful authority on a certain matter and to reject the research of nearly everyone who is actually in the relevant field.I could have this all wrong, but this is, is my reasoning.
Where in that post was there anything that would fall under even a loose definition of cussing?Rather than cuss me out, tell me where my reasoning is wrong, i am open to learn, I want to refine my ideas....
The large 'megafauna' that you are referring to didn't die 'during' the ice age, they died as and shortly after the ice age ended. Bit of a difference.
There was plenty of food up in the northern cold environs. They were not however 'on the ice.' They were up in the great steppes that were south of the glaciers. These were not barren empty landscapes of frozen corpses. These were vibrant pieces of land filled with life of all kinds, shapes and sizes. Plant life and animal life in tremendous quantity.
...the ground.
Have you never stepped in mud? Does it make you incapable of jumping? It's not quicksand.
Which nobody is denying. There's a bit of a difference between that and saying ALL PREDATORS WERE IN THE NORTH.
This is no problem at all for my model. Ofter the flood thier may well have been a lot of ash in the atmosphere blocking the suns rays resulting in a closer climate. It is possible this activity lasted for some time as fault lines settled. As for the abundance of life in thaws times that is no problem either. How do we tell what life was there by dead animal and forms a there was a lot of that lying around AFTER the flood.
something you have completely ignored
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater
http://www.livescience.com/50414-chicxulub-crater-drilling.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?