Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It does. We can identify many sedimentary rocks deposited during a flood. For example: a shale.
Hi Juven...been a while since last we spoke. Have a question for you: What makes you think that a 3 meter per hour increase in water depth wouldn't cause significant waves? Every instance of such massive increases in water volume that I am aware of has been rather devastating.
You know as well as I do that shale is produced by calm waters. How can that possibly be the case in floods of Biblical proportions?
Good thinking.
But there will be a lot of sedimentary material after the flood.
A minor example is the rising of Mississippian River flood water at, for example, Memphis, TN. The river flow appears to be normal, but the water level will keep rising for a few days.
Water gushed out from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge will not cause a single wave at New York. The sea level will only rise quietly.
A lot of mud will be deposited in the ocean after the Flood.
That's a fabulous pic. Just look at it...how can you NOT see that it was slowly eroded over time? It's simply obvious to me. In addition to the meandering, if it happened suddenly in the flood, why are the sidewalls not sheared?
1. Never does it reach anywhere near 3 meters per hour.
2. You are comparing localized water increases to a flood which supposedly spanned the whole world. Your comment about a localized increase not affecting an area outside of that locale is completely irrelevant. Your hypothetical 3 meter rise would affect ALL locales, since it was an allegedly GLOBAL occurrence.
It is not that simple. Meandering process does not show when river flows on bedrock.
I'm disappointed, Juve. It seems that you are continually growing farther and farther from your geologic educational roots. It used to be that your biggest fault was that you were non-committal when it came to dating the age of the earth. Which is fair enough. You didn't want to pin a number. Now, you are arguing about shale being part of the flood deposit, when you KNOW that it goes against everything that geology teaches.
You mentioned that the flood would have left plenty of fine sediment to settle and become shale. Well, yes, but there are MANY layers which we find ON TOP OF and IN BETWEEN shale layers in the geologic record.
Shale is one of many smoking guns in favor of flood-deniers, including evaporites, paleosols, coccalithofores, and many others.
It is only a scale problem. I did not calculate. May be someone should do that.
So? I don't see how would other layers of rocks interfere the arguments about the Flood.
The meandering, to me, is a secondary observation. The point of my post was to identify the stepped nature of the sidewalls.
How can there be multiple shale layers separated by other sedimentary (and subarial igneous) layers in a single flood?
It is not only a scale problem. You introduced an argument which included one locale not being affected by the water rise. In a global flood, no locales are unaffected.
That is the feature not clear to me.
Why would the width of the channel continue to shrink? And it seems the steep wall should be on the outside of the curve.
That is because you have been spewing nonsense and no nothing of this science at all.It seems to be one of you favorite argument. But I don't see any relevance of this feature to the Global Flood.
That's a fabulous pic. Just look at it...how can you NOT see that it was slowly eroded over time? It's simply obvious to me. In addition to the meandering, if it happened suddenly in the flood, why are the sidewalls not sheared?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?