• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

forced sterilization

Ledifni

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2004
3,464
199
44
✟4,590.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
loriersea said:
The right at issue is the right to bodily integrity. Bodily integrity is not a privilege, and forced sterilization is a violation of bodily integrity. Most people would not believe that, after a person steals a certain number of times, we should cut off their hands, or that after a child runs away from home a certain number of times, we should cut off their legs.

No, because hands and legs can be used for many things other than stealing or running away (not that I believe a child who runs away has really committed a crime). Punishments like that are cruel and unusual, done for the purpose of terror and vengeance rather than to correct a social ill.

Forced sterilization, on the other hand, leaves a person completely functional except for one difference: they can't do the thing that was causing harm to begin with. They can't procreate.

But the right to bodily integrity is regularly violated by our society every day. We alter and manipulate the bodies of the criminally insane; we perform surgeries against the patient's will in many cases; we prevent suicide and drug use because we think it's harmful to the patient. Why don't these same considerations apply in the case of child welfare?

loriersea said:
I believe that bodily integrity is a fundamental right, and forced sterilization would be interfering with that. That is not to say that requiring someone to be on a semi-permanent birth control method, like an IUD or Depo shots, until they can prove they are capable of raising a child, is a bad thing, providing that person has proven to be incapable of making responsible procreative and childrearing decisions that have adversely affected their current children. But, to forcibly remove someone's ovaries is another issue altogether.

I'm certainly not talking about removing somebody's ovaries. That would have major adverse affects on her health aside from the inability to procreate. I'm talking about tubal ligation or other less-invasive procedures. IUD would definitely be an option providing the patient couldn't remove it herself.
 
Upvote 0

skipper

Senior Veteran
Aug 21, 2005
3,439
163
56
Md
✟34,416.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I missed a post a while back snowyde2003 said forced sterilization was barberic, my answer to this is isn't putting doornobs on backwards so you can lock children in a room for hour upon hour barberic, what about putting a 5 year old in a baby crib with a lid on it, I could give you a list of things that happened to these specific children that were so much more barberic. Shouldn't they have a punishment, should they be allowed to keep doing these things. They only do it until the child is old enough to tell and then they give them away to the state before the state has a chance to take the child. Once the children are given away then someone hopefully can help them so far with these children the parents have been fairly successful, they will always have problems but they are working on them. What about the next group of children what if they aren't as successful in healing. Do you actually want this person living next to you or perhaps becoming your son or daughter in law. Its a cycle that we need to brake someway.
 
Upvote 0

knightlight72

Soldier of Christ
Dec 11, 2003
879
42
54
Canada
✟1,253.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Tangnefedd said:
They are having babies for a reason. Only God gives children to us. It is His gift, and ultimately, we don't have any say in it. So respctfully, we have no say in this. We can deal with it, if the parents can't handle it.

Well if that is the case,:scratch: :scratch: :scratch: God better wise up and stop sending babies to people who can't handle them!!!!!
I wasn't sure if you are serious. But do you feel God isn't the creator of all life?

Do you feel God doesn't know what he's doing?
 
Upvote 0

knightlight72

Soldier of Christ
Dec 11, 2003
879
42
54
Canada
✟1,253.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
skipper said:
I have been touched by these children I adopted one and will take the rest when the time comes and because I know that the time will come. But Iam fairly sure that even if the next group of children are placed in care the parents will continue to have children. She is only 34 so if she continues to produce children at the rate in which she is, she could produce an additional 10 children or possible more. How can you say that this is her right. I do not believe that God thinks this is right. God gave us free will but it doesn't make Him responsible that these people keep having babies that they don't care for, anymore than it makes Him responsible for the fact that someone murders people.
God creates life. I am not saying God wants us to let children suffer. But I am saying that we do not have a right to stop life that God wants to be born.
 
Upvote 0

Exhausted

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2005
2,544
130
Earth
✟3,462.00
Faith
Christian
knightlight72 said:
God creates life. I am not saying God wants us to let children suffer. But I am saying that we do not have a right to stop life that God wants to be born.
Well, technically, no one should have the right to have consensual, homosexual sex, according to the church. I don't believe that stopped anyone.
 
Upvote 0

Lycaenidae

Well-Known Member
Jul 24, 2005
970
67
45
✟31,461.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Monica02 said:
Since the begining of time - the Church has always taught this. Now some people refuse to believe Church teaching - but the Church still teaches that sterilization is wrong.

Well, the church needs to wake up and smell the overpopulation.
 
Upvote 0

Ledifni

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2004
3,464
199
44
✟4,590.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Monica02 said:
The Christian Church.

Monica, I understand why you're putting it this way, since you believe as you do, but you should face the practical situation in the world. You may believe that you are still the one and only valid Church, but the fact is that there are many, many other churches than just yours. Whether they are heretical is a completely different question that has nothing to do with their existence.

So for the sake of everybody here, to reduce confusion and pointless dialogue, will you please just bite the bullet and call it "the Roman Catholic Church?" Please?
 
Upvote 0

Monica02

Senior Veteran
Aug 17, 2004
2,568
152
✟3,547.00
Faith
Catholic
Ledifni said:
Monica, I understand why you're putting it this way, since you believe as you do, but you should face the practical situation in the world. You may believe that you are still the one and only valid Church, but the fact is that there are many, many other churches than just yours. Whether they are heretical is a completely different question that has nothing to do with their existence.

So for the sake of everybody here, to reduce confusion and pointless dialogue, will you please just bite the bullet and call it "the Roman Catholic Church?" Please?


All Christians are somehow connected to the Catholic Church, each in various degrees of communion. All Christians should understand that sterilization is wrong. I will refer to the Catholic Church as the Church if I wish.
 
Upvote 0

Yusuf Evans

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2005
10,057
611
Iraq
✟13,443.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
whitestar said:
Hey I agree! Though I will probably be yelled at by other Christians for agreeing...but geesh...the kids are taken due to abuse and neglect?



:mad: Seeing incidences of child abuse and endagerment tick me off. So, dont' worry Whitestar, more Christians are behind you than against about this issue. Children are a gift and blessing from the Lord, and for us to abuse that is unthinkable. They need to be locked away. As for the sterilization part, hey, they make pedophiles do it, why not abusive parents.
 
Upvote 0

Tangnefedd

A Liberal Christian
Feb 10, 2004
3,555
26
76
✟33,900.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I wasn't sure if you are serious. But do you feel God isn't the creator of all life?

Do you feel God doesn't know what he's doing?


I don't think God has any physical input into the world today, even if he kicked off evolution. If however he does, and he sends babies to folk who aren't capable of parenting them, then the old guy certainly doesn't know what he is doing and should hand over to someone who is a bit more clued up!:D
 
Upvote 0