loriersea said:The right at issue is the right to bodily integrity. Bodily integrity is not a privilege, and forced sterilization is a violation of bodily integrity. Most people would not believe that, after a person steals a certain number of times, we should cut off their hands, or that after a child runs away from home a certain number of times, we should cut off their legs.
No, because hands and legs can be used for many things other than stealing or running away (not that I believe a child who runs away has really committed a crime). Punishments like that are cruel and unusual, done for the purpose of terror and vengeance rather than to correct a social ill.
Forced sterilization, on the other hand, leaves a person completely functional except for one difference: they can't do the thing that was causing harm to begin with. They can't procreate.
But the right to bodily integrity is regularly violated by our society every day. We alter and manipulate the bodies of the criminally insane; we perform surgeries against the patient's will in many cases; we prevent suicide and drug use because we think it's harmful to the patient. Why don't these same considerations apply in the case of child welfare?
loriersea said:I believe that bodily integrity is a fundamental right, and forced sterilization would be interfering with that. That is not to say that requiring someone to be on a semi-permanent birth control method, like an IUD or Depo shots, until they can prove they are capable of raising a child, is a bad thing, providing that person has proven to be incapable of making responsible procreative and childrearing decisions that have adversely affected their current children. But, to forcibly remove someone's ovaries is another issue altogether.
I'm certainly not talking about removing somebody's ovaries. That would have major adverse affects on her health aside from the inability to procreate. I'm talking about tubal ligation or other less-invasive procedures. IUD would definitely be an option providing the patient couldn't remove it herself.
Upvote
0