Mmmmmmm... I'm having Cherry Garcia, thank you, HeatherJay.
I apoloigize for being blunt.

My remarks were not address to anyone in particular. I'm sorry if they were perceived in that way. To the best of my recolection, no one on this site said that they valued looks *above* personality, and that is what my remarks primarily discussed.
My illustration of how things can change in a marriage was intended as a reminder that even if we choose on looks, primarily or in part, or if our spouse chooses us on looks, those looks are not guaranteed, not even for the next week. It was certainly not a threat or a warning of what can happen to those who marry for looks. It is a statement of how temporal apperance is for all of us. When we talk about such things, people usually think about growing old and gray and wrinkled, but other things can happen to alter our apperance in the very near future.
I said:
Anyone who thinks looks are more important than personality deserves what they will get.
I stand by it. What I was thinking, and clearly did not begin to express well, is that people who marry primarily for looks will get exactly that - someone who looks great. Looks will not see a couple through raising kids, through financial hard times, through career setbacks and spititual droughts or serious illnesses and deaths, all of which most of us face in our lives. A pretty face and great bod, as pleasing as they are, just don't cut it when real life comes calling.
I am sorry to have caused a minor uproar or hurt feelilngs.
I am sorry, MrDude, if my poorly worded remarkes tempted you into making your snide comment about my personality.
Just kidding, Mr Dude.

Didn't want you to think I'd missed it!
I am far from bitter! I guess I was irked to find that people are still debating the apperance/personality issue. I should have just let this particular thread go by...