Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No? I'm content with the current design?
A great designer would have allowed for the current
design to work just as we find it?
Basically, LM, we would need to see all these things continuing to happen today. There are no "transitionals" in existence today, walking around with us. We have chimps and we have humans, but the only "evidence" we can gather for the in-betweens is remnants? Why'd they all have to go away?
I don't want to see a fossil attached to some supposed timeline. I want to see one of my "ancestors" that is not a homo sapien sapiens, and not a chimpanzee. Alive. Today. Instead, we have point A, and point L, but B-K are just fossils.
Big people have big brains. Small people have small brains. I still don't see the "size matters" logic involved here...if a midget outsmarts a 7' tall person on Jeopardy! would that falsify this claim?
So you agree that those fossils are transitional, and have gone extinct?
How could it be your ancestor from millions of years ago and still be alive? Are you saying that transitional hominids should be nearly immortal, and be able to live for millions of years?
Compare a modern human to a chimp. Get back to me.
What features would a fossil need in order for you to accept it as transitional between modern humans and a common ancestor shared with apes?
Here is the question again.
Would a common designer of the platypus, human, and duck make the platypus jaw more like a duck, or a human? What are your answers?
Is it your contention that the bill of the platypus should have more in common with a duck than a human? ?
Extinct, yes. Transitional...
But we still have chimps. You do maintain that those are our ancestors, yes?
Why have they survived this long while other transitionals - which were supposedly more evolved - died out long ago?
So we're no longer talking about just size now, correct?
No, I do not "contend - argument, claim, plea, submission, allegation, assertion, declaration;"
any changes. Why do you ask?
We can only accept precepts about the past on faith.
Fossils are evidence, so no faith required.
What features would a fossil need in order for you to accept it as transitional between modern humans and a common ancestor shared with apes?
Ya know...this is the second or third time someone's posted this thing, but what are they all? What is each one from A-L? Anyone can put together a bunch of skulls. Us "non-science believing" Creationists need a bit more info....
Your conclusion does require faith. Many transitional forms
have been faked and swallowed by people of faith, like you.
The people with less faith re-checked the evidence.
Let me help. When I create things in my woodshop I often make mockups using scrap wood. Even my first working models find their way into the scrap bin. It's only after several of such models that I refine my project and perfect it to my satisfaction.
There is no evidence for creation, .......
Except for all that stuff that looks like it's been created ( if it quacks like duck.........).
Except for all that stuff that looks like it's been created ( if it quacks like duck.........).
I still find it hilarious that you try to discredit evolution by making evolution look like your faith based beliefs. Why is that?
Do your woodshop creations fall into a nested hierarchy?
Because science is a philosophy.
I am merely removing the credit
that is is more than that.
And the tiny little category of evolution regarding
origins is so much less than science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?