Flight 93 Never Crashed In The Empty Shanksville Field

[mandyangel]

people acutally lost loved ones that day. we get that you don't like America. but what your doing is causing more pain to the families who were affected by 9/11. send all your nutty thoughts to the ACLU but not here.

 

[EdwinWillers]

The premise of this thread is absolutely absurd - on so many levels.

If you want to know what happens when a jet crashes at 480 MPH into a solid object, look at this video. Check out esp starting at about 3:45 into the film and again at 6:10 or so.

YouTube - Crash test of a F-4 Phantom

One word for the jet - disintegration.

One word for the premise of this thread - disintegrated.

 

[Trogdor the Burninator]

I miss these threads. It was fun watching the truthers get into ever crazier theories to explain obvious situations.

No the WTC didn't fall because of heat and damage, it was destroyed after teams of ninjas working over weeks snuck in and planted demolition charges throught the building so that it could be demiolished after terrorists flew a plane into it. And no-one ever saw them because they were like, ninjas man.

 

[Everlasting33]

It seems that individuals use conspiracy theories to dampen the blow or devastation of a tragedy as seen with 9/11 and the Holocaust. It's easier to say the government planned it than to admit human beings died for a lost, cruel and unfair cause.

 

[kathaksung]

You should re-read the last paragraph that you quoted from me.


I mentioned both of the pictures that you mentioned including as to why they are next to vegetation as well as not even smaller bits of shrapnel.

To say that the pieces are clean is absurd. The second picture (4) clearly shows extensive burn damage which would make since if an explosion blew the 'shell' off the plane.

The second picture is clean, but that is because we are looking at the outside of the plane. Any fiery explosion would have been the result of the fuel tanks which are located inside, therefore, the explosion would have come from the interior and not burn the exterior as substantially.

1. The big piece picture (3 and 4) were taken in somewhere else, never saw in whole scen picture. Most likely a make up to cover up.

2. The planes hit the WTC and Pentagon should have flew in same speed. Did you see the similar size debris? That's why they could only show you a part picture, which could be taken anywhere else.

3. It's bright and clean. No impact trace in background. It was placed there for photograph.

 

[TheNewWorldMan]

1. The big piece picture (3 and 4) were taken in somewhere else, never saw in whole scen picture. Most likely a make up to cover up.

2. The planes hit the WTC and Pentagon should have flew in same speed. Did you see the similar size debris? That's why they could only show you a part picture, which could be taken anywhere else.

3. It's bright and clean. No impact trace in background. It was placed there for photograph.

It was these guys:

Firing one of these:

From here:

To do this