- Oct 16, 2023
- 2,615
- 556
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
I'm easy. There is about a trillion a year spent on the military, maybe snag half of that to start?While, like most people, I am prone to lie on occassions, I have never knowingly done so any forum. I can't explain it. It is what it is.
Thank you for accompanying your assertion with a substantial body of research and data. Very useful. I'm sure you are aware that curing homelessness involves much more than just building more homes, but it is certainly a good start and, as you said, there would still be money left over.
We agree that more should be done to reduce and eventually eliminate homelessness. What we disagree about is where the money is to come from.
Great, we need a 'doge' to grab a lot of that waste too!You point to the space budget. I point - in US terms - to the cosmetics industry, with $50 billion a year catering to vanity and the pet industry at $152 billion a year, $65 billion of it on pet food. Now I grant you that pets can provide emotional support for many, can be educational for children, etc. but space research also offers benefits.
![]()
Beauty Industry Statistics 2025 (Cosmetic Market Size)
Uncover the latest beauty industry statistics. Explore trends in skincare, makeup, and haircare. Gain insights into consumer spending!www.demandsage.com
![]()
US pet food, treat industry amasses $65 billion in sales
The APPA released its “2025 State of the Industry Report,” detailing record-high sales for the US pet industry, growth in cat ownership, and evolving consumer purchasing trends.www.petfoodprocessing.net
No problem. ALL kinds of animals were created in a day! If some are not here when He comes, it is easy peasy to create new ones! As for God not allowing man to kill all mankind, that would not be 'evident' to the untrained eye (or even the trained eye)Of course. I know this is your position, but as we have already established, it is not mine. And may I say if God is limiting man's ability to kill all life on Earth it is not evident. We are probably wiping out species faster than we are recognising hitherto unidientified ones. Much of the research that you seem so negative about is targeted on countering this man-made extinction event.
There is no possibility of sinful men doing that. Only by having God inside of men can that happen. That will never happen until He returns to the planet to rule. Meanwhile the saved people with the Almighty inside of them are a minority. After He returns we will be the only ones on the planet.And I favour increasing our understanding of the world we live in, learning to live more harmoniously with out neighbours (which means everyone), respecting and supporting all other life on the planet.
I realize that all the good we wish for will remain pi in the sky until men accept Jesus. Man can't save himselfAchieve that I suspect you would find suprsiingly little evidence of sin. It seems to me some of our goals are the same, we just use a different vocabulary.
I do not trust men in the current sinful state of the world, no. History proves me correct. Is there some good done with research of things like covid and other plagues? Yes. Was that misused to grab power and oppress people? Yes. Can airplanes be good? We probably would say yes. Yet they dropped atomic bombs and killed hundreds of thousands of people, children and women and men. No matter what science comes along, we can rely on sinful men abusing it. therefore science is not the answer.I had moved on to talking about all forms of research, not just space research. I may be mistaken, but you seem negative about a lot of scientific endeavours.
India also is nuclear armed, no? If they get into it with Pakistan or China or etc, I suspect that the good from better crop yields (even if they were passed along to benefit the deplorables) would be greatly outweighed by the bad. There is no chance man will or can save himself. Period.Again, I had moved on to other types of research, but - as an example - India is achieving significant improvements in crop yields through satellite observations. People rendered homeless by natural disasters anywhere on the planet can be aided in recovery form satellite images.
Yes, they have 'deduced' that creation is not really creation, but a result of some invented long series of cosmic flukes and crashes and explosions etc!Would you provide your single best example of such misuse for discussion?
Actually I suspect the garden of Eden was near Israel. But I understand that you mean as far as science can tell.I was not speaking about the genetic manipulation of food, but our understanding of plant genetics which gives us the ability to enhance food value and yield by natural means. I am European, so I am well aware of the contrast between European and American regulations on food. (NB: When I say I am European I mean I am Scottish and English and British and, ultimately, African since that is the home continent for all of us.)
Having an ability to 'enhance' food probably also gives man the ability to tinker badly with food etc etc. Since man is fallen and in sin, we can bet that whatever science comes along, he will abuse it. The problem is the human heart, not in more or less science advances.
The US is not 'my' government. I have no expectations of a lot of good from them either. Mankind is fallen and in sin, and it would probably be a waste of time and breath to ask them to be good. But whatever they all do, it can be known that it is not saving us or of God.I have never been a fan of NASA's ability to get things done economically. If you wish you could certainly fight tooth and nail to have your government abandon all their manned space flight efforts, but especially Mars exploration/settlement. From my perspective that won't be a problem, since the Chinese certainly, the Indians probably and the Europeans perhaps, will go ahead.
Bingo. Too bad the heart of men is desperately wicked though eh?As the Apollo moon landing program cost about 20% of what the Vietnam war cost, and the war represented - on average - about 20% of defence spending over that period. Put another way, there are multiple things we could cut that would allow that house building program that we would both welcome.
Upvote
0