Beckie--
In your first post in this thread, you wrote:
Here's my thoughts on the matter.
We have a gay czar, right? I can't remember which dept. he serves) When he was appointed, headlines everywhere were "GAY MAN APPOINTED CZAR". For other appointments we didn't see "NON-GAY MAN APPOINTED..." or "HETEROSEXUAL MAN..."
It seems that for gay people, their sexuality must be attached to everything they do. And this isn't on them...it's on anyone who feels they have to attach it. We shouldn't have headlines that talk about one's sexuality when it has nothing to do with the subject at hand.
That's what I think of in terms of flaunting. I don't think that gays flaunt their physical sexuality any more than heterosexuals do.
This is a well thought out position. Not my position, exactly, but one I can respect and even agree with, as far as it goes.
Where things started going sour was in a later post:
That makes no sense whatsoever. You're basically saying that those of us who are married use those things to basically say "nyah nyah we're legally married and you're not" when that's not the case at all. I don't flaunt my marriage, but nor do I hide it.
I certainly hope that supporters of gay marriage don't have this as one of their talking points. I'm not flaunting anything by wearing my wedding ring. It's merely one more symbol that I'm married.
Again, a position that I can respect and agree with, but not one that every conservative takes. To many of them it is exactly those little, everyday "reminders" that the partner a man (whom they happen to know to be gay) goes home to each night is another man which they call "flaunting" their sexuality.
Gays have been criticized for "getting in [my] face" with their orientation for these little things. Some of the posters have used these kinds of little things that are clear about your life from your posts, and how you present yourself (username, wedding ring, etc) here on the forum to illustrate those kinds of criticisms they face every day.
That you got defensive is only natural. They were getting personal, and seemed to be bordering on insult. But getting defensive blinded you to their point. When it is directed at a gay person, it is just as personal, and it is not just bordering on insult, it is intended to be insulting.
Your response seemed to indicate that you believe that it is only a few ignorant people who do this, and they can be ignored. That most people agree with you. It is their experience, however that among conservatives it is a more common attitude than yours, and it bothers them that you can dismiss it so lightly.
I believe a careful reading of the posts will indicate that no one has accused
you either of taking that attitude toward gays, or of
actually "flaunting" your orientation, as opposed to doing the same ordinary things everyone does, but for which gays are accused of "flaunting."
"If the shoe doesn't fit .... "