Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And since they follow the flat earth delusion, then they believe we certainly have not been in space for over 50 years!I hear a lot of Christians saying that we live on a flat earth and nobody can go in or out the earth. Is the Bible clear on this subject?
Yes, by all means we should go back to the dark ages of medieval knowledge.(so-called) Enlightenment
Yes, firmament. I rest my case.
Your assumption is unnecessarily presumptuous. Claudius Ptolemaeus (Ptolemy) is referenced on my website (see Aristarchus of Samos).The Pagans believed in geocentrism.
I assume you probably haven't heard of Ptolemy.
-CryptoLutheran
The Enlightenment ideas culminated in the anti-Catholic genocide of the French Revolution. Would you care to go back to the Age of (so-called) Enlightenment?Yes, by all means we should go back to the dark ages of medieval knowledge.
But then what about all the things like cars, jets and espresso machines that the enlightenment paved the way for?
We cannot go back nor would I care to go back. But some here seem to want to go back to pre-enlightenment. With such a distaste for science how do they justify living with all its benefits?The Enlightenment ideas culminated in the anti-Catholic genocide of the French Revolution. Would you care to go back to the Age of (so-called) Enlightenment?
It's the heliocentrists that have a distaste for real science. But as far as real science is concerned, please work through my webpage titled, Evolution Refuted by the Ribosme. Do not confuse technology with real science, or with scientism, for that matter, as explained in my webpage titled, Science vs. Scientism.We cannot go back nor would I care to go back. But some here seem to want to go back to pre-enlightenment. With such a distaste for science how do they justify living with all its benefits?
and yet here you are on a marvel of a device utilizing the web.It's the heliocentrists that have a distaste for real science. But as far as real science is concerned, please work through my webpage titled, Evolution Refuted by the Ribosme. Do not confuse technology with real science, or with scientism, for that matter, as explained in my webpage titled, Science vs. Scientism.
Benefits you say? It's a mixed bag of tricks to say the least, as anyone who has had an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 "vaccine" would tell you.
Which is also a mixed bag of tricks.and yet here you are on a marvel of a device utilizing the web.
-
shamayim is used in Genesis 1:1, 1:8, 1:9, 1:14, 1:15, 1:17, 1:20, 1:26, 1:28, 1:30
raqia is used in Genesis 1:6, 1:7, 1:8, 1:14, 1:15, 1:17, 1:20,
What The Bible states is the raqia God created, God called heaven,sky and this is the location where God placed the sun, moon and stars between two bodies of water. It can be seen that the sky is an extended surface that is over the earth God created.
There is no indication that The Bible is stating this is an outer space where the sun, moon stars and (planets not mentioned in The Bible) are millions, billions of miles/light years away from earth
Psalms 19:1 (NKJV)
The heavens declare the glory of God;
And the firmament shows His handiwork.
heavens
8064 [e]
haš·šā·ma·yim,
הַשָּׁמַ֗יִם
The heavens
Art | N‑m
firmament
7549 [e]
hā·rā·qî·a‘.
הָרָקִֽיעַ׃
the firmament
Art | N‑ms
You have no case. Pretend scholars who have a one word theology have no credibility. Then there are those who wholly uphold the Word of God.Yes, firmament. I rest my case.
You are consumed by your presumptuousness.You have no case. Pretend scholars who have a one word theology have no credibility. Then there are those who wholly uphold the Word of God.
Faithful Witnessess
And you have resorted to ad hominems, in violation of the rules of these forums.You are consumed by your presumptuousness.
Charlie Duke witnessed the earth from space and it led to him becoming a Christian. You sit there in your comfortable armchair and mock his testimony. I imagine you don't believe that he really became a Christian but simply claimed to be so that he could undermine 'Biblical truth'™ from the inside as part of some great conspiracy.-Someone should tell the astronaut, what earth means in The Bible.
Charlie Duke witnessed the earth from space and it led to him becoming a Christian. You sit there in your comfortable armchair and mock his testimony. I imagine you don't believe that he really became a Christian but simply claimed to be so that he could undermine 'Biblical truth'™ from the inside as part of some great conspiracy.
And you have resorted to ad hominems, in violation of the rules of these forums.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?