Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
View attachment 183391 So here is photographic proof of a round earth!
Think about who promotes globe theory and ask yourself if it is a Godly outfit?
So here is photographic proof of a round earth!
Plants were made on day 3, Adam was made on day 6. If you believe that this is not a literal day (despite "and the evening and morning were day ___") then I can't defend myself. But if this is a literal 24 hour period, then 3 days is not long enough for anything to be produced to feed Adam. Again, I believe in literal days, and the evening and morning were 1 day... I take that literally and there isn't anything at this point that can change that view. So again, let's not waste each others time.
Blessings.
It's sort of like having a trial, and all the evidence points to the accused being guilty, yet the jury finds him not guilty. Creationism runs contrary to the evidence. Instead of starting with evidence and then reaching conclusions, it starts with the conclusions, and then picks and chooses what "evidence" it wants to hear.
And yet no one can measure the acceleration of the Earth. Even parrots can recite what they have been taught, without giving any critical analysis to their words.The earth being a globe is not just a theory. It's 100% fact. Only hyper-literalist conspiracy nuts believe in a flat earth. Also, the "firmament" that the stars are supposedly fixed in doesn't exist.
The stars are scattered throughout the galaxy. the closest star, apart from our own sun, which is 92.96 million miles away, is Proxima Centauri, which is 4.423 light years away.
From a design standpoint, the earth, which is a planet, completing one revolution around the sun every 365 days makes more sense than the whole sky turning once every night.
This about sums up your response. You've posted excuses of why you believe your theory hasn't been disproved, but nothing to demonstrate proof of the additional theories you've had to use to prop up your disproved theory (i.e. heliocentrism).there are some statements just to goofy to even attempt to address
Right. But scientifically, the plants would be over 3 days old.
If you would have bothered to have read earlier, information explaining the "fish eye" rounded effect has been made.
By the way, that pictures shows a span across of maybe two to five miles, depending on whether close up or far away. You're not going to see a "curve" in five miles, even if the Earth were a sphere. Goodness.
Sure... but not producing food yet. Look Sky.... and if Open Heart is reading.... it plainly states the trees brought forth fruit, I am not denying that. But that line does not say when and how it is YOU BOTH who are assuming this takes a great deal of time... or at least, longer than Adam could fast for. I am simply suggesting it happened as stated but at an accelerated rate. I am trying to deal with the "fact" that Adam was created a man (again, he had the appearance of age because he was not created as a baby) and he would have had to eat.
How long should it take for the earth to form? Science would demand a GREAT DEAL of time. Yet God said, "Let there be..." and it was. Now creation can follow the same line of progression science demands, but at a rate much faster than science has an answer for. That doesn't bother me as we don't need to have science agree with God, science is man observing and man drawing conclusions. But we are talking about God and God does not need man to understand Him. If Adam was made on day 6, and he was made a man, then he would need to eat like a man and that requires food. I have given an answer to that issue, I am trying to deal with it. Instead of telling me how wrong I am, give me an answer that provides Adam with something to eat before he dies of starvation.
Blessings.
Ken
I fixed the starvation problem. "Time" is a gift from God to delay our payment.
23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
So it seems "time" as we know it, started when Adam sinned.
Genesis 2:17 "but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat,
for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die."
So up until Adam sinned, the type of "time" that kills us, causing things to age, did not exist.
So Creation week was orderly, but not subject to the type of time we know where
each day you are 24 hours closer to death.
I feel God thought this too heady a topic for humans, so it sits in the "Have Faith" pile.
what theory?This about sums up your response. You've posted excuses of why you believe your theory hasn't been disproved,
But it's 99.9% flat. 8 inches curve in 63,000 inches. It's mighty flat.
Much flatter than a pancake.
You are making the mistake of assuming the Hebrew word "yom" means a 24 hour long day. It does not always mean so. It can refer to an indefinite period of time. Even in English "day" doesn't always refer to a 24 hour long period of time. For example, I can say, "In my day we sat around the TV and watched shows as a family. Check out definition #2:I told you, you cannot change my mind and yet you continue to try. Adam didn't nurse off God's breasts, he needed food. Therefore, either the trees produced fruit at an advanced speed or they were created bearing fruit.... but in the end you still have to deal with the fact that Adam had to eat. Food had to be available, I have offered an answer. Perhaps it is a wrong answer, but it is an attempt at an answer. Telling me I am wrong is not you solving the problem. Perhaps you might spend some time trying to solve it instead of telling me how wrong I am?Blessings sis.
Sure. If new evidence comes up, we'll re-evaluate. However, this is not a case where there is just some evidence. There is tons and tons. This isn't just beyond a reasonable doubt. This is beyond any doubt.Yep---like the 12 men and one woman who were found guilty because all the evidence pointed to that and executed. Then they discovered they were actually innocent. Who says all the evidence is in? There is more to find out yet. I'll wait for science to catch up to what God has said.
You are making the mistake of assuming the Hebrew word "yom" means a 24 hour long day. It does not always mean so. It can refer to an indefinite period of time. Even in English "day" doesn't always refer to a 24 hour long period of time. For example, I can say, "In my day we sat around the TV and watched shows as a family. Check out definition #2:
day
dā/
noun
1.a period of twenty-four hours as a unit of time, reckoned from one midnight to the next, corresponding to a rotation of the earth on its axis.
synonyms: a twenty-four-hour period, twenty-four hours
"I stayed for a day"
2.
a particular period of the past; an era.
"the laws were very strict in those days"
synonyms: period, time, age, era, generation
"the leading architect of the day"
Thus, there is no problem with trees growing from the ground, which is exactly what Genesis 1 states.
No, if I were to bring up a problem, I would mention that plants are not created until after Adam per Genesis 2. And it also explicitly states that they grow from the ground, rather than are created in adult form.
Look up "selenehelion". One occurred on Dec 10, 2011, but they have occurred quite a number of times through history. These are when a lunar eclipse occurs at the same time the sun is above the horizon. Impossible according to the ball-Earth theory of lunar eclipses, invalidating your "proof 1".
If the earth doesn't orbit the sun, it still shouldn't bother you as both measurements are taken from the earth, just at different seasons.They only measure the parallax because they believe the Earth to be spinning about the sun. It is not. If they used simple trignometry, the stars are much closer. This is really the only scientific way to do it.
But then again...it's mighty big.But it's 99.9% flat. 8 inches curve in 63,000 inches. It's mighty flat.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?