Freodin
Devout believer in a theologically different God
Yes, there are books. Modern books tend to be rather simplistic, or rewrites of the earlier Victorian flat earthers. Who had to write books, because their access to the internet and YouTube was rather sporadic. )Books!? Really? Videos, yes, those are a dime a dozen. And they tend to make me laugh at the terrible ignorance of the creators of those videos. Almost all of those can be refuted by Desertphile's Gravity Rant. Due to just a touch, not excessive, of "foul language" I will not link it here, but if you search YouTube for it you should have no trouble finding it.
Each and every "flat earth" (or other alternative versions) model that has been presented in video or book tends to go into two directions: they either criticise parts of the "heliocentric model", and this criticism is based on ignorance of the model... or they present alternative explanations for observations, which are either unverified or contradicting.
I have yet to see an "alternative model" of the earth that is not fundamentally flawed.
But because most Flat Earthers do not have the knowledge to understand that - even disregard this knowledge as "masonic lies" - they are fundamentally unable to understand that.
The Flat Earthers that I have seen presenting their "models" are just prime examples of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Upvote
0