Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not all about you and your chosen religion.
*patienceActually, it is, some just aren't aware of it yet.
Patients.
As to evolution...haven't we discussed that several times already, and no one at all could prove it exists? Or is the OP intended as a breakthrough?
No, just a snapshot of one small part of evolutionary development. The OP was not intended to be "proof" of anything, just interesting and informative.Actually, it is, some just aren't aware of it yet.
Patients.
As to evolution...haven't we discussed that several times already, and no one at all could prove it exists? Or is the OP intended as a breakthrough?
*patience
The OP was not intended to be "proof" of anything, just interesting and informative
As to evolution...haven't we discussed that several times already, and no one at all could prove it exists?
That it's not all about you and your religion? What's the point? You seem to think that anything we say is an attack on you and your religion.Well, at least there was no argument with the basics of the actual subject matter of my post...I'll take it.
[/QUOTE]"The main scientific objection to evolution is not about the whether change occurs through time, and neither is it about the size of the change (so use of the terms 'micro-' and 'macro-evolution' should be discouraged). It isn't even about whether natural selection happens. The key issue is the type of change required - to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA 'letters' stored in each human nucleus convey a great deal more information than the half a million DNA 'letters' of the simplest self-reproducing organism... all the alleged 'proofs of evolution in action' to date do not show functional new information added to the genes. Rather, they involve sorting and/or loss of information." - Jonathon Sarfati
[/QUOTE]"The main scientific objection to evolution is not about the whether change occurs through time, and neither is it about the size of the change (so use of the terms 'micro-' and 'macro-evolution' should be discouraged). It isn't even about whether natural selection happens. The key issue is the type of change required - to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA 'letters' stored in each human nucleus convey a great deal more information than the half a million DNA 'letters' of the simplest self-reproducing organism... all the alleged 'proofs of evolution in action' to date do not show functional new information added to the genes. Rather, they involve sorting and/or loss of information." - Jonathon Sarfati
Safarti is a particularly slimy case. Because of his educational background he knows better. His misrepresentations of Information Theory are sly and insidious.LOL! You are not even trying. That man may have a PhD in chemistry, but he has to deny almost all of science. He is of all things a Young Earth Creationist. There is no real difference between YEC's and Flat Earthers, they are all extreme science deniers.
That was successfully demonstrated to the scientific community in the 19th century.
That it's not all about you and your religion? What's the point? You seem to think that anything we say is an attack on you and your religion.
Quite the opposite. There is no doubt in the scientific community about the fact that life is the product of evolution. There are only a handful of science denying loons (and yes, there are even some science deniers in the sciences, there comments often break irony meters everywhere).Actually, it is, some just aren't aware of it yet.
Patients.
As to evolution...haven't we discussed that several times already, and no one at all could prove it exists? Or is the OP intended as a breakthrough?
Certainly not "our" religion. You have made the point on several occasions that you don't consider me a fellow Christian because I don't share your view of Genesis.You really didn't get the point? It was that...it IS about my/our religion. Not sure how your "attack" comment even fits here, I didn't think the The OP was attacking anyone, only that he was ignorant of the fact.
Certainly not "our" religion.
You have made the point on several occasions that you don't consider me a fellow Christian because I don't share your view of Genesis.
But that is just talk.
Best way to back your claim is to show us in detail how evolution is a fact. Can you do that please?
As to evolution...haven't we discussed that several times already, and no one at all could prove it exists? Or is the OP intended as a breakthrough?
I'm an Anglican.I gathered that....Without walking you through the details of word usage, suffice to say, coming from me, "ours" doesn't mean those that don't believe that. Hint: "our" belief.
Show me where I made the point? And while we're at it, we can clear that up... what is your "Other Religion"
No, it's history of science. In the first half of the 19th century, there was growing awareness that evolution was a fact, and the gathering pieces of evidence required an explanation. Darwin (among others) provided an explanation for the fact of evolution in the middle of the century. Within a short time, his view convinced the relevant experts and biology has accepted evolution as a fundamental theory ever since -- indeed, it has only grown stronger and more explanatory over time.
Sure, different geological strata laid down at different times contain different groups of fossil animals and plants. Living things have changed over time. That's evolution.
We're all well familiar with your shtick by now Kenny.
But tell me this: do you believe that Henry Morris was right when he said "The purpose of the theory of evolution is to deny the existence of God"?
You forgot to add proof the living things had changed over time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?