- May 28, 2018
- 14,282
- 6,364
- 69
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Interesting way to think.That is why satan means adversary. Personal will over the will of
God. We are all satans.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Interesting way to think.That is why satan means adversary. Personal will over the will of
God. We are all satans.
It's their self-justification.A Mr. Hyde pretending to be Dr. Jekyl? How can they not know what they are underneath the mask? Wait. Who told them they were sheep?
When was the first evil act/thought and when was it committed. I'm guessing it was before the fall of man... was it also before the creation of the heavens and the earth? Or somewhere in between?
How? When? By whom?
Thank you.
Maybe... if corporate entities are wearing sheep-skins.
Many may not even realize their wolf nature, seeing themselves as being benevolent even if they are anti-Christ in nature. They are completely of the world with no inkling of God. The Adversary mimics what God has done and that will include coming across as some sort of messiah, but of the world rather than the Kingdom. We see it in action now on a global basis with a so called think tank of the world's 'greatest' in their own minds calling the shots. (WEF)
BTW when I said controlling governments I didn't mean as politicians.
I agree sort of, I don't think Satan has a choice to repent, but we do,Interesting way to think.
Not so sure. God made him " cunning" He did not make Adam and Eve cunning. The adversary has a purpose, to test humanity, within Gods will.So, the servant was in opposition to God, no? Not that he was successful in opposing what God had planned all along, but....
You may wish to think of satan as an entity rather than simply as opposing the will of God. Peter wasn't called Satan but a satan, a description of his adversarial thinking to the will of God.I don't think Satan has a choice to repent, but we do,
Actually, he does Gods will, he is the tester. He needed God's permission to test Job.You may wish to think of satan as an entity rather than simply as opposing the will of God. Peter wasn't called Satin but a satin, a description of his adversarial thinking to the will of God.
Not so sure. God made him " cunning" He did not make Adam and Eve cunning.
Possibilities do not indicate existence.
If the possibility of evil (opposition to all GODliness) had a real existence within GOD's mind then YHWH is a house divided and so cannot last: Mark 3:25 If a house is divided against itself, it cannot stand. The idea of the eternal existence of evil as an existent evil outside of YHWH is a Gnostic belief shared by Zoroastrianism, et al.
If knowledge of something necessitates that it exist then Gods knowledge of evil had to eternally exist, which means it was at least always in his mind, but also maybe outside himself, in the form of not God.
If you don’t agree then you have to say Gods knowledge of evil is not eternal, which either means it came into existence without God knowing or he learned that evil is eternal.
What do you think I’m missing here?
There is cold hard logic, and there is presumptive logic. Ours, at best, is unavoidably a little of both. We don't even know what "exists" means, except as we conceive of it. And so we throw our logic at it.
God, as first cause, is not affected by principles from outside himself, or he is not God. God does not learn —he is the very source of fact and reality.
Maybe evil does not even exist. None of us knows what existence is —we only know what we think we mean by it.
We're not going to find all our answers to this, in this life. We hardly even know how to ask valid questions.
While I don’t think it’s consistent with Christian Biblical teaching—the idea that our perception of evil is really a lack of understanding/knowledge of what God is doing, is somewhat interesting to me.
Which is why we must reverse what Eve and Adam did. We must see what we call good is actually evil. We must understand how our 'self' oriented nature produces all sin simply because we take rather than give. God's will and His second commandment was to do the opposite.But Evil being the privation of Good, it is not understood until Good is understood.
Where do you find your narrative in Scripture?Which is why we must reverse what Eve and Adam did. We must see what we call good is actually evil. We must understand how our 'self' oriented nature produces all sin simply because we take rather than give. God's will and His second commandment was to do the opposite.
He made them innocent vs cunning.I must disagree. No one can be made, formed or created as evil (cunning in evil) by GOD but only by a free will decision to repudiate YHWH's divinity or to rebel against one of HIS commands.
Light cannot create darkness.
A good tree cannot put forth rotten fruit.
A stream of life giving water cannot put forth salt or brackish water.
Psalm 5:4 You are not a God who takes pleasure in evil; with you the wicked cannot dwell. As one who utterly detests all evil, YHWH would never create HIS Bride as disgustingly evil in her righteousness even with a plan to save her.
So, Adam could not have been created sinful...but there he was, looking to the animals for a helper to fix the NOT GOOD (a kind of opposite to the later very good) in HIS creation when GOD had Eve waiting for HIM.
When was the first evil act/thought and when was it committed. I'm guessing it was before the fall of man... was it also before the creation of the heavens and the earth? Or somewhere in between?
How? When? By whom?
Thank you.