Who else could they marry and have children with since there were NO other Humans for Noah's grandsons to marry when the Ark arrived? Like Cain, on Adam's Earth, they married and had children with the prehistoric people who descended from Water on the 5th Day. Gen 1:21 Science AGREES and the bones of these people are found all over our Earth for Millions of years BEFORE the Ark arrived, 11,000 years ago...and they could have children with Humans (descendants of Adam). Gen 6:1-4
-_- the DNA of people thousands of years farther in the past than you claim the arrival of the Ark is recognizably DNA belonging to our species. By your claims of interbreeding at about 11 thousand years ago between "true humans" and "prehistoric peoples", DNA prior to and after that key time period should be notably different. Furthermore, DNA of "true humans" should have been discovered by now, and it hasn't.
However, the truth of the matter is, even if you tripled the number of "true humans" on the ark, and all of them maintained lineages, the resulting interbreeding would have been entirely inconsequential to the genetics of the "prehistoric people" population. The number is too few to actually impact their evolution at all. So, even if Noah and the rest of his family were extremely prolific, by this point, their genetic contribution would be so watered down that modern humans would essentially be these "prehistoric peoples", not Noah's species or even a defined hybrid species.
Every living creature on planet Earth came from L.U.C.A. or the Last universal common ancestor, which was created from Water exactly as Gen 1:21 states. It's proof of God since no man who lived 3k years ago could have gotten that one so scientifically correct.
No, the bible says "things that moveth" come from water. It specifies that, implying that either biblical authors didn't know of animals that don't move, or that the bible is entirely missing where non-moving animals come from.
In order for you to claim that "the bible, science, and history do not conflict" does not demand that you fill in theological gaps with science and pretend that the bible doesn't have these gaps. The bible says nothing of the nature of electricity, of atoms, or even that galaxies exist. The bible isn't long enough to cover everything.
However, any time you claim that the bible does mention something, you have to back it up with verses that specify the topic. Mentioning that stars exist is not the same as stating that galaxies exist, for example.
Noah's descendants were Humans and they did NOT want to be scattered among the prehistoric people all over the Earth...BUT...the Lord knew it was the correct way to produce the 7.4 Billion Humans alive today so.
The explicit reason people were scattered was to actually harm humanity and it's potential for progress: 5 But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. 6 The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. 7 Come, let us and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”
There's absolutely NOTHING suggesting the events at Babel benefited humanity in the long run. Logically, creating multiple languages wouldn't benefit humanity, aside from sign language for the deaf and mute, and braille as a written language for the blind. Those languages were definitively made by us, not any god.
Sure, but it took them thousands of years whereas the Lord scattered Humanity all over the Earth, including Australia, at about the same time.
Wrong, our species was already present in Australia over 40 thousand years ago. People had long since spread around by 10-11 thousand years ago.
After Noah's descendants mixed with prehistoric people, they learned to grow food and settle down. Adam farmed with NO evolution.
-_- technology and innovation aren't a part of evolution. People in the 1500s were not "less evolved" than modern people on account of less advanced technology. Furthermore, the start of farming is estimated at 12,000 years ago, which falls 1000 years before Noah's arrival, according to you.
History calls the area SW of Lake Van, Turkey, the Cradle of Civilization on this Earth. Farming, city building and EVERY other trait of modern Humans came from the Fertile Crescent which began in Northern Mesopotamia, the land between the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.
Incorrect. Farming techniques and what is farmed varied significantly by region, and people that lived in North America were isolated from the people in the Fertile Crescent before farming began. Another way genetics counter your claims: the slight variations of human races. If people had been spread around about 10,000 years ago, there would have been significant genetic mixing at this time. Yet, our genes indicate otherwise.
Not so, since they were made for each other. His kinds (Jesus) and Their kinds (Trinity) CAN have children together as Gen 6:1-4 states. Another scientific proof of the Literal God.
Genesis never names "prehistoric peoples", so your claims about them are empty from a theological perspective. That it names that "moving animals" exist is not specific enough to back your claim.
Some falsely accuse me of being a racist unless I agree that ALL people on planet Earth today are Humans (descendants of Adam). I know of NO prehistoric people alive on planet Earth today, so I agree. ALL Humans today are a combination of His Jesus kinds (Humans) and Their kinds (prehistoric people) who came from Water.
So you are just going to ignore that not every human on this planet has genes indicating hybridization with other species and that this directly contradicts your claim that the intelligence within all modern humans is the result of such hybridization.
I know and the sons of God (prehistoric people) are falsely classified as Humans which is totally false since NO prehistoric person descended from Adam.
You do not know, for you have no evidence at all by which to back your claim that people that lived more than 11 thousand years ago on this planet weren't the same species as ourselves. Even their genes match up.
The sons of God (prehistoric people) did not have the superior intelligence Adam was made with UNTIL they married and had children with Humans (descendants of Adam). It's HOW God produced the 7.4 Billion Humans alive today.
In scripture where? In science where? In history where?
Not so, since NO other living creature posts since they don't have the required superior intelligence of Adam, who was made with an intelligence like God's. Gen 3:22
-_- there are chimpanzees that write and use sign language. Most of what they like to talk about is food. Studies also have found that they understand the basic concept of currency.
There were NO Humans (descendants of Adam) on this Earth until some 11k years ago, according to History
Wrong, according to both science and history, our species has existed for at least 100 thousand years.
AND they appeared suddenly in the mountains of Ararat exactly as God told us.
Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE Science, History and Scripture AGREE. God Bless you
Incorrect, Ararat is too far North East of the area where agriculture actually started (if it actually began in the Fertile Cresent and not China). Your map doesn't distinguish the fact that the boundary of the Fertile Cresent expands farther than the area in which agriculture began the earliest. When agriculture started, it was in Syria or China. Ararat is in Eastern Turkey. Furthermore, you don't account for the fact that farm animals were raised before agriculture took place in the Fertile Cresent, in 13000 BCE.
Another problem: the bible claims people were scattered all over, but Judaism remained confined to a limited area. Why? The same god spread all of these people around, but only those that remained in a specific area kept worshiping this deity and documenting it? That makes absolutely no sense.