First born

[lesliedellow]

False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation. We know more than God, they preach to our babies in Schools. We teach the Truth of Science during the week and leave religion to the weekend, they spew.

These "Scoffers of the last days" offend our children about their faith in Jesus, not knowing that a more terrible punishment awaits them for their evil deeds. Mat 18:6 Soon, they will be exposed to the world for their incomplete satanic ToE will be proven totally False. It is based on incomplete facts which cannot explain Human origins no matter how many meanings of words they change in order to make it fit with their false speculations.

Nice rant. Shame it has no substance.

 

[Subduction Zone]

False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation. We know more than God, they preach to our babies in Schools. We teach the Truth of Science during the week and leave religion to the weekend, they spew.

These "Scoffers of the last days" offend our children about their faith in Jesus, not knowing that a more terrible punishment awaits them for their evil deeds. Mat 18:6 Soon, they will be exposed to the world for their incomplete satanic ToE will be proven totally False. It is based on incomplete facts which cannot explain Human origins no matter how many meanings of words they change in order to make it fit with their false speculations.

Wrong again, but then you actively resist learning about science. I can't help someone that refuses to learn.

 

[DogmaHunter]

False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation. We know more than God, they preach to our babies in Schools. We teach the Truth of Science during the week and leave religion to the weekend, they spew.

These "Scoffers of the last days" offend our children about their faith in Jesus, not knowing that a more terrible punishment awaits them for their evil deeds. Mat 18:6 Soon, they will be exposed to the world for their incomplete satanic ToE will be proven totally False. It is based on incomplete facts which cannot explain Human origins no matter how many meanings of words they change in order to make it fit with their false speculations.

Whenever an argument about reality devolves into "you need to believe me, or else...!", it is safe to assume that you got nothing.

The truth doesn't need any scaring. Only falsehoods need such empty threats.
It's a dead give-away how very poor your argument really is.

 

[Aman777]

Nice rant. Shame it has no substance.

Bad excuse. If it had no substance, it would be easy for you to refute. Remember, that I accept refutes either Scripturally, scientifically or historically, if you can. Fool us and do something no one else can. Amen?

 

[Aman777]

Wrong again, but then you actively resist learning about science. I can't help someone that refuses to learn.

What's wrong? Is it too hard to fool anyone but a child? Of course it is. Tell us HOW and WHEN magical evolution changed beasts into Humans.

 

[Aman777]

Whenever an argument about reality devolves into "you need to believe me, or else...!", it is safe to assume that you got nothing.

The truth doesn't need any scaring. Only falsehoods need such empty threats.
It's a dead give-away how very poor your argument really is.

Looks like you've got the atheist crowd fooled. They will believe ANYthing which blames God for their own willful ignorance. Tell us HOW God's superior intelligence got inside Apes and please don't invoke magical evolution since it's a big Lie. If you can't refute me, then seek help from other more knowledgeable evols.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What's wrong? Is it too hard to fool anyone but a child? Of course it is. Tell us HOW and WHEN magical evolution changed beasts into Humans.

That demand is ignorant. Evolution was slow and gradual, there was no magic to it. That is your belief.

Your beliefs have been shown to be wrong so you strawman the beliefs of others. This is not an effective debating technique.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Looks like you've got the atheist crowd fooled. They will believe ANYthing which blames God for their own willful ignorance. Tell us HOW God's superior intelligence got inside Apes and please don't invoke magical evolution since it's a big Lie. If you can't refute me, then seek help from other more knowledgeable evols.

If you want to claim that evolution is a lie the burden of proof is upon you. Sadly you know that you have no evidence.

And you are back to your strawman argument again. You really need to learn what you are trying to debate against. You can only make yourself look bad when you keep trying to put your failed strawman as what the theory of evolution says.

 

[lesliedellow]

Bad excuse. If it had no substance, it would be easy for you to refute. Remember, that I accept refutes either Scripturally, scientifically or historically, if you can. Fool us and do something no one else can. Amen?

"False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation."

The very first sentence is arant nonsense. It would have to include people like:

Charles Kingsley (Anglican priest, and friend of Darwin)
Asa Gray (American evangelical, and friend of Darwin)
Martin Nowak (Christian and biologist at Harvard)
Denis Alexander (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)
Sam Berry (Christian and biologist at University College London)
Ken Miller (Christian and biologist at Brown University)
Simon Conway Morris (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)

Need I go on?

 

[Aman777]

That demand is ignorant. Evolution was slow and gradual, there was no magic to it. That is your belief.

Your beliefs have been shown to be wrong so you strawman the beliefs of others. This is not an effective debating technique.

I can show you where the change from prehistoric to modern Humans happened in just ONE generation. Your view is too broad and asks that we have FAITH in the changeable scientific Theories of mortal mankind, WITHOUT any evidence which supports your view. Your claim that the highest intelligence on Earth just happened, with no direction, and no way to inject this superior intelligence into Apes. IOW, that view is ridiculous and unevidenced, or the biggest Satanic Lie ever forced upon our innocent children. Try to do better.

 

[bhsmte]

"False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation."

The very first sentence is arant nonsense. It would have to include people like:

Charles Kingsley (Anglican priest, and friend of Darwin)
Asa Gray (American evangelical, and friend of Darwin)
Martin Nowak (Christian and biologist at Harvard)
Denis Alexander (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)
Sam Berry (Christian and biologist at University College London)
Ken Miller (Christian and biologist at Brown University)
Simon Conway Morris (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)

Need I go on?

You forgot francis collins.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I can show you where the change from prehistoric to modern Humans happened in just ONE generation. Your view is too broad and asks that we have FAITH in the changeable scientific Theories of mortal mankind, WITHOUT any evidence which supports your view. Your claim that the highest intelligence on Earth just happened, with no direction, and no way to inject this superior intelligence into Apes. IOW, that view is ridiculous and unevidenced, or the biggest Satanic Lie ever forced upon our innocent children. Try to do better.

Nope, you can't. You have no reliable evidence for your claims. All you have are is a terribly flawed personal interpretation of the Bible.

You have no clue as to what is and what is not evidence, or else you are lying. I am going with the former. I can help you to understand the nature of evidence.

 

[Aman777]

"False, unless the Theory is true. If the ToE is examined, it's nothing but a false assumption of godless men who have tried for centuries to eliminate God from His own Creation."

The very first sentence is arant nonsense. It would have to include people like:

Charles Kingsley (Anglican priest, and friend of Darwin)
Asa Gray (American evangelical, and friend of Darwin)
Martin Nowak (Christian and biologist at Harvard)
Denis Alexander (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)
Sam Berry (Christian and biologist at University College London)
Ken Miller (Christian and biologist at Brown University)
Simon Conway Morris (Christian and biologist at Cambridge)

Need I go on?

Do the men you list know more than God? Of course not. God tells us He created and brought forth from Water, every living creature that moveth. Gen 1:21 Science learned the SAME thing last year, more than 3k years AFTER God told us. Meet Luca, the Ancestor of All Living Things

God also tells us that ONLY the Christians of the last days of this Earth have the increased knowledge to understand Genesis. Dan 12:4 Did the "scholars" you listed study the theology of ancient men OR of the people of the last days?

 

[bhsmte]

LOL

 

[lesliedellow]

You forgot francis collins.

I also didn't mention Joan Roughgarden, Werner Arber or Peter Agre. What of it?

Oops. I thought I was replying to Aman777

 

[Aman777]

Nope, you can't. You have no reliable evidence for your claims. All you have are is a terribly flawed personal interpretation of the Bible.

You have no clue as to what is and what is not evidence, or else you are lying. I am going with the former. I can help you to understand the nature of evidence.

No you cannot. All you can do is give your own flawed personal opinion biased by the fact that you believe the Lie of evolutionism. Were you forced into believing such a farce as a child?

 

[Aman777]

You forgot francis collins.

Doesn't matter since NO man who studies ancient theology can make sense of Genesis. Only the Christians of the last days can. Dan 12:4

 

[Ygrene Imref]

Can anyone provide physical evidence of the first mammal that was born? What was the mother (species) and what was the father (species) Not interested in speculation, conjecture, beliefs, I am looking for something that can stand up to a challenge?

Up front, I do not believe anyone can provide such evidence but I have been wrong before and this may be one of those times, time will tell.

Since there is no concrete evidence, or a way to present evidence in such a way that anyone with the means can reproduce the results independently, you will hear several arguments on how you are not understanding the philosophy/theory correctly.

Very similar to religion.

 

[Aman777]

LOL

Sounds like a nervous laugh to me since my view destroys the False ToE.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No you cannot. All you can do is give your own flawed personal opinion biased by the fact that you believe the Lie of evolutionism. Were you forced into believing such a farce as a child?

Do you realize what you just said? You said that I can't help you with the concept of evidence. You clearly do not understand it. There is no "Lie of evolutionism". You fail every time that you try to support your claims. Wouldn't you like to get just one claim correct sometime during your life?