Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
.
Yeah, I am sure now you were Catholic.
Errors, no errors, just your misunderstanding of Spiritual things, as it says in the Bible, you are out of the loop of understanding being a natural man.
It's really to bad too, it can lead you to Salvation, but your to smart for that......Some day.
What is PROVES is that Noah was a Human male since Apes don't have enough sense to grow grapes and make wine and they don't know HOW to get naked or make a Tent. This is testable evidence of the arrival of Humans, 11k years ago, in the mountains of Ararat. Amen?
All studies of ancient human DNA are, in part, to compare it to modern human DNA and to the other ancient DNA already studied. They wouldn't have to expect to see a notable difference at your claimed 11 thousand year turning point to notice the difference. Furthermore, since intelligence is a physical aspect, it's measurable. So, unless you are going to claim that human intelligence itself is supernatural, and thus not fully measurable, you cannot claim that it wouldn't be detectable through comparisons of "prehistoric peoples" and their hybrids with "true humans". However, you are abandoning science and history entirely if you do claim that our intelligence in and of itself is supernatural.Why should the DNA be different? What you are suggesting is that God, the Creator, is incapable of making Human DNA and prehistoric people's DNA match. How many studies have been made to find the difference 11k years ago? Any?
-_- whether we existed or not, some organism on this planet would be the holder of "most intelligent on the planet". Our species being the tentative holder of it doesn't make our intelligence specifically theologically relevant. Especially considering that what we are actually best at is basic problem solving and, in most other areas, are beaten by other species. As examples, chimpanzees have better memories, and many birds have better spatial reasoning. Also, what about the humans that have debilitating disorders that make them less intelligent than a dog?Wonderful! You are so insightful. The Bible doesn't say the DNA will be the same BUT it allows the superior Intelligence of Adam, which is like God's, Gen 3:22 to enter the brains of children of prehistoric people, who have offspring with Humans. It's is HOW God has produced the 7.4 Billion Humans alive today. We can't prove it with the DNA but we can prove it since Humans have the highest intelligence level of ANY other creature on planet Earth.
All evidence would suggest that the UCA wouldn't have moved. Otherwise, all living things would be liable to move.A coral reef doesn't move but it also came from L.U.C.A. which came from WATER in total agreement with Gen 1:21 AND L.U.C.A. did move.
-_- where human civilization began was not in the fertile crescent. One could even argue that the beginning of culture predates our species entirely, just like the invention of fire and molding basic tools does.Amen. What I have found in more than 30 years of study seeking the agreement of Scripture, science and history is that Genesis chapter one is filled with some evidence, which Science has only recently discovered. The multiverse, where life first began, and how we changed from prehistoric to human are some examples. There are too many examples for it NOT to be true. When you combine this with historic Truth of where Human civilization began, it becomes very interesting.
Actually, some stars, for whatever reason, date as being older than the universe itself does. Not sure what gaps in our knowledge are causing that. Personally, I would conclude that the universe is a bit older than previously thought, and that stars could have been produced directly as a result of the Big Bang.Another agreement with today's scientific discoveries since the FIRST Stars lit up less than 1 billion years after the big bang. This means it was late on the 3rd Day when this happened Gen 2:4 since it was less than a billion years and the FIRST Stars lit up on the 4th Day Gen 1:16 and each of God's Days is more than 4 Billion years in man's time.
-_- lifespan need not be shorter to produce more people. If a deity wanted more people to be born, then reducing gestation period would do the trick. Also, you are just going to abandon your claim that the events at Babel benefited humanity? Because you aren't addressing the fact that causing people to not understand each other is not helpful.The Lord KNEW that the SAME thing which happened on Adam's Earth, would be repeated on planet Earth. The thoughts of the Humans on Adam's Earth were only evil continually Gen 6:5 and it's the same on Earth today. That is WHY the Lord cut our lifespans to some 10% of what they were on Adam's Earth. This allows more people to be made who can choose Heaven or Not. It's God's way of filling His perfect Heaven.
-_- terrorist organizations still ended up existing. Many of the evils people commit they did by themselves in the first place, such as murder and rape. Plus, language barriers as a limit to cooperation between people has been greatly reduced over the years, seeing as people can be multilingual. There's even an app for phones that isn't a bad translator. Not only is understanding people unnecessary to commit evils, but lack of understanding allows perpetrators to more easily dehumanize their victims.This event produced 7.4 living Humans (Adam's descendants) over the face of the whole Earth while not allowing Humans to get together and do evil things.
-_- people have always been saying "the end is near". However, the bible explicitly states that no one will expect the end when it comes, so you should only be concerned if no one is saying "the end is near".It's another indication of the last days since the Internet has brought us all back together and this will bring the end quicker.
Since you have abandoned any sources of information that could have confirmed or disproved your claim, it has no weight. Also, "sons of God" aren't "prehistoric peoples". I looked more into it. The conclusion with the most evidence behind it is that it refers to angels.I'm talking about Humans who were FIRST made. You are confusing the sons of God (prehistoric people) with Humans (descendants of Adam). Today, the Aborigines are Humans showing that sometime in the past, one of Noah's descendants was placed among them. One is all it takes.
-_- you already claimed 11 thousand years ago. Or are you admitting the bible doesn't say a date?Depends on which source you check. It matters NOT to me since I know it happened some 10-12k years ago in Lake Van, Turkey.
So the difference IS measurable, according to you. I'm all ears, how are people that predate 11 thousand years ago physically distinct from people born after that point?That is WHY I wish today's scientists would identify prehistoric people from Humans. They don't because no one has told them the difference and they all worship at the Altar of Evolism. They become arrogantly nasty when their precious ToE is questioned.
Genesis 1:11 claims that plants came from land, even though science depicts all life originating from the oceans, including plants. Genesis 1: 24 has groups of animals coming from the land rather than from the water.IF Genesis 1:21 and science is correct, ALL life came from water, which means that 3,000 years ago, when the Bible first appeared, ONLY God knew that. Such knowledge is proof of the Literal God whether coral reefs move or not.
-_- why would it need to contradict both? You demand that your position has science, history, and scripture all in agreement. So, only one of them has to conflict with one of the other two to destroy your basic premise. Also, the entire modern understanding of genetics conflicts with the biblical claim that one could influence the coloration of livestock by making them stare at branches while they mate.Then show us the study which contradicts History and Scripture. I doubt that you will find it since I'm sure you've already looked for it.
The same reason why people from the 1700s didn't drive cars. Agriculture is an innovation, not a natural inclination. It's also no simple matter for hunter gatherers to start growing crops. Growing crops demands staying in one place, to claim ownership of land and fields. To know which edible plants are reasonable to grow. It poses new challenges, such as dealing with pests. Plus, technology improvement isn't linear with time, so an innovation taking a long time isn't relevant. Also, you know that following the divergence of our lineage and that of chimps, our species didn't immediately exist, nor one comparable. After all, we diverged from chimps about 13 million years ago, and our species hasn't even existed for 500 thousand years.In less than 1% of the time since prehistoric people diverged from Chimps, Humankind has gone from Caves to the Moon and back. Can you explain WHY prehistoric people NEVER grew a crop?
-_- the oldest house that has survived to modern day is from 8500 BCE. But, you wouldn't think that was the first house ever made, right? Or that it was the only one built at that time. Hunter gatherers don't build homes that would last the test of time like a stone house. Homes predate agriculture.built a home or a city?
You say that as if hunter gatherers don't currently exist.or demonstrated ANY modern Human traits until some 11k years ago? when the Ark arrived?
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,Genesis 6:1-4...Science, inside every Human alive today...Fertile Crescent
Chimps do judge murderers and abusers among them. They also mourn the dead. Guess what people don't do if they aren't taught to do it? Grow crops. Read and write. And our morality is also greatly influenced by the teachings and behaviors of people around us.Amen. I once spent 25 cents to watch a chicken play the piano, too. They do whatever they are taught but they cannot Judge.
Arbitrary concepts that boil down to "what is bad for the group is evil, what is good for the group is good". Even ants can make judgements on that. When one ant infected with a fungal spore begins acting strange, they immediately get that ant as far from their colony as possible, least they all die.Only God and the descendants of Adam have this ability to judge between good and evil.
You have to demonstrate that it's their mistake, and not yours.Most claim we became fully human 195,000 years ago. They have mistakenly classified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans (descendants of Adam)
I've already asked you to answer that question, since you are the one claiming that there is a drastic difference between people that lived prior to 11 thousand years ago and people that followed that turning point. From my perspective, the hybridization event you believe happened is a fantasy, and it is up to you to provide evidence that it has merit.I don't argue with dates BUT how do you know the difference between prehistoric people and Humans? It's the question today's science doesn't know the answer to.
Gentile just means "non-Jew". Which all of the "prehistoric people" would have been prior to Noah's arrival. But, plenty could have converted. However, personal lineage isn't relevant to beliefs. Pretty sure all the people scattered from Babel would all be jabbering about the act of an angry god they all witnessed.It's because Abraham was from Ur, in the SAME area where the Ark arrived and one of Noah's grandsons constructions. Abraham was one of Noah's direct descendants and NOT contaminated by the blood of savages/gentiles. Gentiles were NOT accepted by God, until AFTER Jesus died for all of us, Gentiles included. God Bless you
Cool story, broAmen. You are good about the knowledge of this Earth but not about Adam's formation, which was in another Heaven. Adam was made BEFORE the big bang of our cosmos 13.8 Billion years ago, in man's time. He was alive and watched when Jesus lit the FIRST Stars on the 4th Day. Gen 1:16
Adam watched as God created "every living creature that moveth" from water on the 5th Day Gen 1:21 which was some 10 Billion years AFTER he was first made. Adam watched as Jesus formed the beasts of the field and birds and named them at the beginning of the present 6th Day/Age in the Creation. Gen 2:19 Adam also had the FIRST operation which took out a rib and made Eve Gen 2:22.
IF scientists insist that Humans are mammals, then they should also accept that Adam, the FIRST mammal, was made some 14 Billion years ago. Amen?
Repeating the same bare assertion is just repetition. You need to provide evidence for your claim.
Apes know how to do all those things, if they happen to belong to a species known as homo sapiens.
All studies of ancient human DNA are, in part, to compare it to modern human DNA and to the other ancient DNA already studied. They wouldn't have to expect to see a notable difference at your claimed 11 thousand year turning point to notice the difference. Furthermore, since intelligence is a physical aspect, it's measurable. So, unless you are going to claim that human intelligence itself is supernatural, and thus not fully measurable, you cannot claim that it wouldn't be detectable through comparisons of "prehistoric peoples" and their hybrids with "true humans". However, you are abandoning science and history entirely if you do claim that our intelligence in and of itself is supernatural.
You're either making this nonsense up, or you're 50 years behind the curve. It's been known for some time that many animals can reason. Some even show simple metacognition.H... they know the limitations on animals is caused by their inability to reason.
Humans were FIRST MADE billions of years BEFORE the first single celled creature came forth from Water on the 5th Day, on our Planet, which was 3.8 Billion years ago in man's time. Godless evolution has degraded Humanity to the lowest position in creation, when actually, we are FIRST. Teaching our babies a provable Lie will not go unpunished since a special more intense punishment awaits these bumpkins who think they know more than God. Mat 18:6 Amen?
You're either making this nonsense up, or you're 50 years behind the curve. It's been known for some time that many animals can reason. Some even show simple metacognition.
Once you learn how to use the quote feature properly, your comments on reasoning might sound less ironic.
You don't need an explicit language to generalise with concepts and construct and manipulate abstractions, although it helps. Birds, primates, cetaceans, and even octopuses have shown the ability to reason out how to solve novel problems with sequential dependencies without using trial and error - typically involving reasoning through visualisation - i.e. working out the sequence of operations necessary to open a food container, or to reach food by combining tools. Some birds have shown the ability to plan ahead on the basis of limited experience, and one zoo gorilla(?) chimp(?) planned ahead for the next day by collecting a pile of stones in the evening, ready to throw when the visitors came in.Isn't the ability of reason contingent upon logic, which, in turn, is contingent upon a sophisticated language, with things like nouns, verbs and propositions?
A major advantage of language is that it extends reasoning memory by providing a symbolic representation of the concepts & abstractions, which permits longer sequences of operations and explicit 'chunking' of sequences by name into abstract meta-operations.
Not really, no. Although most animals don't have the physiology for fine vocalisation, many can be trained to communicate in other ways. However, one example of language use was Alex, the African Grey parrot, who learned to talk and count and identify objects by their abstract properties (colour, shape, number, size, etc). He even asked existential questions, such as 'What colour Alex?'. Importantly, by using such abstractions meaningfully, he showed understanding of them.Amen, and another proof of God since it's the clearest and most dominant Trait of modern Humans (descendants of Adam) who were made with the superior intelligence of God Gen 3:22 which is ABOVE that of ANY other living creature. Only the descendants of God through Adam have inherited God's ability to SPEAK. God spoke the worlds into being Heb 11:3 and Eve spoke with NO evolution. Gen 3:2 And the woman said...Only Humans speak and post online. Amen?
Not really, no. Although most animals don't have the physiology for fine vocalisation, many can be trained to communicate in other ways. However, one example of language use was Alex, the African Grey parrot, who learned to talk and count and identify objects by their abstract properties (colour, shape, number, size, etc). He even asked existential questions, such as 'What colour Alex?'. Importantly, by using such abstractions meaningfully, he showed understanding of them.
That's also WHY we call it a "Religion" since it has NO evidence to support it's "belief" in the magic of Evolism which CANNOT be repeated.
Oh yeah sure. Christian scientists, a Baptist in this case, like Francis Collins believe evolution is true because there is absolutely no evidence for it whatsoever.
Sure thing. How could anybody fail to see the logic in that?
Let's be honest. Evolution is nothing more than descent with modifications within kinds, in a population over time. Godless men tried to eliminate God so they changed the words from descent with modifications into the evil word, evolution. Then, they added to their deception by falsely assuming that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. Compounding their twisted view, they began teaching this satanic Lie to our children, not knowing that such an evil would not go unpunished. Mat 18:6
Changing words and the meanings of those words does NOT change the Truth.
That Alex was an animal that wasn't human is what invalidates your claim that only the descendants of Adam have inherited the ability to speak.Poor Alex was not a Human, since he, like prehistoric people, did NOT descend from Adam, the common ancestor of all Humans.
You have it backwards. The ToE is not magic or religion because it provides a scientific explanation for human evolutionary origins based on multiple independent lines of factual evidence; and scientific theories are not 'believed in' except as the best current explanation - they're all provisional and open to falsification.The flaw is found in the false ToE which obviously believes in magic since it teaches that Humans descended from the common ancestor of Apes. That's also WHY we call it a "Religion" since it has NO evidence to support it's "belief" in the magic of Evolism which CANNOT be repeated.
Honesty, is it? I suppose you can be honestly mistaken. Darwin himself set out on his voyages as an orthodox Anglican, expecting to find various regions or centres of creation where species originated. What he discovered confounded that expectation. When his joint paper with Wallace on evolution was presented to the Linnean Society, and his book was published, the majority of scientists in the field were also orthodox Christians, bible believers. They were taken aback at first, but over time most were honest enough to acknowledge that the theory, supported by over 20 years of evidence collected by Darwin, was almost certainly correct. This was all before they had molecular genetics or a significant fossil record as independent corroborations.Let's be honest. Evolution is nothing more than descent with modifications within kinds, in a population over time. Godless men tried to eliminate God so they changed the words from descent with modifications into the evil word, evolution. Then, they added to their deception by falsely assuming that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. Compounding their twisted view, they began teaching this satanic Lie to our children, not knowing that such an evil would not go unpunished. Mat 18:6
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?