Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think the point is that God is able to do what He says He will do. According to Moses: "God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?" "For the word of the LORD is right; and all his works are done in truth."My point remains whether god specifically says he can't lie (vocally or written), or whether his word describes his nature as such.
Yet another aspect of God that seems like it must have been fine tuned.I think the point is that God is able to do what He says He will do. According to Moses: "God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?" "For the word of the LORD is right; and all his works are done in truth."
I'm going with beetles. They've had a REALLY good run and are still going strong.Why will no one say why and for whom it was all 'fine tuned'?
OK it was fine tuned, but what did it and who was it done for?
Why then does Krauss write a book about nothing being something. Because most physicists do believe that the singularity whatever it is came out of nothing.Sorry, it has been a while since I studied the Big Bang. I was thinking the singularity existed at one planck time, but that is not exactly correct. General Relativity equations predict that the universe was, at one time, a singularity with infinite density and heat. However, prior to the point in time 1*10^-43 seconds after the beginning of the universe, classic physics models break down, and it is thought that quantum effects dominated, and no meaningful models can be extracted. There may not have even been a singularity, and there are models which describe something other than a singularity, even some which posit an infinite universe. But the point is that it is currently beyond our ability to describe what happened between the singularity (if there was one) and planck time=1.
At planck time=1, classic physics apply. Prior to that, we can't know. We don't know if there was nothing, or if there was something, or what that something could have been.
How does that relate?Same as the evidence for it not existing. But even if it were empty, what is the value of pi when you don't have a circle?
It was fine tuned for the universe to exist and for life in it.Why will no one say why and for whom it was all 'fine tuned'?
OK it was fine tuned, but what did it and who was it done for?
Why is that pathetic? That is what scientists are claiming are you unaware?That is pathetic.
Just how plumb and how level can you get something?Yet another aspect of God that seems like it must have been fine tuned.
I did construction work for 50 years. Errors get bigger and bigger the further along you go. I can pretty much work with anything if it is within an inch. I have twice had to deal with four inches of sloppy error. Once when I was hanging a garage door and once when I was installing a kitchen. The kitchen was a lot more easy then the garage door. But when you look at the bubble it could still be in between the lines. If you are fifty feet away from this bubble you could have a huge amount of error. If you are a whole universe away from the beginning then the error could translate out to be huge.Why will no one say why and for whom it was all 'fine tuned'?
I did construction work for 50 years. Errors get bigger and bigger the further along you go. I can pretty much work with anything if it is within an inch. I have twice had to deal with four inches of sloppy error. Once when I was hanging a garage door and once when I was installing a kitchen. The kitchen was a lot more easy then the garage door. But when you look at the bubble it could still be in between the lines. If you are fifty feet away from this bubble you could have a huge amount of error. If you are a whole universe away from the beginning then the error could translate out to be huge.
I don't know enough about geology to say. However about the universe, that is what scientists have discovered and they have the scientific evidence that backs that claim. Could they be wrong, of course, but as of now that is what scientists are telling us.Is that what you believe? what else do the scientists say that you believe? they say there was no world wide flood do you believe that?
We are talking about fine tuning.Open a thread on construction.
Same as the evidence for it not existing. But even if it were empty, what is the value of pi when you don't have a circle?
It's pathetic that you would believe such nonsense as 'fine tuning' because it's an obvious creationist con.And again...what is pathetic?
It's pathetic that you would believe such nonsense as 'fine tuning' because it's an obvious creationist con.
We are talking about fine tuning.
I can not find any photos on line. I may have to get out my camera and take my own photos. I do have photos from when they were building the bridge across the river. How fine tuned do you think the support beams need to be in order to fit? If they do not fit how much are the workers able to force the beam in order to get it to fit? I will make you a bet. If you ask the workers building the bridge if they believe in mind over matter, I bet every one of them will say that they do. Remember getting the beam to FIT on one end may make it difficult to get it to fit on the other end.
You can have all your theories. I know how to get it to work in the real world. "When the rubber meets the road".
What is the value of pi when you look at a square?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?