• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Fantastic Adventist Today Article!

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
08-jan-feb-1.jpg


caught-in-the-middle-1_0.jpg
caught-in-the-middle-2.jpg


Caught in the Middle

January 1, 2008 - 12:00am - Dennis Hokama

They’re Adventists, but rather than Adventist distinctives, their focus is the cross of Christ. Where do evangelical Adventists fit in?

Laurel Dominesey loves Christ. For her, Jesus is a “real person” who wants a “real relationship.” She confidently identifies herself with Christianity. Christ, she says, is everything.
Dominesey, 20, attends church on Saturday, is enrolled at an Adventist college, and doesn’t eat pork. She believes in living a moral life and is happy to be identified as an Adventist.
But quietly, she grapples with reservations.
As a teenager, Dominesey, who was born Catholic, became particularly impressed by Adventism when she went on a mission trip with two Adventist friends. She talks warmly about her first experience at her home church near Buffalo, New York. “Nonjudgmental, accepting, welcoming … they notice you,” she says. “And people see you for you.”
But when Dominesey left her small Adventist church near Buffalo and discovered the wider world of Adventism, she felt confused. In Buffalo, she hadn’t considered the morality of jewelry or dairy products. “It was a shock. And it was frustrating,” she recalls. “People treated me as guilty of something. They assume you don’t have this relationship with God.”
Ironically, it was Dominesey’s relationship with God that offered freedom from the guilt laid on her. “Now that my heart has changed, I can see the good in Adventism,” she says, referring to individuals who have refreshed her with their authenticity. These individuals have helped her see the good things in the Adventist message, which she calls the “pilot light” that keeps her faith alive when emotion runs low—a foundation she supports and trusts.
In fact, Dominesey’s hesitation about Adventism doesn’t concern the fundamental beliefs themselves. “I don’t think there is a problem with the Church,” she says confidently. “I think there is a problem with some of the people in the Church. We need to see people for who they are … get to know their life. Let’s talk about things that really matter.”
For Dominesey, what really matters is Jesus. Yet the seemingly half-hearted gospel message in Adventism leaves her in reservation. Because the message that makes a wild fire of her faith seems to leave her church’s pilot light at a flicker.
Renee Harms, 31, was born and raised in Adventism. She is a graduate of Walla Walla University and a former resident of Portland, Oregon, where she loved her home church.
Now that she has moved to a new city in Utah, she has been disappointed with what she feels is a lack of vitality at the local Adventist churches. “I have yet to find an Adventist church that feels good when I walk in,” she says. “Generally, I sense an emphasis on religious Adventist practice before I get a sense of it being Spirit-filled.”
In the meantime, Harms is surrounded by new friends who are sincere non-Adventist Christians, and she has visited various evangelical churches in her area. “They are so approachable, love the Lord, and have this positive spiritual energy that I admire!” says Harms. “So how could I say that they are lacking?”
Pastor David Newman of the New Hope Adventist Church, a fast-growing and ethnically diverse congregation outside of Washington, D.C., has written extensively on the point of focus within the Adventist Church, particularly in North America.
“Adventism is experiencing great difficulties trying to decide whether the cross or the distinctives are our focus,” Newman says. “Two weeks ago an individual emailed me the experience they just went through in their local church. The key lay leader in the church told the whole congregation that people who hear about the Sabbath and do not accept it will not go to heaven. He continued that people like Billy Graham will not make it to heaven because he knows about the Sabbath but never accepted it. This mindset is especially prevalent in our smaller churches and in our rural churches.”
Newman says that when people hear about New Hope, he wants them to immediately recognize that they are Christ followers before knowing them as Sabbathkeepers.
“Some people believe that we can have a double focus,” says Newman. “That is impossible. Focus by definition must be on one object. The message of Adventism is not the Sabbath, end-time events, the sanctuary, health, etc. Important as they are, Jesus is the only way to eternal life. We believe that we can be thoroughly evangelical while being Adventist.”
The perspectives of Dominesey, Harms, and Newman represent those who feel a love for and loyalty to the Adventist Church but who often feel disappointed in the lack of gospel emphasis within the Church. They also raise important questions, such as: Who are the true Adventists? What does one need to believe to be an Adventist? And, finally, is being an evangelical Adventist a redundancy or an oxymoron?
What Is “Evangelical Adventism”?
Many of the features of evangelical Christianity were baptized into Adventism in 1957, when the Adventist Church published Seventh- day Adventists Answer Questions on Doctrine. It was written in response to questions posed by Walter Martin, author of the wellknown book Kingdom of the Cults (original printing 1965).
Martin, a Southern Baptist who made a career out of judging who was a cult and who was not, met with a group of Adventist scholars in order to ascertain whether Adventism should remain classified as a Christian cult or if it belonged to the sisterhood of Protestant churches.
The Adventists who worked with Martin answered enough of his questions correctly to receive a passing score by his reckoning, and on that basis, Adventists were thereafter no longer classified as a Christian cult. Evangelical Adventism had been born, though some influential traditional Adventists were not shy in questioning its paternity.
Larry Christoffel, associate pastor of the Campus Hill Church and an assistant professor of religion at Loma Linda University in Loma Linda, California, is a self-proclaimed evangelical. He says that evangelical Adventism is “authentic Adventism”—that it is “Adventism as God meant it to be.”
In an article Christoffel co-authored, “Evangelical Adventism: Clinging to the Old Rugged Cross,” he lists six salient answers in Questions on Doctrine that presumably differentiate evangelical Adventists from historic Adventists.
1. Scripture, not the writings of Ellen G. White, is the basis of Christian faith and practice.
2. Jesus Christ is eternally God and sinless in His human nature.
3. The substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ for the salvation of sinners was finished at the cross, though He continues a mediatorial work in heaven.
4. Justification is through faith on account of Christ’s accomplishments and is not in any way based on our obedience to the law.
5. Jesus Christ and Him crucified is to be the center of Seventhday Adventist belief and practice.
6. There are genuine, spiritually mature Christians outside of Seventh-day Adventism.
Some of the implications of these affirmations are that evangelical Adventists like Christoffel could not require baptismal candidates to avow any Adventist distinctive, so long as they declared “Christ and Him crucified.”
When Adventist Today spoke to Christoffel about this, he confirmed that he was happy to baptize people into Christ and did so without requiring any commitment to Adventist distinctives. But such a generic Christian baptism, he said, did not make them members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
Newman handles the baptism issue somewhat differently. “Everyone who joins New Hope,” says Newman, “whether by baptism or transfer has to take a class with me. And in that class I tell them that New Hope is Christian first and Adventist second. Then I explain what that means.”
With regard to a recurring concern for end-time events among Seventh-day Adventists, Christoffel believes that the gospel is inextricably linked to the Advent in the Bible itself, from Genesis to Revelation, citing Genesis 3:15, Isaiah 61:1,2, Matthew 24:14, and Revelation 14:6,7,14ff as examples. Therefore, he says, “Evangelical Adventism is a redundancy.”

http://www.atoday.com/magazine/2008/01/caught-middle
 

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Hopelessly Unchristian?

proclamation.jpg


At the other end of the spectrum we have Colleen Tinker, a former Adventist who now edits a bimonthly magazine called Proclamation!. Published by former Adventist minister Dale Ratzlaff’s Life Assurance Ministries, Proclamation! has a stated circulation of 35,000, all of which are sponsored and mailed out free of charge to North American Adventist pastors and others. Tinker believes that modern Adventism is incompatible with true Christianity. “The basic problem,” Tinker says, “is that Adventism grew up from a root of Arianism, which continues to influence Adventism’s doctrines.” Arianism teaches that Jesus was a created being, a doctrine that Tinker believes has severe theological implications. For example, says Tinker, if Jesus is not the eternal Almighty God, His death could not atone for the sin of creation, could not possess intrinsic eternal life, could not give us eternal life.
“One cannot simply graft the gospel onto Arianism and negate the influence of the original root,” says Tinker. “The root must be abandoned.”
Newman has followed the magazine’s arguments for several years. “They view the Adventist Church through a very narrow lens,” says Newman, who attended the Adventist Theological Seminary with Ratzlaff and had lunch with him last July. “Dale cannot understand how I can believe totally in grace, that you are saved by grace alone and nothing else, and still remain in the Adventist church. He sees the church as totally legalistic, totally focused on its distinctives, with no appreciation for the gospel.”
Newman describes Proclamation! as “strident,” comparing it to the tone of Walter Rea’s White Lie, and says Proclamation! buttresses its points by printing carefully selected quotes and ignoring any other evidence.
In its May-June 2007 issue, Proclamation! included an article by Ramone Romero, a former Adventist student missionary to Japan. In a piece titled “Giving Up the Family Altar,” Romero asserts that Adventism is hopelessly unchristian.
Romero’s quarrel is with progressive Adventists, who know the true history of the church and who can no longer agree with the theology of the pioneers and some of the visions of Ellen White, but who justify staying in the church by inventing their own private definitions of Adventism.
Romero argues that this is analogous to the practice of keeping altars to foreign gods—in this case, the Japanese Buddhist practice of having the eldest sibling keep the family “butsudan” in some corner of the house, which implies a worship of one’s ancestors long after becoming a Christian. Even though one no longer actually worships at this family altar and may consider it a harmless relic, Romero implies that it gives access to demonic forces that may literally attack occupants of the house.
Romero believes the gospel can be reduced to “Christ saved us,” so anything extra only competes with the gospel. Like Buddhist converts, says Romero, progressives think they can rationalize keeping the Adventist version of the butsudan in the house. But the real reason behind such rationalizations is that the family altar has demonic power over them.
Romero justifies comparing Adventism to a Buddhist ancestral altar by contrasting the gospel with the early beliefs of Adventism. The central truth of the gospel (justification by faith), says Romero, was missing for the first 40 years of Adventism, during which the major Adventist distinctives were formulated; anti-gospel beliefs were confirmed by Ellen White, who said she received instruction from “angel guides;” Ellen White and early Adventist teachings condemned those who clung to the [Protestant] gospel instead of the new Adventist teachings. Such a history, Romero asserts, can only lead one to conclude that the Adventist movement was led by a spirit other than the Holy Spirit.
All efforts to reform the church by reading Ellen White’s writings with “one eye closed” are doomed to failure, he says, because the fruits of historic Adventism (fear of the end times, insecurity of one’s salvation, cognitive dissonance, etc.) will continue to pop up as long as the root of historic Adventism is left intact. The only solution, he argues, is “throwing out the altar [whether it is the butsudan or Adventist heritage] ... [and] truly starting over.”
Adventists willing to take that risk, he says, will experience the “I once was lost, but now am found” transformation.
While many of Romero’s charges against the Adventist pioneers appear to be historically accurate, Romero’s claim that the central truth of the gospel (justification by faith) was missing from Adventism for the first 40 years is almost certainly unsupportable.
It is doubtful that any of the pioneers denied that the thief on the cross was instantly justified by faith for past sins. The pioneers wrote extensively about issues where they were in conflict with each other and with the rest of the Christian world. But it is an error in logic to conclude from the absence of writing about a noncontroversial belief—in this case, justification by faith—that the non-controversial belief itself was absent.
What was controversial was whether that instantaneous “justification by faith” the thief obtained from Jesus would have covered all the future thieving he might have committed had he been rescued at the last minute and lived to a ripe old age.
Adventist pioneers resisted the proposition that amounts to “once saved, always saved”—a highly problematic teaching that was nevertheless accepted by nearly all Protestant reformers—and one way they expressed opposition was in the Doctrine of Investigative Judgment. While it may arguably have been a rationalization of their Great Disappointment, the underlying reasoning can be explained in terms of concerns about the free will of humans being in tension with the sovereignty of God.
If the above is true, then the central truth of the gospel (justification by faith) was not missing for the first 40 years of Adventism, during which the major Adventist distinctives were formulated, but simply taken for granted.
Community and Belonging
Others say that being Adventist goes beyond a who-believes-what.
Dr. Rick Rice, professor of theology and religion at Loma Linda University and author of Believing, Behaving, and Belonging (2002), says a church cannot be reduced to merely a set of doctrines to be believed, or behavioral standards to be followed. It is a community to which one “belongs” in the richest sense of that word, and of those three dimensions, he argues, it is “belonging” that is paramount. Likewise, enlightened children can still embrace and cherish their “hopelessly” old-fashioned parents as family.
Christoffel agrees that being part of a faith community is more than ascribing to a set of beliefs. Adventist Today asked Christoffel how many, or which of the 28 fundamental beliefs were required to be a Seventh-day Adventist.
“You don’t have to believe in any of them!” says Christoffel. The preamble itself, he explains, says that Adventists have only the Bible as their creed and that the 28 fundamental beliefs represent only the present thinking of the church, which could change at a future General Conference session.
The desire to know for sure that one belongs to the “right” community of faith is at least as old as the rite of circumcision. But as the emphasis on outward circumcision shifted to an inward “circumcision of the heart,” the line of demarcation between outsiders and insiders became increasingly harder to draw.
The tension between evangelical Christianity and Adventism appears to be a continuation of that longstanding debate on a more abstract plane. Each attempt to devise or discern a new criterion is beset with difficulties because of the vast implications it has for God’s character—and the lack of agreement on how to interpret the Bible itself.
In the meantime, the ranks of evangelical Christians appear to be every bit as theologically diverse as Adventists themselves. Perhaps diversity on this matter need not be interpreted pejoratively. Who knows but that this diversity of belief among Christians is just what a sovereign God intended.

http://www.atoday.com/magazine/2008/01/caught-middle
 
Upvote 0

Avonia

Just look through the telescope . . .
Dec 13, 2007
1,345
36
✟16,813.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hopelessly Unchristian?

proclamation.jpg


At the other end of the spectrum we have Colleen Tinker, a former Adventist who now edits a bimonthly magazine called Proclamation!.


I don't know if they are on the same spectrum at all. AT has some well written articles, whether you agree with them or not. I've been thumbing through Proclamation since they first started sending me issues. It's like reading the same issue over, and over, and over again.

I also find it offensive that they only publish letters/comments from current Adventists that come off as militant whackos. And letters of support that all sound the same.

There was a post on this forum some time ago that used the phrase "Grace Legalists." Interesting.

But, if it's helpful for the community that's benefiting from it, then great. Personally, it feels quite small to me.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Once again, many of the references in this article are to 'emotion's'. I think that the 'disillusionment' among the youth of the SDA church is coming from all the 'hype' and ecstatic hoopla of the evangelical churches. They FEEL as though they are missing out on all the ‘fun’.

This is one of the dangers warned about in the great deception of these last days. “Emotionalism is confused with the true Spirit’. Coming from a Pentecostal background, I am well aware of its appeal to the feelings of the young whose emotions are of immense importance to them.

They also want to desperately ‘fit in’ with the rest of the world. Youth just HATE FEELING different. This too is behind the power of the evangelical movement. It’s really not about becoming more holy—but FEELING more holy irregardless of ones behavior.
The proof of this statement is confirmed with this article itself…

[FONT=&quot]Many of the features of evangelical Christianity were baptized into Adventism in 1957, when the [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Adventist[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Church[/FONT][FONT=&quot] published Seventh- day Adventists Answer Questions on Doctrine. It was written in response to questions posed by [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Walter[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Martin[/FONT][FONT=&quot], author of the well known book Kingdom of the Cults (original printing 1965).[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Martin, a Southern Baptist who made a career out of judging who was a cult and who was not, met with a group of Adventist scholars in order to ascertain whether Adventism should remain classified as a Christian cult or if it belonged to the sisterhood of Protestant churches.
The Adventists who worked with [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Martin[/FONT][FONT=&quot] answered enough of his questions correctly to receive a passing score by his reckoning, [/FONT][FONT=&quot](and who made him judge over our church?)[/FONT][FONT=&quot] and on that basis, Adventists were thereafter no longer classified as a Christian cult. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Evangelical Adventism had been born[/FONT][FONT=&quot], though some influential traditional Adventists were not shy in questioning its paternity.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]It’s not hard for the discerning eye to see that those who’s emotions and feelings lead and guide them would favor distancing themselves from an organization where calm, quiet FAITH is preferred and practiced.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I also find it extremely disturbing that the SDA people would cower to the likes of [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Walter[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Martin[/FONT][FONT=&quot] and his tacky attempts to villinize a movement that God Himself raised up. [/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

JonMiller

Senior Veteran
Jun 6, 2007
7,165
195
✟30,831.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Are you suggesting that He made a mistake? I would suggest that the stress comes from a misuse of the intelligence with which He endowed humans.

I don't find my search for knowledge stressful. It is the worry and concern about things in life that stresses me.

JM
 
Upvote 0

Mankin

A Strange Mixture of Random Components.
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2007
8,660
174
In the Norse Lands
✟77,451.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
BTW Night are there any evangelical Adventist churchs out there. Do you have any websites to links of them? Thanks.:thumbsup:


I despise the traditional view on church that we should all just sit there and listen to some guy ramble on about theology and how right Adventism is blah blah blah. It might be interesting to some but it puts most of youths asleep. Oh yeah honor some teens do care about being different otherwise there wouldn't be any emos.
 
Upvote 0

Avonia

Just look through the telescope . . .
Dec 13, 2007
1,345
36
✟16,813.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
In Relationship
It’s not hard for the discerning eye to see that those who’s emotions and feelings lead and guide them would favor distancing themselves from an organization where calm, quiet FAITH is preferred and practiced

Honor, I'm hoping you can receive this in the same playful way I am typing it. But I can't help but smiling at this post given that your posts at least APPEAR to be right up there when it comes to emotional overtone!

You see the irony . . . yes?

But I know that's because you care!
 
Upvote 0

sentipente

Senior Contributor
Jul 17, 2007
11,651
4,492
Silver Sprint, MD
✟54,142.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Politics
US-Others
I don't find my search for knowledge stressful. It is the worry and concern about things in life that stresses me.

JM
If you are truly worried and concern that should send you to find the answer instead of defending old ways that have not found the answer.
 
Upvote 0

JonMiller

Senior Veteran
Jun 6, 2007
7,165
195
✟30,831.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If you are truly worried and concern that should send you to find the answer instead of defending old ways that have not found the answer.

I am not sure what you are trying to say?

I stress about the future and finding a job/etc, things that the Bible says we shouldn't stress over.

JM
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Honor, I'm hoping you can receive this in the same playful way I am typing it. But I can't help but smiling at this post given that your posts at least APPEAR to be right up there when it comes to emotional overtone!

You see the irony . . . yes?

But I know that's because you care!
Hi Avonia--no worries, and no offense taken. But I don't confuse zealousness of opinion with emotionalism in worship styles.

I think we really need to be careful to not confuse the two.

And I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with showing our emotions for gratefulness and love to God. Many times as I sit in church or home, tears of love and joy will overflow. Or while listening to uplifting gospel music my heart is transported to feeling of extreme emotions for God.

But please keep in mind my Pentecostal background where I saw emotional ecstacy taken to a level that was anything but Godly. It sickens me to see this very real threat over taking our SDA youth.

 
Upvote 0

Avonia

Just look through the telescope . . .
Dec 13, 2007
1,345
36
✟16,813.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hi Avonia--no worries, and no offense taken. But I don't confuse zealousness of opinion with emotionalism in worship styles.

I think we really need to be careful to not confuse the two.

And I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with showing our emotions for gratefulness and love to God. Many times as I sit in church or home, tears of love and joy will overflow. Or while listening to uplifting gospel music my heart is transported to feeling of extreme emotions for God.

But please keep in mind my Pentecostal background where I saw emotional ecstacy taken to a level that was anything but Godly. It sickens me to see this very real threat over taking our SDA youth.


Gottcha!
 
Upvote 0

sentipente

Senior Contributor
Jul 17, 2007
11,651
4,492
Silver Sprint, MD
✟54,142.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Politics
US-Others
Hi Avonia--no worries, and no offense taken. But I don't confuse zealousness of opinion with emotionalism in worship styles.

I think we really need to be careful to not confuse the two.
The difference is only in the expression. The same thing drives the two.
 
Upvote 0