Fake News (why russia is not the only proof of it existing)

[createdtoworship]

 

[Yarddog]

Like I said in OP fake news only focuses on negative news because of the shock and awe of it. Here is one story you won't see cnn, abc, and others cover:

Donald Trump offers 'help' to terminally-ill baby Charlie Gard

no wonder many people don't think trump is doing anything in office, because they only listen to main stream media, and only get a negative slant.

Maybe you should pay more attention. A Google search shows stories from all the sources which you falsely accused.

 

[Yarddog]

If anything that would mean that obama was spying on people protected by the constitution and the sources should be legal, so this does not prove your point it proves mine.

??? How does that do anything to my point? Did you read it?

 

[tulc]

You mean like this:
Charlie Gard: Pope, Trump offer support to child's parents - CNN.com

Did you notice this? I thought you'd like to change your post where you said they wouldn't ever say anything about it.
tulc(seems only fair to correct an error in a thread about fake news)

 

[tulc]

read the op again, and again, and again, until you have it memorized. Then maybe your questions will be answered. I have answered the same exact question three times.

And I have explained that if you only answer questions about the OP why can't you post a link about where those 500,000 jobs you brought up in the OP are. It's right there in the OP.
tulc(or...gradyll could just admit they aren't real and edit that part of the OP out?)

 

[SolomonVII]

It does no good for you to post a thread which we cannot access without donating to the site.

I have never donated to the site and I have always been able to access the site.

 

[SolomonVII]

any chance of a link for that one and that they were because of President Trump?
tulc(wonders why it even needs to be asked at this point)

I found it and so can you!

 

[Yarddog]

I would like the source for your quote about psychiatry and negative reactions, because I don't think it exists as a independant study, but more often you are a byproduct of fake news, by trusting left leaning sources.

There are a number of different papers written on this but here is one.
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology

 

[SolomonVII]

Nothing illigitimate about those contacts unless something illigitimate was being discussed.

American spy networks can spy on foreigners legitimately. Spies do not have the right to spy on American citizens. Government operatives are obliged to blank the names of Americans out of those conversations when they are inadvertently a part of the spy investigation on foreigners.
To leak the names of Americans caught up in such spy networks is an illegal act. This is so because, constitutionally, America is not a police state where spying on its own citizens without a warrant is deemed to be a legitimate activity.
Any full covering of a news story would have made these illegal leaks front and centre of the coverage. This would be important for a liberal press interested in the liberty of American citizens and their right to privacy from unwarranted searches.

The fact that you are aware of the story, but unaware of the illegality of American citizens being unmasked by partisan leaks demonstrates well enough the bias of the news networks.

Fake news.

 

[tulc]

I found it and so can you!

Not real clear on how this works huh? )
tulc(What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence)

 

[Yarddog]

can you prove alex jones and rush limbaugh are fake news, because we can prove CNN is fake news. Just read the op.

All statements involving Rush Limbaugh | PolitiFact

 

[SolomonVII]

Not real clear on how this works huh? )
tulc(What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence)

This is the part of the OP that interests you. It doesn't much interest me, but I took a look anyway and found the story within 1 minute.
If you were really interested in that story, you would invest a minute.
Since you are unwilling to do a minute of leg work to discover the facts behind the story, you are simply not interesting enough to me to continue a conversation with.
That is how it works, with me.
Bye By tulc.

 

[createdtoworship]

Maybe you should pay more attention. A Google search shows stories from all the sources which you falsely accused.

I only saw foreign news agencies. any evidence? ABC, MSNBC, CNN, NYT & TWP all ignore

 

[createdtoworship]

All statements involving Rush Limbaugh | PolitiFact

they are quoting him out of context

 

[createdtoworship]

There are a number of different papers written on this but here is one.
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology

non sequitur, you would need to quote the document you sourced with your premise. You can't simply google search after the fact, non sequitur.

 

[createdtoworship]

I see no comments on these lies from the media, about ten or 12 of them. Try addressing the op for once.

 

[SolomonVII]

andrew klavan fake news youtube - Bing video

 

[createdtoworship]

At least they admitted it, and that is the first step in fake news addiction. Next step is realizing you are powerless, & when you are called out on it, that you still cannot quit publishing fake news. It's called a cycle of bondage.

 

[createdtoworship]

scott foval spilled the beans on voter fraud, but you don't hear MSM (fake news) relaying this info do you?

 

[createdtoworship]

andrew klavan fake news youtube - Bing video

it's blocked on my cpu, but I will check it out on my phone.