Facts To Prove The Theory Of Evolution

[Larniavc]

It's not, it actually helps fighting diseases

So why bring it up?

 

[BeyondET]

Okay, citation on that please.

Its called gold bsse therapy

Gold-based therapy: From past to present

Despite an abundant literature on gold nanoparticles use for biomedicine, only a few of the gold-based nanodevices are currently tested in clinical trials, and none of them are approved by health agencies. Conversely, ionic gold has been used for decades ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[BeyondET]

So why bring it up?

Why not does it make you nervous

 

[Hans Blaster]

Yes there's gold in them there blood hills.

Your blood is gold! Learn about components of blood and symptoms and treatment of blood disorders | Medicover Genetics

An adult human body contains approximately 5 liters of blood, which contains different metals such as iron, chromium, and zinc, as well as about 0.2 milligrams...

medicover-genetics.com

This article uses gold as a metaphor while noting the quantity of gold in the blood. It says nothing about information transmission via blood or what the gold does.

Electrical Signals of Nerve Cells - Neuroscience - NCBI Bookshelf

This book does mention "gold" twice. Once a reference the size of something else (the size of a gold atom) and the other time to label a color in a plot). This book says nothing about the use of gold in neurotransmission.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It's not for sell and the humanbody doesn't need much like copper.

Of course it's not for sale, but you've also not once mentioned what it's for in the human body.

Its called gold bsse therapy

And what does that have to do with the gold that's in the human body?! It doesn't help our immune system, you don't get doctors saying "Oh, you've got low gold levels in your system, take these gold supplements". In the human body, it's a worthless product that does nothing. And you're going around like you've stumbled onto the mystery of life vis a vis evolution and gold in the human body.

 

[Larniavc]

Why not does it make you nervous

But I don't see why gold being in the body is relevant in a thread about evidence that is a problem for ToE. Can you explain that?

 

[Astrid]

The theory of evolution will never be "proven" as absolute truth. So in that sense, no evidence we show you, however compelling, will ever "prove" the theory of evolution.

Scientific Proof Is A Myth

We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That's an impossibility for science.

www.forbes.com

You been told that you have been told this several times several times that science cannot prove things are true. That you keep ignoring this and anything else you are presented with is hard to fathom.

Scientific Proof Is A Myth

We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That's an impossibility for science.

www.forbes.com

 

[BeyondET]

This article uses gold as a metaphor while noting the quantity of gold in the blood. It says nothing about information transmission via blood or what the gold does.


This book does mention "gold" twice. Once a reference the size of something else (the size of a gold atom) and the other time to label a color in a plot). This book says nothing about the use of gold in neneurotransmission

I'm sorry you don't believe elements plays a rule in life, including gold, you certainly know copper and zinc do don't you?

 

[BeyondET]

But I don't see why gold being in the body is relevant in a thread about evidence that is a problem for ToE. Can you explain that?

What is ToE ?

 

[Hans Blaster]

I'm sorry you don't believe elements plays a rule in life, including gold, you certainly know copper and zinc do don't you?

That's a leap. I said nothing of the sort. Are you always that sloppy with your replies? Don't answer, none of this is on topic anyway.

 

[Astrid]

Just because both you and estrid don't have a great grasp of the scientific language does not mean that there is no evidence for evolution, as has been told and shown to you repeatedly. It's not on us that you've flat out ignored it and rejected it time and again.

What are you saying about me??

 

[BeyondET]

That's a leap. I said nothing of the sort. Are you always that sloppy with your replies? Don't answer, none of this is on topic anyway.

Not as sloppy as you saying gold is used as a metaphor. That's a total mess

 

[Astrid]

Why would you guess that? I examine different things on a case by case basis.

I didn't claim to have critically analysed it myself. But I am literate, and can read what others have done.

If you can read, read this

Scientific Proof Is A Myth

We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That's an impossibility for science.

www.forbes.com

 

[Astrid]

Again, if you read the thread title, I'm not asking for evidence, I'm asking for proof, and obviously this was prompted by the other thread where someone was asking for disproof. It cuts both ways.

No. It doesn't.

Scientific Proof Is A Myth

We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That's an impossibility for science.

www.forbes.com

 

[Hans Blaster]

Not as sloppy as you saying gold is used as a metaphor. That's a total mess.

That's the whole reason "gold" was in the title of that article. Sheesh.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What are you saying about me??

I shall apologise, I was saying that you were incorrect in your usage of the word 'disprove' when in fact you were very much correct in using the word disprove whereas chesteron is not correct in the slightest of his use of the word proof.

I'm sorry.

 

[AV1611VET]

What are you saying about me??

He's probably saying that you don't have a "great grasp" of the scientific language.

And I'll add, that for that to happen, one must invest a lot of their treasure in an academic setting.

You know ... go to college and stuff?

Else you're a layman.

Like almost all of us here.

 

[AV1611VET]

I shall apologise, I was saying that you were incorrect in your usage of the word 'disprove' when in fact you were very much correct in using the word disprove whereas chesteron is not correct in the slightest of his use of the word proof.

I'm sorry.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

At least I admitted that I messed up.

Probably that you don't have a "great grasp" of the scientific language.

For that to happen, one must invest a lot of their treasure in an academic setting.

You know ... go to college and stuff?

Else you're a layman.

Like almost all of us here.

And you can also not put words into my mouth on the whole situation since it makes you look very unchristian. Blessed are the muckspreaders?

 

[AV1611VET]

At least I admitted that I messed up.

And you can also not put words into my mouth on the whole situation since it makes you look very unchristian. Blessed are the muckspreaders?

Only the first sentence, warden.

Here ... I'll go back and correct it.