Sadly, IMO Tibetan "Buddhism" has apparently deviated greatly from the historical Buddha's teachings.Tibetan Buddhism should really be styled Tibetan "Buddhism," with the Buddhism in quotes, because what the Tibetans practice is a mixture of sorcery and superstition of the worst kind, concealed beneath a veneer of Buddhism. Westerners are drawn in by the talk of peace and happiness, only to find themselves victimized to a shocking extent by their supposed "teachers." The guru-cult would be more accurately styled "Lamaism" -- a fact that has been known in the West since the nineteenth century, but is rarely acknowledged.
In 1996 June Campbell shattered Tibetan Buddhism's anodyne image by publishing Traveller in Space. The world learned that Tibetan Buddhism, beneath its talk of compassion and altruism, was in fact an abusive sex cult that controlled the lives of its adherents through fear and superstition.
More recently, Christine Chandler has published an exposé titled Enthralled: The Guru Cult of Tibetan Buddhism. Here we learn not only of the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism but also of its enablers and protectors in the West.
Recently I came across a third offering on the subject, Exposing Deeds of Darkness: Becoming Non-Attached to That Which Teaches Non-Attachment by Donald and Cheryl Lynne Rubbo.
What is interesting about Exposing Deeds of Darkness is that the Rubbos ultimately found their freedom in Jesus Christ.
Tibetan Buddhism should really be styled Tibetan "Buddhism," with the Buddhism in quotes, because what the Tibetans practice is a mixture of sorcery and superstition of the worst kind, concealed beneath a veneer of Buddhism. Westerners are drawn in by the talk of peace and happiness, only to find themselves victimized to a shocking extent by their supposed "teachers." The guru-cult would be more accurately styled "Lamaism" -- a fact that has been known in the West since the nineteenth century, but is rarely acknowledged.
What makes Donald and Cheryl Lynne Rubbo unique is that they kept up a belief in God throughout their involvement in Tibetan "Buddhism," and this despite the fact that neither had a Christian upbringing. They left their "Buddhist" master in 2006, but for many years experienced medical and financial problems they attributed to his malevolence. It was not until 2013 that they began to spontaneously cry out to God for help.
They were then moved to buy a Bible and began to read, though not through any denominational or doctrinal lens. It was through this unfiltered reading of the Bible that they found their way to Jesus.
I don't think the authors ever joined any particular denomination. At one point they suggest that, having been part of a cult, they never want to be part of any organization ever again. They did, though, seek out help from kindred spirits on the Internet.
The book seems to have been self-published, and I think it could have benefited from some editorial pruning and re-shaping. Apart from this, I found it well-written and informative.
Early Buddhism is a missionary religion; in the Mahakhandhaka Vinaya (Pi Tv Kd 1), we see the Buddha sending out sixty arahants:Buddhism isn't an evangelical religion.
This is big in my reality. I am shocked and disappointed. I should be used to guru's disappointing me by now and yet I am disturbed and upset by this report. This is why I came back to Christianity; I can only trust Lord Jesus Christ. Clearly from many posts on CF many pastors and churches are not trustworthy either, despite everyone's insistence that Christianity requires church going fellowship.It's not a matter of a few bad apples. The books make the case that abuse, and the conditions that lead to abuse, are part of the system:
More consequences of the system come to light: Sogyal Rinpoche and the abuse accusations rocking the Buddhist world
- Commitment to keep it all secret -- part of the system
- Committing to never criticize the guru, no matter what -- part of the system
- Traumatizing little boys by removing them from their parents at the age of three or four years old -- part of the system
Early Buddhism is a missionary religion; in the Mahakhandhaka Vinaya (Pi Tv Kd 1), we see the Buddha sending out sixty arahants:
Then the Lord addressed the monks, saying: “I, monks, am freed from all snares, both those of devas and those of men. And you, monks, are freed from all snares, both those of devas and those of men. Walk, monks, on tour for the blessing of the manyfolk, for the happiness of the manyfolk out of compassion for the world, for the welfare, the blessing, the happiness of devas and men. Let not two (of you) go by one (way.) Monks, teach dhamma which is lovely at the beginning, lovely in the middle, lovely at the ending. Explain with the spirit and the letter the Brahma-faring completely fulfilled, wholly pure. There are beings with little dust in their eyes, who, not hearing dhamma, are decaying, (but) if they are learners of dhamma, they will grow. And I, monks, will go along to Uruvelā, to the Camp township, in order to teach dhamma.”
"Christianity requires church going fellowship" is kind of an ambiguous statement. Lots of people might take that to mean that salvation requires church going fellowship, which is absolutely wrong. Faith and trust in Jesus Christ is the only thing that can save us. Salvation is by Jesus only, not Jesus plus church, or Jesus plus baptism, or Jesus plus anything else for that matter. Because that mixes grace with works, which is a false gospel that can't save anyone. (Not saying that you believe that church attendance is required for salvation, I'm just that anyone who does say that is wrong.)This is big in my reality. I am shocked and disappointed. I should be used to guru's disappointing me by now and yet I am disturbed and upset by this report. This is why I came back to Christianity; I can only trust Lord Jesus Christ. Clearly from many posts on CF many pastors and churches are not trustworthy either, despite everyone's insistence that Christianity requires church going fellowship.