Then your point ... that science has all of reality to support it ... can take a hike.
If science has all of reality to support it, why does the moon have six different 'realities' as to how we got it?
And if it only has one 'reality' supporting it, why does that 'reality' share itself with five other theories?
Geez, how blind are you? Read what I said, because it answers your question.
We have some evidence, and there's several different explanations which fit the evidence. But there's not enough evidence to eliminate all of them. So there are several theories, all of which match THE EVIDENCE WE HAVE AVAILABLE. Once more evidence becomes available, we will be able to eliminate some of those theories until we only have one left.
See that bit? It answers your question.
Open your eyes next time and pay attention.
Upvote
0