That's a good one, Alfro
I came to Christianity through scholarly study, from atheism of all places. I know there is heavy, heavy studies that go in both directions (yes there is a trinity, and no there is not). I've seen and researched all sides of this battle in the past.
In the end, what I do know is exactly what DH (buddy_holly) has already described. All parts of this matter are still important. All parts of the trinity, be there one or not, are important.
Whether or not they
are a trinity to me, is almost a none-issue, because it doesn't change my faith a whole lot.
That being said, at this point in my life and from my past research, I have decided myself upon belief in the trinity. While there is no place that says in a few words "This is the trinity", there is also none that says "There is not a trinity". If you bring that together with the pieces in areas of the Bible that do support trinity doctrine, this is enough for me to put at least temporary confidence in the issue at hand (the trinity).
For me, many things of God will never be concrete. I'm sure God will be happy to explain them to me in detail at some point after I die

Until then, I'm happy saying "I'm not sure, but this is the closest I can come to understanding it."
For some, this is not good enough. Eh, I'm human,
I'm not good enough technically speaking

So I'm ok with resigning myself to "close enough" answers from time to time when it does not impact too much of my faith.
So I'm ok with the clover analysis, it makes sense. But I also see the point of view from people who do not completely put faith in the idea behind it. I could spend all day showing you articles on both sides of things, however this is not the place. We do have areas of CF available to debate this topic if anyone is interested, just so you know
