Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hi Again Sir, Mr. CherubRamThere were two calendars in use in Christ day, the biblical Solar Calendar, and the Civil Lunar Calendar. Which one do you think Christ and the disciples used? Friday evening to Sunday morning is 1.5 days.
The Hebrew or Jewish calendar is a lunisolar calendar used today predominantly for Jewish religious observances. It determines the dates for Jewish holidays.Hi Again Sir, Mr. CherubRam
Yes, I had posted the url for the one I referenced in a previous post. Since the Gospel writers were all Jewish, with the exception of Luke who mostly wrote for Saul of Tarsus (a Jew of Benjamite heritage), my accounting therefore is based on the Hebrew Calendar. For ease I will reference it again so you don't have to bother to search for it.
http://www.cgsf.org/dbeattie/calendar/?roman=31
In Christ, Patrick
For the record regarding the accuracy of the Calendars used here:The Hebrew or Jewish calendar is a lunisolar calendar used today predominantly for Jewish religious observances. It determines the dates for Jewish holidays.
Essene practice was almost diametrically opposite from what Jesus taught His disciples as well as what He commanded them to do - Go out to the ends of the earth and share the Good News and to those who believe make disciples baptizing them in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit and the Gospel must be preached to every ethne' before the end will come; but I shall be with you Always, even to the end of the age. That is all radically different than Essene teaching - but perhaps some Essenes saw in Jesus the fulfillment of prophesy, leaving their dogma behind to embrace Christ.One factor might be that Jesus and his early followers were probably Essene-type Jews. The Essenes disagreed with other Jews on the dating of festivals and the calendar in general. There was a practice among non-Essenes to tinker with the calendar so that the Sabbath and certain festival days would not interfere with each other. The Community Rule of the Dead Sea Scrolls condemns this practice. In addition, the Essenes seem to have used a solar calendar whereas the other Jews used a lunisolar calendar.
I don't know if this website's information is reliable, but it came up in google:
Essene Calendar
Hi Patrick,So if you want to count a few minutes as a whole day that's up to you
Christians typically confuse that with believing what Paul had to say about Jesus.knowing Jesus as your Lord and Savior [matters]
Hello Again Theo,Hi Patrick,
The verse I posted from Luke 24:20 show that Luke is talking about the crucified man being delivered earlier in the day, so counting the first day isn't about arguing over a few minutes.
Christians typically confuse that with believing what Paul had to say about Jesus.
Yes, I quite agree Hank! Please provide the source! Amazing!Source please. Thanks
Traditions vs Scripture as well as the Calendar really are two different things. It's always best to look under the hood to see what drives us in a particular direction. Even in the early Church there were differences and disagreements on the celebrations of Holy week as both Jerome and Irenaeus attest toI always wondered this too. When Jesus was crucified on Friday evening and buried on Friday night and raised from the dead Sunday morning wasn't he only dead for a day and a bit? Which is why some people claim he was crucified on Wednesday and not Friday. Yet we celebrate good Friday and Easter as days celebrating his death and resurrection. I'm clearly missing something here.
The biblical calendar has been in use long before the Christian Era. The Hebrews started to use the Lunar Calendar in 167 BC.For the record regarding the accuracy of the Calendars used here:
The “Hebrew” years shown on this web site match the Rabbinic calendar which has been in use by the majority of the Jews at least since the writing of Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah (1170‑1180 AD). (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_calendar and related articles). This is a calculated calendar, with the beginnings of months and years established by Rabbinic rules for computation and “postponements” of new moons. The calculations result in months and years that approximate, but are not in complete harmony with the natural lunar and solar cycles.
The “Hebrew” years illustrated here prior to the time of Maimonides are hypothetical, superimposing the Rabbinic computations backward in time through 142 AD. Prior to 142 AD the same Rabbinic methods of computation are used here, except that a change in the arrangement of leap years was made to “correct” a presumed calendar drift.
Hi Patrick,Hi Again Theo,
I wanted to add an addendum. Here is Golgotha, the place of the skull and the Garden tomb nearby. It is representative of the tour you might receive if you were to physically go there. I have been here and so believe this will help augment your understanding of the events as recorded in Scripture.
In Christ, Patrick
Hi Theo,Hi Patrick,
I don't see how your last two posts are relevant to your timeline.
Your timeline is obviously relevant to your argument, but I haven't seen you make any point that would overcome your problem with Luke's testimony of the discovery of the empty tomb at around dawn on the third day. IOW Crucifixion on the first day, and then two sabbaths for your timeline mean that the discovery would have happened on the fourth day by Luke's reckoning, not the third.Okay, so if you believe my time estimate is irrelevant to the discussion...
Dear Sir,Your timeline is obviously relevant to your argument, but I haven't seen you make any point that would overcome your problem with Luke's testimony of the discovery of the empty tomb at around dawn on the third day. IOW Crucifixion on the first day, and then two sabbaths for your timeline mean that the discovery would have happened on the fourth day by Luke's reckoning, not the third.
Yes, but you're not bringing anything new to the table that's relevant to the point that Luke started counting days on the day before the first sabbath of your timeline.It wasn't simply a discovery that the tomb was empty.
Yes, but you're not bringing anything new to the table that's relevant to the point that Luke started counting days on the day before the first sabbath of your timeline.
You said: "As I reiterated before the days were reckoned as in Genesis, as evening first, morning", but this doesn't affect my argument.
Theo said:Luke 24:21
- You can't unless you throw out Luke. Days were counted inclusively, meaning that on morning of the the third day only one full day and two full nights would have passed since the body was placed in the tomb.
- But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?