Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is typical of someone that hasn't really had any education in Biblical history.How much of the Quran is true?
Any sentence can be made to say whatever you want it to say, even America is mentioned in the bible,
'And they entered a land of plenty and the multitude did go forth unto their estates', surly it's talking about the US,
where else do they have estates? apart from every where on earth?
There are a couple of sure fire ways to make money, write a book about religion or start your own religion, either way the religious will pay a lot of money for both.
Would you buy a book that told you that what you wanted to believe was in fact true?
Could you give me ten examples of macro evolution using evidence provided by science. What I mean is evidence that one type of organism evolved into another using scientific discovery excluding the whale. Thanks.How far of a hike?
If you accept micro, but not macro, I'd be curious what distinction you draw between them other than degree. Or alternatively, I suppose you could say the last 6000 years of evolution happened, but anything longer than that couldn't because your interpretation of the bible dictates that nothing older than 6000 years actually happened.
This shows again that you know little about the Quran or the Bible.Like Maurice Bucaille. Only he said those things about the Quran.
You can find them in every religion if you look hard enough.
Okay.Evolution doesn't explain how or why sex came about at all. Sex is one element in evolution that remains unexplained and even some think it doesn't seem to fit at all. Why go to all that trouble and necessity for two organisms to reproduce.
Evolution doesn't explain how or why sex came about at all.
Could you give me ten examples of macro evolution using evidence provided by science. What I mean is evidence that one type of organism evolved into another using scientific discovery excluding the whale. Thanks.
This shows again that you know little about the Quran or the Bible.
The store and the edifice across the country are not related.
In macroevolution, I drive to Store A, then I drive across the country to Store B and should find it related to Store A.
What do you know about Jesus? stories?Including Jesus?
What is biblical history? what part of the bible is history apart from some place names?This is typical of someone that hasn't really had any education in Biblical history.
i'm not sure science itself knows what the distinction is.
only recently have they come up with a possible theory that could be empirically tested.
from the review:
Lest Six Day Creationists and Intelligent Design advocates see Parker's book as support for their readings of Scripture, Parker is at pains to dismiss such arguments. In no way is he trying to suggest that Genesis 1 is a scientific account.
The dangers with a book like this is that in writing such an honest account of one's pondering about faith and the origin of life, the writer leaves himself open to criticism from absolutely everyone. Some scientists will critique his science, Christian's may critique his reading of Genesis, theologians might question his reading of Scripture and his understanding of God, and historians could question some of the historical analysis.
from the author:
But I must admit, rather nervously as a scientist averse to entertaining such an idea, that the evidence that the writer of the opening page of the Bible was divinely inspired is strong. I have never before encountered such powerful, impartial evidence to suggest that the Bible is the product of divine inspiration.
Of course I can drive to both.You can drive to the store, but you can't drive across the country? Really?
Either that, or you misread what I said.Loudmouth said:You must be one of those people who are able to put one foot in front of the other, but are completely baffled as to how you can walk to the curb.
I do not believe in macroevolution.Loudmouth said:In macroevolution, it is nothing more than repeated microevolutionary events, just as you repeatedly put one foot in front of the other to walk from your porch to the curb.
It's not how much of Him I know that really counts.What do you know about Jesus? stories?
I do not believe in macroevolution.
In macroevolution, once I got from the porch to the curb, I would have to observe that both the porch and the curb are related to each other somehow.
The point would be the same: macroevolution is a joke.
No, but then you would give up your right to call it our ninth ...If I said that I believed Pluto does not exist, would it disappear?
No they are not.Loudmouth said:They are related through each step that links them.
What insult?Loudmouth said:When sticking your head in the sand doesn't work, insults are the next salvo.
Rachel Evans prioritized though.
That's not what I meant.I think she prioritized a quest for honesty.
That's not what I meant.
Rachel Evans got saved first, then went backsliding.
At least YECs led her to Christ.
Some people who believe in evolution get saved, but don't give up their philosophy.
So they don't really backslide, per se.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?