Ex-NFL Player Slams Minnesota AG Ellison for His Lawsuit Against Trump Admin Over Ban on Boys Playing Girls’ Sports

[RileyG]

Some schools have adopted policies that allow students to transition socially at school without parental notification or consent. This can include using a different name and pronouns, and in some cases, accessing facilities that align with their gender identity.
And what does he call drag queen story hour?

That’s not cool.

 

[rjs330]

But not mentally or emotionally. Yeah, we get it, that's the MAGA line. But research is beginning to show that there are (biological) brain differences between men and women which apparently occur in trans people, too.

No it doesn't. There is no valid research that shows Trans brains are any different than the brains of their biological sex.

 

[Hans Blaster]

No it doesn't. There is no valid research that shows Trans brains are any different than the brains of their biological sex.

What makes that research not "valid"? Please demonstrate using scientific principles.

 

[BPPLEE]

What makes that research not "valid"? Please demonstrate using scientific principles.

What research?

 

[rjs330]

What makes that research not "valid"? Please demonstrate using scientific principles.

What makes that research not "valid"? Please demonstrate using scientific principles.

When he actually posts some research I'll point it out.

 

[Hans Blaster]

When he actually posts some research I'll point it out.

Here's a review paper where you can start it covers the neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation:

Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation - PMC

Sexual identity and sexual orientation are independent components of a person’s sexual identity. These dimensions are most often in harmony with each other and with an individual’s genital sex, although not always. The present review discusses the ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[rjs330]

Here's a review paper where you can start it covers the neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation:

Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation - PMC

Sexual identity and sexual orientation are independent components of a person’s sexual identity. These dimensions are most often in harmony with each other and with an individual’s genital sex, although not always. The present review discusses the ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Spare me. Ive read every piece of so called evidence to this stuff, including this one.

Evidence of a genetic contribution to transsexuality is very limited.21 There are few reports of family and twin studies of transsexuals but none offer clear support for the involvement of genetic factors.

Overall, these genetic studies are inconclusive and a role for genes in gender identity remains unsettled.

The evidence that prenatal hormones affect the development of gender identity is stronger but far from proven.

However, in some cases, the interpretation of these studies is complicated by hormone treatments, small sample sizes and a failure to disentangle correlates of sexual orientation from gender identity.

Bottom line this study suffers the same problems as all the others. The in ability to actually test the findings, small sample sizes and corollary issues such as hormone treatments and other factors. This is just another very poor study that cannot really give any diffinitive conclusion.

I'm not going to go through every study you happen to throw out there. So dont bother. I have some more reading g and research on this subject than you can imagine. Ive read every single thing any trans ideologues have thrown out there. And the facts are isn't anything of that actually supports any theory that Trans people have different brains that is scientifically sound and reliable.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Spare me. Ive read every piece of so called evidence to this stuff, including this one.

Sure, you have. Seems likely. Now let's see if you have a reason why such research is not *VALID*.

Evidence of a genetic contribution to transsexuality is very limited.21 There are few reports of family and twin studies of transsexuals but none offer clear support for the involvement of genetic factors.

Overall, these genetic studies are inconclusive and a role for genes in gender identity remains unsettled.

The evidence that prenatal hormones affect the development of gender identity is stronger but far from proven.

What is the "21". Did you copy-paste this from some source that you didn't link?

However, in some cases, the interpretation of these studies is complicated by hormone treatments, small sample sizes and a failure to disentangle correlates of sexual orientation from gender identity.

Bottom line this study suffers the same problems as all the others. The in ability to actually test the findings, small sample sizes and corollary issues such as hormone treatments and other factors. This is just another very poor study that cannot really give any diffinitive conclusion.

It was a review paper, not a study. Even if this was a criticism of a single study, you didn't state why the work is invalid. I don't think you understand how science works, what makes a study valid, or even what a study is.

I'm not going to go through every study you happen to throw out there. So dont bother.

You asked for some research, I gave you one review paper and you can't tell me what is wrong with it. There is no way I would waste time digging up more things for you to pooh-pooh.

I have some more reading g and research on this subject than you can imagine. Ive read every single thing any trans ideologues have thrown out there. And the facts are isn't anything of that actually supports any theory that Trans people have different brains that is scientifically sound and reliable.

I don't believe you for one second.

 

[A2SG]

Sure, you have. Seems likely. Now let's see if you have a reason why such research is not *VALID*.

What is the "21". Did you copy-paste this from some source that you didn't link?


It was a review paper, not a study. Even if this was a criticism of a single study, you didn't state why the work is invalid. I don't think you understand how science works, what makes a study valid, or even what a study is.


You asked for some research, I gave you one review paper and you can't tell me what is wrong with it. There is no way I would waste time digging up more things for you to pooh-pooh.

I don't believe you for one second.

Yeah...a while back, I recall presenting similar evidence to this poster on this very subject. I stated at the time that, while the studies were not conclusive and did not claim to be absolute proof, they did provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that the brain chemistry of trans women is more similar to biological women than to men. His response was to say it wasn't conclusive (which I admitted at the onset), and therefore was invalid. So he's saying much the same now as he did then.

-- A2SG, he has me on ignore, so this is just between you and me, Hans....

 

[rjs330]

Sure, you have. Seems likely. Now let's see if you have a reason why such research is not *VALID*.

What is the "21". Did you copy-paste this from some source that you didn't link?


It was a review paper, not a study. Even if this was a criticism of a single study, you didn't state why the work is invalid. I don't think you understand how science works, what makes a study valid, or even what a study is.


You asked for some research, I gave you one review paper and you can't tell me what is wrong with it. There is no way I would waste time digging up more things for you to pooh-pooh.

I don't believe you for one second.

Lol I QUOTED the paper. The one you linked. The paper that admitted the problems in the studies. I quoted the problems that make the studies scientifically unreliable and thus invalid.

You should read your sources more thoroughly.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Lol I QUOTED the paper. The one you linked. The paper that admitted the problems in the studies. I quoted the problems that make the studies scientifically unreliable and thus invalid.

You should read your sources more thoroughly.

Nothing about the way you formatted your post provided information that it contained anything but your opinions or someone else's opinion. I looked back at your post, and I can't tell what other paragraphs are copied. Put it in quotes, indent, italicize, and label it. That post was a bit incoherent because it changed perspectives unclearly.