Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This seems like an odd, and highly suspect criterion for establishing truth - determine the truthfulness of a claim by an accompanying confidence measure provided, naturally enough, by the person with the vested interest in having you believe the claim.
It still represents a trait, why do you guys constantly correct things that are not errors. Alleles are usually the two heterozygous pairs of genes, one dominant the other recessive which represent the vast majority divergent traits in living systems
Right -- Mendelian genetics, the genetics discovered by Mendel.
Mendelian genetics applies to a limited number of traits, only in the absence of linkage, epistasis, pleiotropy, and mutation. It's a useful approximation for some traits, the ones known as "Mendelian traits". It's completely wrong as a general description of genetics, which is your claim about it limiting species change is simply baffling to a geneticist. "What on earth are you talking about?" is the most appropriate response.
You made a claim. To wit:
Some scientists say (don’t ask me to quote anything, it’s there, look for yourself) that our family tree is more like a huge bush, with so many branches that lead to dead ends (not enough transition fossils found to seal the deal -- a brick wall) that it may be impossible to ever fill the gap and find a verifiable route from ape to the modern man.
This should be against the rules, along with goading. The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim.
Ok, my turn. There are 30-foot tall three-headed women living in the Amazon river valley. But don’t ask me to support my claim, you can google it yourself.
Some of us think our ideas are good enough to come out winners, even when we don't have the home team advantage.
Inquiring, you are quite right evolutionists are not facing up to what real proof they have that evolution has occurred on Earth.Some scientists say (don’t ask me to quote anything, it’s there, look for yourself
I have often times found myself thinking “man, there appears to be a lot of evidence there, presented by knowledgeable people”... but it never pans out.
How long will it take for academia's and evolutionists to admit that Creation is the likely option if no such route is found, 100 years, 200 years, 500 years, never?
You speak fast and overlook much.
You have in hand Naturalism and Scientism.
So I take it you can’t name a reputable scientist either who holds the position expressed in the OP?
Nice sermon. Given that the science is overwhelmingly against you on this, the type of moralizing pontification we see in your post is likely your only option.
Yes it was.
