• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolutionism is not science but fool hypothesis

orange

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2004
505
17
63
Armenia
✟737.00
Faith
Protestant
Be well in truth...........Be well with truth......

Evolutionism it is not science, fool hypothesis about this-
If we would accept that God not created the world, then how the world could begin to had been? So it is simply imagination.
You can also imagine so, if you were not born from your mother, then how you can be created in 10 billion years from the mud by Evolution?
Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000…………. and so on.
Certainly this argument also means nothing for Evolutionists as all other scientific facts.

How billion dollars was wasted to prove this fool “evolution”
From all nations. Devil simply steal from us these billions…..



MY (((((((((Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000…………. and so on. )))))))))

Yours (((((((((((((So are the odds of 50 people winning a lottery in a particular order. Does that mean that lotteries are impossible? This argument doesn't work orange...and it really is a PRATT.)))))))))

Thank you for these words from you. From 1 minus 0.00000000000000000...===1
It is probability that God had Created the world.
Buy your lottery with 0.000000000.....probability. but I would buy lottery with 1* probability..........Here what is mean to be fooled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Orange in Christ
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starcrystal
J

Jet Black

Guest
orange said:
Evolutionism is not science, it is hypothesis about this-

If we would accept that God not created the world, then how the world could begin to had been? So it is simply imagination.
where the world came from has nothing to do with evolution.
You can also imagine so, if you were not born from your mother, then how you can be created in 10 billion years from the mud by Evolution?
abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.
Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0,0000000000000000000000…………. and so on.
your calculations are both flawed, and irrelevant. abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.
Certainly this argument also means nothing for Evolutionists as all other scientific facts.
there is nothing to see here. move along, move along.
 
Upvote 0

Captain_Jack_Sparrow

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2004
956
33
60
From Parts Unknown
✟1,283.00
Faith
Anglican
Orange,

Coming from someone who is scientifically inept the above statement is meaningless.

You may not like it but evolution is science - just as mechanics, electromagnetism, redox reactions, plasma physics, meterology etc etc etc are.

I would almost guarantee that all evolutionary biologists are more capable academically and logical thinking than you are - so unless you are mandating that they are all involved in a conspiracy then your point is no point at all. The conspiracy is especially unlikely given the fact that these scientists are of all faiths from all types of backgrounds.

By the way - what scientific skills do you posess? What do you do for a living?
 
Upvote 0

AgentX

Member
Jan 26, 2004
13
0
44
Texas
✟15,123.00
Faith
Atheist
It's always a pleasure to read your posts, orange. I hope that English is not your first language. However, since I barely know a second language, my hat's off to you if you know a 2nd, it's hard to do.

Anyway, on to your post.
Evolutionism is not science, it is hypothesis about this-

How do you figure? What is not science? Evolution is a process that has many, many levels of scientific proof, including fossil records, DNA sampling, observed phenomena, etc. If solid, contradictory evidence was given against these things, then biologists and all scientists would have no choice but to abandon evolution as an explanation of the current biological diversity on planet earth. Unfortunately, scientific fact points to evolution instead of creation...

If we would accept that God not created the world, then how the world could begin to had been? So it is simply imagination.

I'm not sure what you are getting at, but I think you are asking how the world was created. I would contend that the universe was created as we know it in the big bang many billions of years ago. This explanation leaves out god, and is accepted by most scientists with an understanding of physics. Evidence, such as red-shift and cosmic rays, including gamma rays, supports this theory.

There is no need for god to have done anything in order for the world to exist as we know it. Occam's Razor basically states that you don't need to complicate things by adding unnecessary elements, and in this case, your idea of god is unnecessary. Once again, if scientific facts said otherwise, then we would have no choice but to reject the big bang in favor of another explanation.

You can also imagine so, if you were not born from your mother, then how you can be created in 10 billion years from the mud by Evolution?

I think you are refering to natural selection. It is the process by which some animals survive to reproduce and others do not. Hence, the ones who survive are more capable and thier traits get passed on. Wait a few million years, add natural mutation and natural genetic differences, and you have a new species. All it takes is time.

Abiogenesis, however, is the process by which life is created from non-life. Exact conditions for this process are difficult to create, but some speculate that thermal vents in the bottom of the ocean may have been the starting point for life.

Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0,0000000000000000000000…………. and so on.

Finding a probability of something like evolution is essentially meaningless. When assigning numbers to the process, it is very arbitrary. By manipulating a few numbers and I'm sure I can make it look like there is 100% chance of evolution.

Evolution is not something that requires belief in the way creation does. Evolution happens and has been observed. It is a scientific fact, and sooner or later everybody on the earth will realize that. Nobody believes the earth is flat anymore, which the church used to teach, even when evidence was brought forward to the contrary. Soon, maybe in a few more generations, people will begin to wake up and realize that young earth creation has just about as much merrit as indian myths or thor's thunderbolts or zeus's favor.
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
Phred said:
You creationists should gang up on Orange and burn him at the stake or something. He's making you all look bad. Well... worse.

Nah, if creationists started burning creationists that made creationists look bad, pretty soon there'd be no creationists left. And then we would be sad, because we'd have to find something else to argue.
 
Upvote 0

Phred

Junior Mint
Aug 12, 2003
5,373
998
✟22,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Jet Black said:
maybe we did, but we also corrected you. We are right on this, so I would very much appreciate it if you stop posting the same old errors, otherwise it makes you look like a liar.
If it quacks like a duck...
 
Upvote 0

Captain_Jack_Sparrow

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2004
956
33
60
From Parts Unknown
✟1,283.00
Faith
Anglican
orange said:
Your destruction is close..........


Is that a threat. If so it probably breaks a number of forum rules.

You still haven't answered my query as to your scientific qualifications and what you do for a living with that mighty intellect and capacity for logical thinking.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Pete Harcoff said:
When I read this, I read it as "Orange Christ" which made me think of "Orange Crush" which make me think there were religiously-themed soft drinks now (maybe a merchandising tie-in with Mel's new movie?).
Sure, haven't you tried the newest flavor?

THE PASSION(FRUIT) OF THE CHRIST
 
  • Like
Reactions: davyuk
Upvote 0