Great points Jack and I don't disagree. I have an advanced degree in a health science field, but I am no appointed expert on all the pieces of evolution. What I will do, is research Cubanito's points when I have the chance and respond to them.
You are correct, I have relied heavily on scientists who are most familiar (biologists, etc.) in regards to interpreting the evidence etc. With that being said, since you are in the same position of Cubanito and disagree with the theory of evolution, I am always curious as to why and would ask the same questions to you, since this theory has been around for over 100 years and no one yet has been able to present evidence to refute it, but according to the the vast majority of the biologists (I am sure you saw the quote from Francis Collins, the christian is was head of the human genome project) are saying the evidence keeps getting stronger.
With this being the case:
-Do you feel there is some world wide scientific conspiracy to support the theory of evolution? If so, what is the motivation to do so?
-Do you feel the scientific community is simply missing the evidence, that people like yourself and Cubanito see differently and just haven't yet put the pieces together as you have?
-Would you agree, that if evolution is not true, then it is possible to produce evidence to show the theory was indeed false? And if so, do you agree the scientist (or scientists) that produce the evidence to refute evolution would be world renowned for their discovery?
-Of the thousands of scientists world wide (many of whom are wildly independent and do not like to be told what to believe), why hasn't anyone been able to refute the theory with evidence, decade after decade after decade?
I appreciate your honest reposes, because I am truly interested in your answers.
Great points Jack and I don't disagree. I have an advanced degree in a health science field, but I am no appointed expert on all the pieces of evolution. What I will do, is research Cubanito's points when I have the chance and respond to them.
You are correct, I have relied heavily on scientists who are most familiar (biologists, etc.) in regards to interpreting the evidence etc. With that being said, since you are in the same position of Cubanito and disagree with the theory of evolution, I am always curious as to why and would ask the same questions to you, since this theory has been around for over 100 years and no one yet has been able to present evidence to refute it, but according to the the vast majority of the biologists (I am sure you saw the quote from Francis Collins, the christian is was head of the human genome project) are saying the evidence keeps getting stronger.
With this being the case:
-Do you feel there is some world wide scientific conspiracy to support the theory of evolution? If so, what is the motivation to do so?
-Do you feel the scientific community is simply missing the evidence, that people like yourself and Cubanito see differently and just haven't yet put the pieces together as you have?
-Would you agree, that if evolution is not true, then it is possible to produce evidence to show the theory was indeed false? And if so, do you agree the scientist (or scientists) that produce the evidence to refute evolution would be world renowned for their discovery?
-Of the thousands of scientists world wide (many of whom are wildly independent and do not like to be told what to believe), why hasn't anyone been able to refute the theory with evidence, decade after decade after decade?
I appreciate your honest reposes, because I am truly interested in your answers.
bhsmte,
I must be quite frank; I am by no means a scientist, I am a researcher. But I only research things that are of interest to me. I am a Christian. I accept God's word as truth. God's word is quite clear, God created the entire universe in six literal days. Following the genealogies listed in the Bible, we can come to an approximate age of 6,000 years for Planet Earth. Hence, evolution cannot be true.
I Googled science and this appeared:
sci·ence
ˈsīəns/
noun
1.
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
"the world of science and technology"
synonyms:
branch of knowledge, body of knowledge/information, area of study,discipline, field More
Notice the words, through observation and experiment. Evolution is full of theories that have never been confirmed through either observation, or experimentation. No scientist can say that any evolution has actually taken place that either he, or another scientist has not observed. Putting out a theory is just that, a theory. Nothing more, nothing less. 5000 men can get together and say, We believe this is what happened 100,000,000 or (fill in the number) years ago, but that is nothing more than a theory, and without observing that theory for whatever time period is suggested, there is no science involved, only theory!
Let me now address your questions briefly:
-Do you feel there is some world wide scientific conspiracy to support the theory of evolution? If so, what is the motivation to do so?
I believe there is an effort by those who hate God to admit that He created all things.
Romans 1
18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
-Do you feel the scientific community is simply missing the evidence, that people like yourself and Cubanito see differently and just haven't yet put the pieces together as you have?
See the above Bible text.
-Would you agree, that if evolution is not true, then it is possible to produce evidence to show the theory was indeed false? And if so, do you agree the scientist (or scientists) that produce the evidence to refute evolution would be world renowned for their discovery?
I believe we are going about this all wrong; it is you who must prove Creationism is wrong. Men have believed in creationism for hundreds, yea even thousands of years. Can you prove with evidence, not a theory, that God did not Create Heaven and Earth as the Bible teaches. Evolutionist like to put the burden of proof on Creationists, because they know they have no evidence to support their theories.
-Of the thousands of scientists world wide (many of whom are wildly independent and do not like to be told what to believe), why hasn't anyone been able to refute the theory with evidence, decade after decade after decade?
I'm certainly glad that even you in your own question to me, truthfully stated that what scientist have is a theory, and nothing more.
Jack