• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟43,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Please cite one instance of atrocities commited by American or Australian troops that was ordered by a General and supported by the proper authorities. Otherwise you are talking about teaching the exceptions, which is not teaching history, but pushing an agenda.

It is disengenious in the extreme to compare exceptions on one side to standard practice on the other.
The problem comes though is that it is a mindset. A way of thinking. For the japanese they have a huge emphasis on honour. For them to be caught alive was a fate worse than death. They just treated people according to their value system. It doesn't make it right of course. It is the same when we expect others to behave just like us though and then wonder why they get upset.

A question is not an answer. I'd like to see the citations keith has requested as well.

Will you provide them or not?
Vietnam is just one example of ordered attacks to kill babies and children. For me talking to WW2 vets who feels guilt and shame for treating POW that way is enough for me. They certainly wearn't talking about isolated incidents of one or two servicemen. At the end of the day I really don't care if you believe it or not.
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
The problem comes though is that it is a mindset. A way of thinking. For the japanese they have a huge emphasis on honour. For them to be caught alive was a fate worse than death. They just treated people according to their value system. It doesn't make it right of course. It is the same when we expect others to behave just like us though and then wonder why they get upset.


Vietnam is just one example of ordered attacks to kill babies and children. For me talking to WW2 vets who feels guilt and shame for treating POW that way is enough for me. They certainly wearn't talking about isolated incidents of one or two servicemen. At the end of the day I really don't care if you believe it or not.



Do you have a point in all of this? War is nasty and brutal and anyone who takes part is going to do awful things.

For some it was official govt policy at the highest level to deliberately commit atrocities that were not a military necessity but reflected their
perverted thinking. That describes German and Japanese thinking in WWII. It does not describe the Aus, US, British etc thinking.

If you think it does, well, go ahead but it only says something about you. I dont think the rest of us want to hear any more about it.
 
Upvote 0

atomweaver

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2006
1,706
181
"Flat Raccoon", Connecticut
✟25,391.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
The detainment of Japanese in WWII compares to an atrocity done by the Japanese in Philippines, China, Korea, Burma, Vietnam, Pacific Islands.....??? That is grotesque, thats ridiculous.

No, no. The Dag read me better. The response was to the assertion that US history only teaches some kind of "rosy" version of our involvements in war, where all our troops are the Good Guys, and all of our politicians are heroes. These weren't examples for comparison of the severity of one atrocity vs. another, they were examples to refute the position that only the "good" is taught in school about our own military and political actions...

And it wasnt paranoia, it was good sense.

In principal, perhaps. In execution, it was well below our standards of the time for the treatment of POWs. That is exactly why it was taught; as a cautionary tale. In this light, Guantanamo was a repetition of an earlier historical error, although one that affected fewer total people, but with more severe treatment...

WHAT do you suppose happened to any foreigners who happened to be in Japan at that time? VERY few made it home, after, of course, being forced to labor for the war effort.

Are you suggesting an eye for an eye, then? No, not with regards to the minimum standards of the treatment of people. I'd rather simply hold ourselves to a standard of treatment that we find to be acceptable... I don't get a vote in what the rest of the world chooses to do, but I do get one here in the US.

Obviously individual troops did and always will do awful things.

I dont believe that there was a Bataan Death March to the internment camps in the USA though.

What i grew up with, I have to force myself to be friendly to Japanese students. i know its wrong not to be, so I am, and I'm getting over it. Its not their fault. But the Japanese were really really bad and you wont find many Chinese who feel sorry they got nuked. Well, I do coz babies and women.. but oh well..

Not having your historical/cultural context within which you were raised, I won't pretend to understand what you feel. It sounds like you are coming to terms with it, though, and that is excellent. Remember, too, that while you are historically and culturally Chinese, you are now also an American. I'll only wish you good luck in choosing the best from both... :)
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
No, no. The Dag read me better. The response was to the assertion that US history only teaches some kind of "rosy" version of our involvements in war, where all our troops are the Good Guys, and all of our politicians are heroes. These weren't examples for comparison of the severity of one atrocity vs. another, they were examples to refute the position that only the "good" is taught in school about our own military and political actions...



In principal, perhaps. In execution, it was well below our standards of the time for the treatment of POWs. That is exactly why it was taught; as a cautionary tale. In this light, Guantanamo was a repetition of an earlier historical error, although one that affected fewer total people, but with more severe treatment...



Are you suggesting an eye for an eye, then? No, not with regards to the minimum standards of the treatment of people. I'd rather simply hold ourselves to a standard of treatment that we find to be acceptable... I don't get a vote in what the rest of the world chooses to do, but I do get one here in the US.



Not having your historical/cultural context within which you were raised, I won't pretend to understand what you feel. It sounds like you are coming to terms with it, though, and that is excellent. Remember, too, that while you are historically and culturally Chinese, you are now also an American. I'll only wish you good luck in choosing the best from both... :)


Hey I am very serious minded yeah yeah USA! So maybe I get touchy with any criticism. Funny huh? But you are right all the things you said.
 
Upvote 0