Distinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human genome
Distinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human genome
In this study they identified 1,177 orphan genes in humans but not found in primates. I retract my claim that they are functional. This is not known.
In this paper, their conclusions are pretty interesting though. It shows how the belief in Evolution is being imposed on the data. Because function in the orphans would portray Evolution in an unfavorable light, (too much new function after break with chimps) the authors conclude that they must not have function.
"
If the orphans represent valid human protein-coding genes, we would have to conclude that the vast majority of the orphans were born after the divergence from chimpanzee. Such a model would require a prodigious rate of gene birth in mammalian lineages and a ferocious rate of gene death erasing the huge number of genes born before the divergence from chimpanzee. We reject such a model as wholly implausible. We thus conclude that the vast majority of orphans are simply randomly occurring ORFs that do not represent protein-coding genes. "
Now if we do find unequivocal evidence for function in these orphans, just wait and see, it will be accommodated. "Well I guess evolution
can do that after all!" Actually this is similar to evolutionists rationalization many other Orphan genes that have been shown to be functional protein-coders. From an evolutionary standpoint, this was totally unexpected prior to the discovery.
What is unfortunate though is how Evolution religion actually stops science. Because the authors believe so strongly in Evolution, instead of leaving the question open, they end up discouraging any search for function in these genes. They *know* there must be no function in them because "evolution is a fact"... It's the same science-stopper behavior that we saw with "junk DNA" .
ok so these Junk dna and these orphan genes... do you have any guess what they are?
(besides "they shall becomes one flesh issues" with some of these orphaned placed genes maybe)
you see what science will never explain because they refuse to see it or ask or answer . is that all men and all woman are from what I can only call direct clans because that is how I learned it .
within these clans men throw true type in a given environment and with in a given population .. it so far the only thing that dna researchers can "SEE" is only the male clans . because it is only what they can find because it is the only thing looked for ...it is only the males that they can " see ".
race is only the father and the mothers father. thus one and 1/2 generatrion deep .
that is all they can see that is all they have wanted to see ! to compare one race with another just to finds the differences yes.. but that part is totally controlled by the direct male line linages.
so where is the mothers clan line? they have to be there someplace , because science does not see them at all .
because they breed true also ..
all woman from the same line can be found pretty easy by true observation... all their kids by the same males clans will look all alike with in each female line. but science can't find them by any kind of autosomal genetics with less than 4%...
because they only see the differences.. those variations which is totally controlled by the males. where mostly females control function and maybe size issues with in an environment. all science can see of the females is less than 4% of both of the fathers mother 's X's lineage the whole direct female lineage and 5% give or take of the direct female lineage.. all of it.. that is all they can see.
because males
races or types are imprinted onto the females direct lineages .. so what is that the race imprinted upon? because they are only seeing the race of the males. but the females lines breed true also and it is there someplace , and it is something they don't consider important that is for dang sure!
Race is only a generation and 1/2 deep. and they can't see history though they impose it into their theories onto all people in the most arrogant ways imaginable. the theories are all so very twisted up because of their ignorance as to how genetics is actually passed down from our ancestors and they do seem to be completely void of any true questions and real answers .
They have had to maintain a belief in
random and mystic genetics in order to maintain scientism theories of a mystical magic random beginning.. so they are unwilling to ask the questions which come from true knowledge and unbiased observation.
so they don't have a clue what they are talking about.
