Please tell me that you really do think the platypus has a bill like a duck, for that would be just the level of knowledge I would expect from a creationist.
Had it occurred to you that it may be the case that each and every phylogenetic tree ever presented was not actually constructed using data from every known living thing?
I am reminded of the laughable tale of Walter Brown, PhD (mechanical engineering), YEC, who once declared that his teenage son had disproved evolution for he referred to a paper that had a phylogenetic tree that placed rattlesnakes closer to humans than chimps.
Pity for Brown, for it took an honest, competent evolutionist 30 seconds to discover that the paper in question did not even use chimp data.
Still waiting for you to present the fossils of the breeding pair that produced the fist Asian person and the first African person such that the Asian and the African could hybridize to form an Afro-Asian, since according to you, that is how all variation arises.
It’s you that claims fossils show a phylogenic tree. It’s you that claims common ancestors split to become other species.
All I see now is you admitting no common ancestor can be found for any of these claimed splits.
Unlike you I am not claiming a fish split into both a anphibian and reptile. Nor that amphibians split to become mammals and birds.
You have Fossil evidence that humans have always been human. It’s only when we get to the point where supposedly humans and ape split, does the fossil record suddenly become non existent.
I’m not claiming Adam and Eve split to become different forms altogether. The fossil evidence supports me, not you, because as far back as you can trace man, they are always man. Race not observable in fossils.
Unless you wish to call both Denisovans and Neanderthal a separate race.
As a matter of fact new findings are challenging your claims of this phylogenic tree you rely on.
Discovery of Oldest DNA Scrambles Human Origins Picture
I simply claim humans have always been humans. If you want to call them Neanderthals, or H. Erectus, that’s fine.
But it’s your claim of a common ancestor that split, so we can’t find one example of this common ancestor. Not just for man, but for any species where this claimed split took place.
Instead you have fully formed human fossils and fully formed ape fossils. We won’t count the orangutans skulls and pigs teeth evolutionists have used in an attempt to provide “evidence”. We won’t talk about piltdown man, hesperopithecus or Nebraska man, Pithecanthropus or Java man and the Wadjak skulls debacle, sinanthropus or peeking man, homo habilis, ramapithecus, or Australopithecus.
No we won’t show you really have so little evidence they find it necessary to manufacture it. Or how they mistake pigs teeth as human teeth, or orangutans skulls as human skulls.
No, we won’t discuss your tendency to see exactly what you want to see.