Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evolution requires intelligent design.
The fine-tuning of the fundamental constants of nature allow for the existence of chemical biological life of the kind we have on earth. This means, if you can somehow construct these living systems, the laws of physics allows for it.
But I'm starting to hear from evolutionist physicists that the laws of physics do more; they are set up in such a way as to guarantee that life develops. They participate in the development of chemical biological life.
Why don't they just come right out and say it: evolution requires intelligent design.
Mainstream ToE depends on random chance, zillions upon zillions of them through processes of mutation and adaption.
Probability without cause is the kind stuff you read about in comic books. Take the big bang theory for example, the probability of it occurring is zero without a cause, the probability of the necessary circumstances required without causes are equally zero.
The slightest mutation or change, requires cause, and it cannot arrive through probability, only after the fact, after a cause, can the issue of probability even be considered.
Intelligent Design – Why Scientists are Abandoning Darwin (P4101B)
Scientists Confirm: Darwinism Is Broken
It is pretty much mainstream for anyone following this topic.
Adaptation is not evolution. Evolution claims that one species turns or "evolves" into another entirely different species
to which there is zero evidence.
Adaptation is observed but that is not the result of adding entirely new DNA or removing DNA, both to which is frankly impossible outside a lab.....which could lead one to Genesis 6....then to modern day transhumanism....I will leave it at that.
Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.
Where can I observe that?
Show me one species turning into another over time.
Honestly you are just parroting the same old proven false theory. Did you know most scientist are actually distancing themselves from Darwin altogether.
I considered this view but reject it because there is no mechanism in which God can interact with the incredibly complex chemical biological mechanisms to tweak it here and there as needed.
Citation?... I'm starting to hear from evolutionist physicists that the laws of physics do more; they are set up in such a way as to guarantee that life develops. They participate in the development of chemical biological life.
Intelligent design, the God of the Bible, the Bible itself do not rise and fall upon false and incorrect theories of the evolution that does not exist, nor do they rise and fall upon either man's logic or man's labels of what he thinks are logical fallacies. Man is accountable to, and will be judged by an Intelligence that designed the material universe, that is also the God of the Bible, and Who will use the Words of the Bible to bring that judgment upon every individual human that has ever lived. People can disbelieve and deny, but that will not save them from this coming judgment.attacks on evolution and the repetition of logical fallacies is not evidence for id.
Evolution requires intelligent design.
The fine-tuning of the fundamental constants of nature allow for the existence of chemical biological life of the kind we have on earth. This means, if you can somehow construct these living systems, the laws of physics allows for it.
But I'm starting to hear from evolutionist physicists that the laws of physics do more; they are set up in such a way as to guarantee that life develops. They participate in the development of chemical biological life.
Why don't they just come right out and say it: evolution requires intelligent design.
there is no evidence of any species spontaneously appearing.There is no evidence of one species turning into another spontaneously in the fossil record. If so please cite it.
you would tan while in Brazil thanks to millions of years of evolution and the adaption your ancestors went through to deal with higher exposure to UV light.Adaptation is just that, the finch in Darwins theory is adaptation of the beak getting smaller. The DNA of the finch did not change but the size of it adapted because it stopped growing so it could feed...If I move to Brazil, I would become very tan, more than I am now, I would probably appear more tan constantly, this is not me evolving, this is my skin adapting to the environment.
Yeah I've read about these. The image of "scientists" tossing plastic children's toys into a wash tub was good for a laugh. As i recall the explanation was that dinosaurs were so much more streamlined so they sank to deeper layers....Furthermore there has been studies showing if you dump large and small animals in with dirt and water in a huge tank, stir them up and put water over them at a rapid rate they always layer in the same pattern....kind of like the flood.
you might try the mendelian institutes ongoing experiment.Where can I observe that? Show me one species turning into another over time. Honestly you are just parroting the same old proven false theory. Did you know most scientist are actually distancing themselves from Darwin altogether.
and you just claimed that the theory of evolution has been proven false. Evidence please.That is not how that works, you are the one claiming evolution exists, now prove it. Provide scientific observable evidence of one species turning into another different species with new DNA added. Please provide it.
Oh, and you can keep your pseudo intellectual insults to yourself.
Intelligent design, the God of the Bible, the Bible itself do not rise and fall upon false and incorrect theories of the evolution that does not exist, nor do they rise and fall upon either man's logic or man's labels of what he thinks are logical fallacies. Man is accountable to, and will be judged by an Intelligence that designed the material universe, that is also the God of the Bible, and Who will use the Words of the Bible to bring that judgment upon every individual human that has ever lived. People can disbelieve and deny, but that will not save them from this coming judgment.
The material universe abounds with evidence of I.D.
On the contrary, what is evidence to one person, may not be conclusive evidence to another. What is declaration to one, may be ranting to another. You can choose to believe whatever you want. Speaking strictly for myself, every living cell of ever living organism is filled with evidence of ID. This is not an attack on evolution, this is evidence of ID, which could have no chance of coming into existence at all by non-intelligent chance. To the contrary, I know no such thing that what I write is garbage, but if you think it is.... to each his own.you stated:
Well it doesn't. When evidence for ID is requested the response is never evidence but often repeated logical fallacies and attacks (usually baseless) on evolution.
Your rant here tells me that you know this and that you know your claim about the abundance of evidence of ID is garbage.
No: EvolutionEvolution requires intelligent design.
It usually takes million of years for most species to evolve into another species so you cannot observe that! If you were to sit down just watch a species with short generations such as bacteria for many years you may be lucky and see a new species eventually emerge. But this has been done for you:Where can I observe that? Show me one species turning into another over time. Honestly you are just parroting the same old proven false theory. Did you know most scientist are actually distancing themselves from Darwin altogether.
Evolution of aerobic citrate usage in one population
The inability to grow aerobically on citrate, referred to as a Cit− phenotype, is considered a defining characteristic of E. coli as a species...
and i believe in empirical evidence, evidence that shows evolution is real, it does exist and it is true.On the contrary, what is evidence to one person, may not be conclusive evidence to another. What is declaration to one, may be ranting to another. You can choose to believe whatever you want.
Fine. Have a nice life.and i believe in empirical evidence, evidence that shows evolution is real, it does exist and it is true.
I make these observations purely to help you and others of like mindset have a clearer picture as to where many evolutionists are coming from. I'm not trying to persuade you - I know a lost cause when I see one.Speaking strictly for myself, every living cell of ever living organism is filled with evidence of ID. This is not an attack on evolution, this is evidence of ID, which could have no chance of coming into existence at all by non-intelligent chance. To the contrary, I know no such thing that what I write is garbage, but if you think it is.... to each his own.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?