Evolution or Creationism?

[Loudmouth]

From the evolutionist Bible I see. All this shows as my video pointed out was human and apes had variety of different skulls. We even have a case of human with very small skull size buried along with modern day humans.

We have facts, not a Bible. I show you how hominids have changed through time, and you just ignore it. Go figure.

 

[Smidlee]

We have facts, not a Bible. I show you how hominids have changed through time, and you just ignore it. Go figure.

You haven't show me nothing. All you show me in different skulls with most of them was glue together based on evolutionist assumptions.

 

[Loudmouth]

You haven't show me nothing. All you show me in different skulls with most of them was glue together based on evolutionist assumptions.

No assumptions were made in reconstructing those fossils, other than the assumption of bilateralism.

How did you determine that there is stasis in the fossil record? What would disprove stasis in the fossil record?

 

[Smidlee]

No assumptions were made in reconstructing those fossils, other than the assumption of bilateralism.

How did you determine that there is stasis in the fossil record? What would disprove stasis in the fossil record?

I know this is false. Here is an example of evolutionist assumption were wrong.
http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v18i2f.htm#footnote6

Previous artists’ conceptions based on reconstructions from broken, partial skulls have tended to give the alleged human ancestors weak, ape-like chins. Skull 5 looks more like Jay Leno. (That joke won’t mean much 14 years from now.)

 

[Loudmouth]

I know this is false. Here is an example of evolutionist assumption were wrong.
http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v18i2f.htm#footnote6

Could you be more specific?

 

[Astrophile]

That's what I've been saying. This is why it's forbidden in scripture. It's one of the ten commandments. Today Man tries to explain away his origins with a theory created by the image of his mind.

Because God is wired into man doesn't mean he going to worship his true Creator but instead believe everything under the sun but the true God.

So how do you know which is the 'true God' or the 'true Creator' and which are the gods that we have created in our own image? (I know; the true God is the one that you were brought up to worship as a child.)

 

[Split Rock]

Something like stasis in the fossil record.

That is very strange, considering the fact that Stabilizing Selection is a long supported part of the Theory of evolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilizing_selection

 

[Givemeareason]

That is very strange, considering the fact that Stabilizing Selection is a long supported part of the Theory of evolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilizing_selection

I think it was rather presumptuous for someone who was clearly not interested in learning anything to fail to have a response when confronted with facts. It sure is beautiful up here in North Dakota. Don't you agree.

 

[Split Rock]

I think it was rather presumptuous for someone who was clearly not interested in learning anything to fail to have a response when confronted with facts. It sure is beautiful up here in North Dakota. Don't you agree.

I think of North Dakota as Topologically Challenged, LOL!

 

[Givemeareason]

I think of North Dakota as Topologically Challenged, LOL!

Then it must be a matter of different viewpoints.[emoji6]

 

[Smidlee]

That is very strange, considering the fact that Stabilizing Selection is a long supported part of the Theory of evolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilizing_selection

I don't find that surprising since everything under the sun support evolution which mean it explains absolutely nothing. Of course evolutionist has to explain away why the fossil record doesn't support the theory.

Gould claim up with "punctuated equilibrium" try to come up for an excuse why the fossil record didn't Darwin's theory.

 

[HitchSlap]

I know this is false. Here is an example of evolutionist assumption were wrong.
http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v18i2f.htm#footnote6

Why would you quote a software designer as an expert in the field?

From your linky:

"Do-While Jones writes and speaks about software development in general, and about the Ada programming language in particular."

 

[Smidlee]

Why would you quote a software designer as an expert in the field?

From your linky:

"Do-While Jones writes and speaks about software development in general, and about the Ada programming language in particular."

The exact same reason people post from Talkorigins and act as if it's the gospel.

 

[Loudmouth]

I don't find that surprising since everything under the sun support evolution which mean it explains absolutely nothing.

Evolution could not explain numerous and obvious violations of the nested hierarchy among complex eukaryotes. It couldn't explain a rabbit in Cambrian strata.

It is creationism that is incapable of producing a falsifiable theory or predictions.

Of course evolutionist has to explain away why the fossil record doesn't support the theory.

Name one fossil that doesn't support evolution.

Gould claim up with "punctuated equilibrium" try to come up for an excuse why the fossil record didn't Darwin's theory.

Punctuated equilibria is evolution.

 

[Loudmouth]

The exact same reason people post from Talkorigins and act as if it's the gospel.

And once again we see a Christian who tries to discredit a scientific theory by comparing it to their religious beliefs. What does that tell you about their religious beliefs?

When was the last time you saw a scientist trying to discredit creationism by calling it "just another science"? What you are admitting is that science is far superior to your religious beliefs.

 

[Smidlee]

Evolution could not explain numerous and obvious violations of the nested hierarchy among complex eukaryotes. It couldn't explain a rabbit in Cambrian strata.

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/06/do_all_life_for096771.html
I think he done a good job pointed out a lot of violations of the nested hierarchy.
Darwin tree of life only exist in evolutionist mind.

Punctuated equilibria is evolution.

Of course. PE is just evolutionist trying to claim evidence that support creation and hoping no one notices.

 

[Loudmouth]

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/06/do_all_life_for096771.html
I think he done a good job pointed out a lot of violations of the nested hierarchy.

You think? Why don't you pick one and let's see if it stands up to scrutiny.

Of course. PE is just evolutionist trying to claim evidence that support creation.

How does speciation and common ancestry support creation?

 

[Smidlee]

You think? Why don't you pick one and let's see if it stands up to scrutiny.

I've already show a video that compared the evidence vs evolutionist assumption. The dotted line are based on evolutionist belief in their tree.

How does speciation and common ancestry support creation?

Why would common ancestry not support creation?

 

[Loudmouth]

I've already show a video that compared the evidence vs evolutionist assumption. The dotted line are based on evolutionist belief in their tree.

I have already addressed your claims. Those lines represent shared characteristics and shared DNA, WHICH STILL EXIST.

Why would common ancestry not support creation?

Are you saying that creationism is fine with humans and other mammals sharing a common ancestor?

 

[Smidlee]

I have already addressed your claims. Those lines represent shared characteristics and shared DNA, WHICH STILL EXIST.

No you haven't. Dolphins and bats shared genes that not doesn't fit the evolution myth.(not the result of common ancestry)

Are you saying that creationism is fine with humans and other mammals sharing a common ancestor?

You are referring to the Frankencell myth. Creationist believe in common ancestor as shown in my video ,stasis, vertical lines and not the imaginary lines evolutionist add in to make a tree.

Man was created directly by God who is ,as my TED video mention, a million times smarter than man.