Evolution is not science

[sfs]

You need to look me in the eye when you post. I've been one of you and know who you are. This you dislike, just a little bit. You love offence and hate defense.

I dislike posts heavy on bombast and short on data. It's up to you whether I dislike your posts or not.

 

[Nithavela]

You really have to pity a classroom prodigy of geology who seems to be so prodigious in his field of expertise that he cannot even try to understand anything outside of it.

 

[Heissonear]

This is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to project your own personal failings on to scientists.

.

Humm, you are offended by those who expose the error of Scientism?

.

 

[Heissonear]

No, I don't.

No, you don't. You here hypotheses based on observations and known physical processes.

A little bit of denial and disinformation?

 

[Heissonear]

You really have to pity a classroom prodigy of geology who seems to be so prodigious in his field of expertise that he cannot even try to understand anything outside of it.

I've walked in your Naturalism shoes. I've been academically graded on how well I learned it. I've rubbed shoulders with a many of you. Does this prior experience I have bother you? You think I don't understand what you present ?

Now, show me a stratagraphic sequence that proves Ancestral to Descendent fossil record. The stage is yours.

.

 

[Heissonear]

I dislike posts heavy on bombast and short on data. It's up to you whether I dislike your posts or not.

Why are most of you followers of Scientism on this forum? Care to reveal? Talking down is clearly evident, my friend.

 

[sfs]

Why are most of you followers of Scientism on this forum? Care to reveal?

I'm a Christian who's a physical and life scientist, posting in a Christian forum on physical and life sciences. Where else should I be?

Talking down is clearly evident, my friend.

Were you under the impression that you're not "talking down"? Regardless, I meant what I said: I am impressed by posts with data. Do you have any? Do you know any aspect of the physical and life sciences where you have a more accurate model than the conventional scientific one?

 

[BelievingIsObeying]

Evolution can not be proven because nobody has ever seen it happening!

I'm sure this sentence has been uttered an almost infinite number of times throughout history in one language or another with a different word at the beginning. It's funny to me how people can think anything impossible after everything that we have done.

 

[USincognito]

God is also used by many scientists in their job. They pray to God for guidance in their job. Therefore, God is science, by definition.

Ummm, therefore God is football... therefore God is car sales... therefore God is a B-52 bomb run.

 

[USincognito]

I'm a classroom prodigy...

You didn't happen to graduate from New Caney HS, did you?

 

[Heissonear]

Heiss,

You really need to humble yourself a bit.

Once again dodge the the issue presented.

The "you do not understand" is pushed by Naturalists here, no? Christians don't understand science, scientific method, evolution, walk by evidence, think rationally, remove superstition, etc.

.

 

[Doveaman]

Ummm, therefore God is football... therefore God is car sales... therefore God is a B-52 bomb run.

According to Split Rock, yes.

Evolution is what scientists use in their job. Therefore, it is science, by definition.

Shoes is what scientists use in their job. Therefore, shoes is science, by definition.

 

[Split Rock]

According to Split Rock, yes.
Shoes is what scientists use in their job. Therefore, shoes is science, by definition.

You very fuuuuuuny! LOL

 

[Loudmouth]

Why are most of you followers of Scientism on this forum? Care to reveal? Talking down is clearly evident, my friend.

Why do you feel the need to call it scientism?

 

[Loudmouth]

Once again dodge the the issue presented.

The "you do not understand" is pushed by Naturalists here, no? Christians don't understand science, scientific method, evolution, walk by evidence, think rationally, remove superstition, etc.

.

If you want to claim that the theory of evolution is not science then you either misunderstand science or misunderstand the theory of evolution. Take your pick.

 

[Loudmouth]

A little bit of denial and disinformation?

Nope.

I am not the one trying to make science look like a religion for the express purpose of covering my own failings. That would be you.

 

[Loudmouth]

.

Humm, you are offended by those who expose the error of Scientism?

.

There is no scientism.

 

[Split Rock]

There is no scientism.

Hint: Heissonear lives under a bridge and collects tolls from travelers...

 

[hgkeller771]

Those scientists, PHD'S, Nobel prize winners and nominees, vehemently working in the 50's, 60's, and 70's to prove that evolution proved the lack of necessity of a creator have mostly now changed their minds and taken to believing in God a creator. New discoveries in cell structure and DNA have led them to believe that life on earth was a designed mechanism by a designer. Read David's Gift by H G Keller and The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel.

 

[hgkeller771]

That designed mechanism was evolution and natural selection. God created the living cell which includes the incredible DNA molecule. God also created the earth and the environment which picks and chooses viable living organisms. Time is the mystery. Understanding how time works is the key to understanding how evolution guided by God and managed by God's creation of the environment have produced a populated world.