Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Originally posted by Badfish
And real quick, I haven't seen the dragon history books, and I can tell you that Christianity is the overwhelming religion of choice, and there is a reason for that.
...For example, Numb. chap. xii. v. 3. "Now the man Moses was very meek above all the men which were on the face of the earth." If Moses said this of himself, instead of being the meekest of men, he was one of the most vain and arrogant of coxcombs; and the advocates for these books may now take which side they please, for both sides are against them. If Moses was not the author, the books are without authority; and if he was the author, the books are without credit; because, to boast of meekness is the reverse of meekness, and is a lie in sentiment.
(Author's emphasis, not mine.)
Originally posted by Badfish
I just did, all possibilities fit one of these catagories
keep in mind that #2 still gives an out for evolutionists, as it is a theoretical posibility that the Universe created itself, whether by matter/ anti matter collision, or drwn from another Universe, or any combo.
My assertion is that the Universe was created by some intelligent being, it is mathematically more probable, and mathematicians always trust the math.
I gotta go to bed, thanks for the chat Rufus and Hazy, have great night! Thanks for the links and thoughts, I do listen and am a free thinker, so don't label me a closeminded Christian.
See ya's tommorrow,
I wont, GTX.
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Am I the only one who noticed that JC stopped posting right after we asked him to test his creation hypothesis?
Originally posted by LewisWildermuth
Badfish, I am not refuting God but bad science used to promote God.
Bad science is a lie, and a lie should never be used to help bolster God, for it will be shown to be a lie and make those who put it forth look bad and thus God look bad.
Originally posted by Badfish
Very witty, why the useless reference to GTX?. . . . Is that the best you can do Rufus?
Originally posted by Badfish
He only has 6 posts or so, how can you stereotype him
Originally posted by Badfish
There is no science to promote God. I just said it can be deduced to creation by math.
Originally posted by armageddonman
Then would you please show us the math?
Originally posted by Badfish
Oh yes Infidels, ok, but you still had to know about the GTX fiasco last night or you wouldn't have blown my cover at Infidels. And how did you know it was me at Infidels?
Originally posted by Badfish
You can do it yourself, make a list of all known possibilities of the creation or appearance of the Universe, carefully put them all in one of the 3 catagories.
Originally posted by Badfish
You can do it yourself
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?