Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That reminds me of a thread I once started where I asked which would be harder:
A scientist sitting in a church, or a Christian working in a laboratory?
Something like that.
Yes.What if we went with a pentagonal-shaped block with the Ten Commandments written in all of those languages, as well as English. Would you be against it then?
How about an English version other than Elizabethan language?Yes and yes even.
We plebians get your science in Greek and Latin.
That's enough tongues to confuse us.
Yes, I do.You do know that scientists can also be Christians, right?
I'm of the persuasion that science is mostly witchcraft today.
Yes.
It's interesting that you make this point.
I'm of the persuasion that science is mostly witchcraft today.
So I guess I would just consider such a display to be a mockery.
You mean Jacobean?How about an English version other than Elizabethan language?
Yes, I do.
That's why I'm asking which is harder.
You mean Jacobean?
For the record, I would consider an anglicized version as mockery.
I've made this point many times here, and it's worth making again:
When I buy a Bible, the first thing I do is open it to Numbers 11:4 and see how "mixt" is spelled.
If it's spelled "mixed," the piece of trash goes back on the shelf.
Too bad.You believe in witches? I don't.
Too bad.
That's your blindspot -- not mine.
Albeit, witches today aren't anything like the true witches in the Old Testament.
Ya ... when I order a cheeseburger and Freedom Fries at McDonald's, I tell them to leave the witches' onions off.I have a good feeling that anything you label as witchcraft is really anything you don't like.
For the record, I would consider an anglicized version as mockery.
I've made this point many times here, and it's worth making again:
When I buy a Bible, the first thing I do is open it to Numbers 11:4 and see how "mixt" is spelled.
If it's spelled "mixed," the piece of trash goes back on the shelf.
Ya ... when I order a cheeseburger and Freedom Fries at McDonald's, I tell them to leave the witches' onions off.
Because I really don't care for diced onions.
Of course. See www.biologos.org for an example of those who embrace theistic macro evolution.
ecco said:It really does have everything to do with evolution. People, like yourself, who are creationists disbelieve evolution because you take a literal reading of Genesis. Some people who take a literal reading of Genesis also still believe in Geocentricity. I was just wondering how literally you read Genesis.
You still haven't answered. Is this another view you are embarrassed by?
Nothing to answer. The question concerning geocentricity isn't about evolution (whatever form of evolution you personally embrace).
No, I don't think you answered my question.So @AV1611VET, are you actually going to acknowledge that I did answer your question. Because here's the answer again:
If the British government did decide to post the Ten Commandments in Parliament (that is the correct way of spelling it), I would view as an unnecessary move.
No, I don't think you answered my question.
Your vague answer leaves me just as in the dark.
What do you mean by 'an unnecessary move'?
As I said, people misusing religion is the problem in the world, not religion itself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?