Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You've already stated that you don't have the data to formulate an equation to determine the odds therefore it is impossible for you to know the odds are against it.No hard evidence, just the odds against it happening.
In other words "I can't support my claim with any facts so I'm going to dishonestly shift the burden of proof onto Queller".Read up on it. Lot's of info out there.
You said:Just look at you own hand (it's right there, on the end of your arm).
What have you actually read about it? Give us some books or scientific articles you've read.
Just look at your own hand (it's right there, on the end of your arm).
NAme th earticle or book you readI just finished reading about the genome.
Who cares about what you can fathom?I can't fathom how long that took to evolve (there was nothing in the article about that either).
Prove it.It would take quantum leaps of evolution to accomplish all that.
God doesn't operate in quantum leaps either. He's already home.I just don't think there's enough time even given millions of years, and, evolution doesn't operate in quantum leaps, like God does.
You said:
"there are diagrams available to support my contention."
My hand is not a diagram. Show us a diagram that supports your conclusion.
So basically you just lied when you said:Design is in the eye of the beholder. There is no scientific definition. I could show you 'God's blueprint' and you still wouldn't see design. So there really is no point.
I just finished reading about the genome. I can't fathom how long that took to evolve (there was nothing in the article about that either). It would take quantum leaps of evolution to accomplish all that. I just don't think there's enough time even given millions of years, and, evolution doesn't operate in quantum leaps, like God does.
In other words you have no evidence. This is why I keep offering to discuss the concept of evidence with you and other creationists.Design is in the eye of the beholder. There is no scientific definition. I could show you 'God's blueprint' and you still wouldn't see design. So there really is no point.
I just finished reading about the genome. I can't fathom how long that took to evolve (there was nothing in the article about that either). It would take quantum leaps of evolution to accomplish all that. I just don't think there's enough time even given millions of years, and, evolution doesn't operate in quantum leaps, like God does.
You need to understand that you're trying to make an emotional argument here (e.g. an argument based on awe and wonder). And it's never going to work.
It's like me telling you that La La Land is the greatest film of all time simply because I had a positive emotional reaction when I watched it. If you don't share the same reaction, you won't agree that it's the greatest film of all time.
You need to come up with a different argument.
In other words you have no evidence. This is why I keep offering to discuss the concept of evidence with you and other creationists.
There is no evidence of evolution, as I understand it.
Carl Sagan and others already alluded to great odds against it.
I can't fathom how long that took to evolve (there was nothing in the article about that either).
....
Your understanding is sorely lacking.
Evolution is observed even.
Again, put up up shut up.
There is no evidence of evolution, as I understand it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?