Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Nope, that is your "Custom title. I just looked it up. The signature is at the bottom of your or my post. You would need to go to your own member page to see this.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope, that is your "Custom title. I just looked it up. The signature is at the bottom of your or my post. You would need to go to your own member page to see this.Actually mine is now "A person of low ability".
Interesting. I didn't get all that from your signature however.
Even more strange that when I quoted his signature to him that he did not recognize it. Since one chooses one's own signature not remembering it is not a good sign.I'm betting OWG has his display of signatures turned-off and forgot that there was such a thing. I have mine turned off. So when anybody refers to a sig, I have to click on their name and then on the Information tab. On a mobile device, there's even a bit more drilling.
But, it is strange that anyone who's been a member for 13 years doesn't seem to know what a signature even is.
Nope, that is your "Custom title. I just looked it up. The signature is at the bottom of your or my post. You would need to go to your own member page to see this.
You are welcome, and I see that you changed your sig.I just looked up my signature. It is (was) the same as my custom title, and I don't recall posting it. I have only visited my personal page a few times over the years. I just don't pay that much attention to it. Anyway thanks for bringing it to my attention.
You don't appear to have any experience related to science and science education. Therefore your "intuition" is based on nothing.My intuition is the result of experience. Without this "fools rush in".
You don't appear to have any experience related to science and science education. Therefore your "intuition" is based on nothing.
No, I mean exactly what I stated. You claim your intuition is based on experience but you have already acknowledged that you don't understand anything about the actual science behind evolution. Therefore your intuition is based on nothing.If you mean I haven't drunk the ToE cool-aid, you are correct.
Why do I get the feeling that if you were in charge one of the first things to go would be the First Amendment?I only have authority over myself, but if I was in charge things would be very different.
Just because you look at it doesn't mean you understand it. You've already admitted as much.[/QUOTE
Given your admitted lack of understanding of evolutionary theory, can you give us an example of something that is absurd about the TOE and why?No need for me to make such claims. Evolution teaching is already full of them. You have no idea how absurd the ToE is.
Except that you can give no example of something "nonsensical" about TOE. If you could, you would have by now.The 'understanding' of evolutionary science is just a big rabbit hole to me. It's difficult enough understanding how living things work without adding nonsensical theories to it.
Why do I get the feeling that if you were in charge one of the first things to go would be the First Amendment?
Except that you can give no example of something "nonsensical" about TOE. If you could, you would have by now.
And yet you still judge them wrong even though you don't know them...It's a moot point. I read the first few pages. If it doesn't grab me I don't continue reading...so of course I never know what happens. Lot's of things I will never know regardless of how interesting they might be.
Whose truth about human nature would you teach without running afoul of the Constitution?If I were in charge I would charge the education system to teach the truth, not about evolution, but about human nature. Of course it would be difficult finding teachers, so I would probably have to do it myself.
Cheap cop out.
Whose truth about human nature would you teach without running afoul of the Constitution?
You logical fallacy is: Argument from IncredulityThat's what I come away with when I peruse Gray's Anatomy. I just read about the function of the larynx. In my wildest dream I can't imagine it all coming together over millions of years via 'natural selection'. Same with every other system. It just doesn't compute.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?