Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As you should by now be well aware, the specific origin of life is irrelevant to the ToE, which is an explanation for the observed diversity of life, not its origins. That's why one of the assumptions is entities that can satisfy the requirements I gave earlier.
Living things exist and have existed for a very long time. That's all that's necessary.They don't know how life began but are certain that all the ingredients needed for evolution were packaged and ready when the event occurred.
Sorry, but this is not an adequate citation. It doesn't even quote Sagan. It's one person claiming that Sagan said that.
I suspect you are misremembering.I personally heard Sagan say words to that effect.
Sorry, you don't count as a citation, either.
Yeah, I covered this back in post 718, to which, curiously, OWG never responded.Sorry, but this is not an adequate citation. It doesn't even quote Sagan. It's one person claiming that Sagan said that.
Here is one piece of it.
Nope, I didn't miss them.1.
Lets consider the die that rolls or the coin that is flipped. The outcome may be unpredictable but the process involves a hand or human that is a catalyst for the event?
2.
Rain drops may be unpredictable to where they may land but the process which is the series of events that lead to rain are integral and there is a pattern?
Pressing me for answers on subjects other than the one we're supposed to be discussing -- evolution -- gives the impression that you don't respect me or my time.Please do not ignore these as it gives the impression that you may not respect me or the questions asked. I feel they are important or i wouldnt have asked.
I think neither one has anything to do with evolution.What u think?
That doesn't mean you're right. Your gut isn't objective. In fact, your "gut" isn't telling you anything at all. It's your brain.It's my gut feeling that I'm right (I have healthy guts).
Mostly that the laws of nature and physics that operate now operated the same way in the past. And since there is no evidence (and there would be) that they operated differently in the past...What are the assumptions in evolution?
Nope, I didn't miss them.
Pressing me for answers on subjects other than the one we're supposed to be discussing -- evolution -- gives the impression that you don't respect me or my time.
think neither one has anything to do with evolution.
I thought I answered all your questions already. Why don't you ask it again?Hey hey sfs
I respect and love you
Well saint i do not see anything you have done to address them. Why is that?
Well dont be shy. Why do you think neither one has anything to do with evolution.
Hey hey @Speedwell. Waiting on your reply so you, sfs and i can continue. Sfs has replied with a link to mutations.
I thought I answered all your questions already. Why don't you ask it again?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?