DogmaHunter
Code Monkey
- Jan 26, 2014
- 16,757
- 8,531
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Your emotional and psychological objections to reality are irrelevant.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evolution is disquieting and creepy.
Creation is sensible and comforting.
God's Creation lead to God's Great Flood.Evolution is disquieting and creepy.
Creation is sensible and comforting.
And the manufacture of matches leads to arson, doesn't it?God's Creation lead to God's Great Flood.
Noah preached righteousness to them beforehand; which leads me to wonder how many of them died and well to Hell.ecco said:God's Great Flood brutally killed all but a few people,
Parents and children meeting on the "other side."ecco said:including young children ...
Embryos aren't "children in the womb"?ecco said:... and even embryos.
I would imagine they were afraid of dying.ecco said:That probably wasn't very comforting to the mothers who saw their daughters buried alive in a mud slide.
It's the only theory in town because it has showed that all other ideas are hooey. For the third time, what idea do you have that you believe shows evolution to be an inadequate explanation? There's no point in having this discussion if you can't offer any superior alternative.It only looks top-notch because it is the only theory in town.
Interpretations of the bible could likewise fall into such a system of degrees of wrong. The trouble is it's harder to figure out which is more wrong without putting the bible to the standards of science. I'm fine doing that, but you still have some resistance.When scientists think the Bible says the earth is flat, they are just as wrong as those who thought the earth was flat.
In fact, they're wronger ... since they:
- Aren't using Boolean standards.
- Ignoring general relativity.
There is evidence that systems are designed and
only allow for a limited amount of variation.
It's also a game of connect-the-dots [witchcraft edition].
When it comes to those dots that are considered "human" or "humanoid," I believe I've explained them according to Biblical doctrine, backed up with Scripture.Whereas creationism is a game of ignore-the-dots.
Your emotional and psychological objections to reality are irrelevant.
There's more to reality than the ToE.
Obviously.
Which is completely irrelevant to the point I raised in response to your statement.
I can only repeat myself:
Your emotional and psychological objections to reality are irrelevant.
I don't object to the reality of the theory of evolution, I just think it's a disturbing concept. I have no objection if others believe it.
And again, I can only say that your psychological / emotional objections to the theory of evolution (lol @ the juvenile emphasis of the word "theory" btw) are irrelevant to its explanatory power and validity.
I think humanity needs to progress beyond the bounds of 'survival of the fittest'. There's too much of that going around.
Humanity progressed beyond 'survival of the fittest' long long ago. Life is much more than the Darwinist worldview of 'survival of the fittest'.
When it comes to those dots that are considered "human" or "humanoid," I believe I've explained them according to Biblical doctrine, backed up with Scripture.
If you want to call that "ignoring the dots," that's your prerogative.
Just don't expect me to agree with that.
There's more to reality than the ToE.
Magic is not an explanation.
I think humanity needs to progress beyond the bounds of 'survival of the fittest'. There's too much of that going around.
Great question. I'd like an answer for that one.How do you account for humans existing on the earth today?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?