Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, the human story tellers used that expression in one of the creation stories used by the Hebrew priest when they were writing and rewriting their exaggerated history.As I said, there were no genetic deficiences when Genesis 1 comes to a close.
God pronounced everything that existed, including the gene pool, 'very good.'
To answer your question: yes.
To ask a question: what is the picture supposed to prove?
Again ... what Hebrew priest?No, the human story tellers used that expression in one of the creation stories used by the Hebrew priest when they were writing and rewriting their exaggerated history.
The picture is just a modern day picture of where the flood took place. In the Tigris Euphrates River Valley in around the year 2300 BC.To answer your question: yes.
To ask a question: what is the picture supposed to prove?
I am just trying to find out what your looking for. There was a flood and everything was destroyed. How do you expect to find something when it is gone and God destroyed it? He has left us a lot of records of a lot of different things. In this case we have flood deposits exactly where we would expect to find them. In the area I live we have flood deposits from when the glaciers melted around 12,000 years ago. If you want to study the world before the glaciers then you have to go below those deposits.I didn't make a claim, you did. Why the need to shift the burden?
I am not shifting anything. You wanted to see the evidence of the flood, so I showed you the flood deposit. Floods always leave a deposit behind. You have to dig down to find it. In this case Whooly was doing archaeology in the city of Ur and found a layer that he attributed to Noahs flood. That is what you call scientific evidence. Usually archaeology looks for artifacts where they have monetary value. They do not spend a lot of time working on flood deposits where everything has been destroyed. They work on the layers were something remains that God has not destroyed. If He had destroyed with fire there would have been only a very think layer of ash. Not a thick layer like a flood leaves behind.I didn't make a claim, you did. Why the need to shift the burden?
The flood was a devise used by the Hebrew redactors when they were trying to trace their bloodlines back to Adam. Unable to do so they decided to drown the whole world in its wickedness. They didn't claim to be writing Gods word. They were appealing to a dejected, scattered audience. It worked.
I am not shifting anything. You wanted to see the evidence of the flood, so I showed you the flood deposit. Floods always leave a deposit behind. You have to dig down to find it. In this case Whooly was doing archaeology in the city of Ur and found a layer that he attributed to Noahs flood. That is what you call scientific evidence. Usually archaeology looks for artifacts where they have monetary value. They do not spend a lot of time working on flood deposits where everything has been destroyed. They work on the layers were something remains that God has not destroyed. If He had destroyed with fire there would have been only a very think layer of ash. Not a thick layer like a flood leaves behind.
I am just trying to find out what your looking for. There was a flood and everything was destroyed. How do you expect to find something when it is gone and God destroyed it? He has left us a lot of records of a lot of different things. In this case we have flood deposits exactly where we would expect to find them. In the area I live we have flood deposits from when the glaciers melted around 12,000 years ago. If you want to study the world before the glaciers then you have to go below those deposits.
Anyone you know of that is related to the Romans?No, the flood narrative IS in the genealogy of the Jews. Yet, no other culture or race on earth remembers being related to the Jews.
Gone with the wind.Where are the human skeletons from the flood?
Does a geologist agree that a flood deposit was cased by a flood? What sort of a question is that? Of course they agree that it is a flood deposit. We do not have a lot of information about the world and the people God destroyed. He does not give us a lot of information. Only we are told: "Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."A picture is evidence for the flood?
Do professional geologists agree with you?
I would imagine they have gone the way of all skeletons. They are chalk or limestone.Where are the human skeletons from the flood?
I have been asking for years: a picture is evidence for evolution? That is pretty much the way scientific evidence is. The excavation was done almost 100 years ago. They did not have digital cameras back then. They can not go into that area now, it is a war zone and to dangerous to take students into do the work. Every now and then you see photos of soldiers standing in front of a ancient site. If you look at the remains of the buildings you will see they have a raised foundation which is usually to protect the building from floods.A picture is evidence for the flood?
Last 10 years discovery from fossils finds in China shows that evolution is just a theory!
View attachment 164973
There are no evidence for macro-evolution! It is only micro-evolution all the way!
It's gotten to the point now, where I don't know, what threads are sincere, which ones are satire.
I have been asking for years: a picture is evidence for evolution? That is pretty much the way scientific evidence is. The excavation was done almost 100 years ago. They did not have digital cameras back then. They can not go into that area now, it is a war zone and to dangerous to take students into do the work. Every now and then you see photos of soldiers standing in front of a ancient site. If you look at the remains of the buildings you will see they have a raised foundation which is usually to protect the building from floods.
Does a geologist agree that a flood deposit was cased by a flood? What sort of a question is that? Of course they agree that it is a flood deposit. We do not have a lot of information about the world and the people God destroyed. He does not give us a lot of information. Only we are told: "Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?