• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution is a RELIGION and not Science

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Isn't micro-evolution as contrary to genesis as macro-evolution? I can link you to several ewxamples of speciation, i,e. dog+dog=cat.

Micro-evolution is not contrary to genesis. The Bible speaks of created kinds. The issue is with the vehicle for the initial creation. Creationists and scripture says God created everything directly. Theistic evolutionists say God used mutations and selection (survival of the fittest) over millions of years as the process.

Theistic evolution cannot be reconciled with scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
Well, there's a list of transitionals for you, heres a list of observed speciation. Observed Instances of Speciation
 
Upvote 0

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,429
3,835
Moe's Tavern
✟200,676.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian

you seem to be under the impression that time and majority consensus implies credibility. you realize people have believed in things that have turned out to be wrong for much longer than 200 years.


there's a very good joke that has a lot of truth in it:

if a frog turns into a man its called a fairytale.
if a frog turns into a man over millions of years its called evolution.

if you tell someone they evolved from primordial soup 100 years ago they would laugh at you.
even if you said 1000 years ago they would still find it hard to believe you.
but if you tell them they evolved over millions of years they probably would believe that.

it seems time is evolutions ultimate hero

and no I don't think its a conspiracy. just a small group of people with an agenda and a very loud voice screaming over anyone who doesn't agree with them.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Time eliminates the element of faith. People have no conception of time and can be led to believe just about anything can happen over time no matter how much the odds are against it.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

You can tell this is a reptile-bird from this imprint in a rock?

As for genetics revealing relationships among species, could it not also reveal a common creator?
 
Upvote 0

CabVet

Question everything
Dec 7, 2011
11,738
176
Los Altos, CA
✟35,902.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You can tell this is a reptile-bird from this imprint in a rock?

As for genetics revealing relationships among species, could it not also reveal a common creator?

Yes, this is an exceptionally well-preserved fossil, and yes, we can tell it has characteristics of both reptiles and birds. And no, relationships among species don't indicate a common creator, they indicate common descent, very different.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Thank you for your heart felt concern for my welfare.
 
Upvote 0

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,429
3,835
Moe's Tavern
✟200,676.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
And no, relationships among species don't indicate a common creator, they indicate common descent, very different.

do you know this or do you think this? if you know this, how do you know this?

all you've said is this fossil has some reptile parts and some bird parts therefore this fossil must be the middle man between reptile and birds. that sounds more like wishful thinking.

here's a thought, what if this fossil isn't a transitional fossil at all?
 
Upvote 0

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
Explain why God would create intermediate species that are now exxtinct?
 
Upvote 0

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,429
3,835
Moe's Tavern
✟200,676.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Explain why God would create intermediate species that are now exxtinct?

your question makes no sense. your question has a built in assumption that evolution has occurred and that there are such things as intermediate species.

its like asking someone "why are elephants pink?"
well, elephants aren't pink. that question assumes they are pink, it has a built in assumption.

which is all the theory of evolution is anyway. an assumption based on another assumption.
 
Upvote 0

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
Um, but unlike pink elephants, we can see archaeopteryx... explain the existance of it and other allegedly transitional fossils according to Creationism?
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Micro-evolution is not contrary to genesis. The Bible speaks of created kinds.

If I were to give you a list of, say, 15 beings, could you tell me what kind they belong/belonged to, and why or why they were not related to the other beings on the list via common ancestry?
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
there's a very good joke that has a lot of truth in it:

if a frog turns into a man its called a fairytale.
if a frog turns into a man over millions of years its called evolution.

There's absolutely no truth in it.

Do you know why?
 
Upvote 0

Psudopod

Godspeed, Spacebat
Apr 11, 2006
3,015
164
Bath
✟26,638.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
In Relationship

So why do we only find these creatures in the historical and geological location between the two creatures it appears to be tranistional. Why would a creature sharing the morphology of reptiles and birds only exist before modern birds, but after reptiles and in the same habitat that both of them lived in?
 
Upvote 0

Blackwater Babe

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
7,093
246
United States
✟8,940.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Libertarian
*raises hand* they're about to tell you scientific dating is wrong too?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,294
52,679
Guam
✟5,164,000.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
it seems time is evolutions ultimate hero
Indeed -- qv my four Biblical reasons against evolution please:
 
Upvote 0