• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolution is a Lie

Status
Not open for further replies.

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
This assumes we prayed to a jug of milk before. Have you?

You have no idea all the things I prayed to on my search for God when I started losing my faith. Sadly, I got the same response from all of them.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What "first Lifeform" are you referring to? I never said anything about a First Lifeform and you never asked for one.
Are you saying you do not accept the first lifeform that so called science talks about like a best bud? I don't blame you from trying to distance yourself from that.


Um, no I'm not. Again, this is the first I've heard you mention any "first Lifeform" and not what the discussion was about.
It is part of what is commonly known as evolution. Get off the high horse.
 
Upvote 0

Darkeonz

Newbie
Mar 15, 2011
156
3
42
✟22,801.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Evolution is real. The problem here is really the word theory. The common use of the word is just an idea of what might have happened. Like a hunch or a guess. But in science a theory isn't that. This video will explain it better then i can

YouTube - What the "Theory" in Theory of Evolution means


Evolution has nothing to do with how life originated. It has only to do with the changes in animals. Saying the Evolution doesn't exist would be like saying Gravity doesn't exist. It is confirmed that there are evolutionary changes in animals.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,604
52,510
Guam
✟5,127,865.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why? A lot of small changes in animals will over time when accumilated, become big changes in animals. It's pretty simple
Key words: over time.

But time itself has only been in operation for some 6100 years.
 
Upvote 0

Darkeonz

Newbie
Mar 15, 2011
156
3
42
✟22,801.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Key words: over time.

But time itself has only been in operation for some 6100 years.

Actually the earth is 4.6 billion years old. I suggest the following site, if you want to learn more about how they determined that the earth is this old

The Age of the Earth

A big percentage of christians accept that the earth is not 6100 years old.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
What does that mean? I don't understand your comment

It means he's a little off today. He's usually better with this word twisting but they just seem to be falling flatly into nonsense without the usual sting of his wit.
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟23,498.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
But, Neanderthals and Cro-magna weren't humans so........ What was your point again?
I protest. They were humans. (Crô-Magnons were actually Homo sapiens!)

But really, once you leave the comfortable confines of our one species, what is or isn't a "human" becomes a pointless semantic game. It's like arguing whether teal is a kind of blue or a kind of green.

Evolution has nothing to do with how life originated. It has only to do with the changes in animals.
The rest of the living world is now deeply offended ;)
 
Upvote 0

DrkSdBls

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2006
1,721
56
43
✟2,298.00
Faith
Seeker
Are you saying you do not accept the first lifeform that so called science talks about like a best bud? I don't blame you from trying to distance yourself from that.

If by "First Life form" you mean the first complex Structure that can be defined as Life, then I claim Ignorance. It's out of my area of Knowledge. Indeed, the Definition of "Life" becomes something of a Paradox the further back we go beyond that point.

But when discussing Evolution of Life today and in the recent past (few million years Recent that is) there is no confusion as to the nature of How life Evolves.


It is part of what is commonly known as evolution. Get off the high horse.
Only so far as such a form of Life had the ability to reproduce itself.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DrkSdBls

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2006
1,721
56
43
✟2,298.00
Faith
Seeker
I protest. They were humans. (Crô-Magnons were actually Homo sapiens!)

But really, once you leave the comfortable confines of our one species, what is or isn't a "human" becomes a pointless semantic game. It's like arguing whether teal is a kind of blue or a kind of green.

Yeah, I realized I fell into that pit as soon as I typed it but the point (as far as AV's concerned) remains the same.

Besides, I don't really feel the Need to be completely Accurate or serious when discussing anything with AV or dad. I reserve that Privilege for someone who's not a Blatant Poe. Only reason I'm humoring them is cause I'm bored.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.