Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Forget predictions --- what about discoveries?If science predicts something, then that prediction was wrong, then that's not gonna falsify the whole theory, unless it was something seriously major.
Forget predictions --- what about discoveries?
What about Hesperopithecus haroldcookii ?
Was he not hailed as an important scientific discovery?
What about C[sub]13[/sub]H[sub]10[/sub]N[sub]2[/sub]O[sub]4[/sub] ?
What about Phlogiston Theory?
What about...
The theory is adapted.
Seriously, you still don't seem to understand the fact that science never claims to be infallible. When it is wrong, it admits it and changes the theory to fit the new data. A few mistakes does not disprove the overwhelming positive evidences that AREN'T mistakes.
Evolution runs on the No True Scotsman Principle: if it's right, it's evolution; if it's wrong, it's not evolution.
Because of that, you can almost predict what they are going to say in response.
You might not like or appreciate the truth, but that doesn't change the truth or make it go away. It would be an impossible task to refute it.
No it was not. Only by the Illustrated London News, which was trying to sell papers. Even the discoverer, Henry Fairfield Osborn called the artist's drawing accompanying the article, " a figment of the imagination of no scientific value, and undoubtedly inaccurate". You will never see a creationist website mention that, will we, AVET? Why is that? Also, I asked before, is there a reason you people have to go back to 1922 to come up with "one of many examples" of how science gets everything wrong?Forget predictions --- what about discoveries?
What about Hesperopithecus haroldcookii ?
Was he not hailed as an important scientific discovery?
How many times a year is this drug issued to pregnant women today? Now compare that number to the number of creationist websites and creationists here that continue to lie about Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.What about C[sub]13[/sub]H[sub]10[/sub]N[sub]2[/sub]O[sub]4[/sub] ?
Wooo.. now you are going back even further than 1922!What about Phlogiston Theory?
What about...
The theory is adapted.
Seriously, you still don't seem to understand the fact that science never claims to be infallible. When it is wrong, it admits it and changes the theory to fit the new data. A few mistakes does not disprove the overwhelming positive evidences that AREN'T mistakes.
Forget predictions --- what about discoveries?
What about Hesperopithecus haroldcookii ?
Was he not hailed as an important scientific discovery?
What about C[sub]13[/sub]H[sub]10[/sub]N[sub]2[/sub]O[sub]4[/sub] ?
What about Phlogiston Theory?
What about...
You got it, macro-evolution. I bolded part of your statement to clarify where I stand .
I mentioned in one of my posts that I recently read an article about a tooth being fabricated into a wonderful discovery for an evolutionist until a jawbone was discovered that ruined the illusion. I was challenged to produce that article, so here it is:
Exposing the Evolutionists Sleight-of-Hand With the Fossil Record
{snip}
You'll notice pretty quickly that I did read exactly what I said that I did. The tooth did stand as a great evolutionary discovery for 20 years until a jawbone was discovered that debunked the fraud.
Bold mine. So it wasn't "a tooth", it was jaw and teeth fragments. I notice that Fred also fails to mention that the finds were first discovered in 1932, but didn't gain traction until the 1960s. Also the Britannica article Fred cites makes no mention of it being displayed in museums across the country.For more than 20 years Ramapithecus was proudly displayed in museums across the country as mans first direct ancestor, based entirely on jaw and teeth fragments!14 When a complete jaw was found, evolutionists where forced to admit that it was actually a relative of the orangutan!
You can read about many other gross errors and frauds by evolutionists in this article, so read it carefully. When you finish this article, please go back to the main site and read some more. The site is appropriately named and does much to expose the gross errors, imaginative fabrications, frauds and hoaxes of evolutionists.
Many people prefer truth over fairy tales.
Probably the same thing you are: nothing.So -- what are you looking to falsify?
I have a question too evolutionists....how is it possible to find authentic artifacts of thousands of years old that shows that dinosaurs were part of their culture/man?
I am pretty sure they did not have the science and imagination of that of modern evolutionists......
Ooparts & Ancient High Technology--Evidence of Noah's Flood?-Literature, Art & History Crawling with Dinosaurs
This really makes evolution look stupid!
So basically, reliable source or we continue laughing.We have a Biblical viewpoint on the world. Ooparts are evidence, we think, that the Flood actually happened.
I have a question too evolutionists....how is it possible to find authentic artifacts of thousands of years old that shows that dinosaurs were part of their culture/man?
I am pretty sure they did not have the science and imagination of that of modern evolutionists......
Ooparts & Ancient High Technology--Evidence of Noah's Flood?-Literature, Art & History Crawling with Dinosaurs
This really makes evolution look stupid!
I'll take your word for it.Just knowing you exist makes me feel, on average, a lot more intelligent than I actually am...
I'll take your word for it.
Speaking of intelligence, if a dinosaur had a navel, would that disprove evolution?
I know it runs on the No True Scotsman Principle, but at least, by definition, would it disprove it.
Or would the goalpost just be moved?
Then you'd better start rethinking:Any reptile that's born from an egg, and has a navel would cause a re-think, at the very least.
Going into denial might help too --- just pretend it isn't a dinosaur.Job 40:16 said:Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
Sounds tempting, but God gets the glory.You'd be remembered through history, just as Galileo, Einstein or Darwin are, now.
Wooooooooooooooooooooooow
Really?
Let's start this off on the right foot, first two sentences of the home page.
So basically, reliable source or we continue laughing.
And secondly, are ancient peoples not allowed to be creative and fanciful? I suppose since the Greeks wrote about them and drew them then Griffins must exist (or have existed) as well. I suppose that if one decides to enlarge a lizard or serpent to epic proportions it could not possibly be creative liberty, the Chinese must have actually encountered giant flying limbed serpents.
Hahahahahahahahaha, how refreshing, people of 2000 years ago includes dinosaurs in their art, I guess they saw the dinosaurs on National Geographic?But what is interesting is that the dino fossils found in that area is the same as the dinos on the artifacts, so much for creativity.....
Evolution is a fact?
Hahahahahahahahaha, how refreshing, people of 2000 years ago includes dinosaurs in their art, I guess they saw the dinosaurs on National Geographic?But what is interesting is that the dino fossils found in that area is the same as the dinos on the artifacts, so much for creativity.....
Evolution is a fact?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?