Evolution happens

[AV1611VET]

They're using the term "cosmic evolution" to distinguish those processes from biologic evolution.

Yupper.

Just like Harvard does.

They're not in any way related to biologic evolution.

That is correct.

In fact, I'd like to remind people that "evolution" is a common word in our language and doesn't just refer to biologic evolution.

That is correct.

I've been saying that all along.

You can have all sorts of different kinds of evolution.

Yup.

Here they are again:

1. particulate
2. galactic
3. stellar
4. planetary
5. chemical
6. biological
7. cultural
8. future

All under the umbrella of COSMIC EVOLUTION.

 

[AV1611VET]

What has cosmic evolution got to do with evolution in biology?

The same thing ACT VI has in a PLAY.

A PLAY consisting of eight acts has ACT VI as its sixth act.

COSMIC EVOLUTION consisting of eight stages has BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION as its sixth stage.

 

[sjastro]

The same thing ACT VI has in a PLAY.

A PLAY consisting of eight acts has ACT VI as its sixth act.

COSMIC EVOLUTION consisting of eight stages has BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION as its sixth stage.

Were you hit over the head by a double pendulum and ignored the rest of my post?
Where does chaotic evolution fit in the scheme of things?

 

[AV1611VET]

Were you hit over the head by a double pendulum and ignored the rest of my post?
Where does chaotic evolution fit in the scheme of things?

Ask Harvard.

(Or will they answer you?)

And speaking of chaotic, have you seen: My Tilt-a-Whirl Challenge

 

[Yttrium]

All under the umbrella of COSMIC EVOLUTION.

Aggh. No.

The various types of cosmic evolution are limited to the astrophysics stuff. And even they include things that aren't directly connected to each other.

 

[Think...]

... evolution is a fact ...

Evolution is absolutely not a fact and has never been proven.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Evolution is absolutely not a fact and has never been proven.

It has been proven and it is a fact.

 

[Think...]

... from a scientific standpoint, Creationism has no basis as fact. It's not science.

It's certainly not "science falsely so called" as Paul refers to it.
1 Timothy 6:20 KJV

True Science, that of honest Christians, never supported evolution THEORY.

 

[Think...]

It has been proven and it is a fact.

Do share.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It's certainly not "science falsely so called" as Paul refers to it.
1 Timothy 6:20 KJV

True Science, that of honest Christians, never supported evolution THEORY.

Yeah, creationism is false science since it works with a conclusion and works backwards.

And I love that all you're doing is showing that you have no idea what you're arguing about since you would know that the word theory doesn't just mean 'an idea' when used in science.

11 posts and you're really coming in swinging, aren't you?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Do share.

Evidence for evolution

Have a read through that. It's not too long but is easy to understand and also uses pictures to illustrate points made, so it should be easy for anyone to understand.

 

[AV1611VET]

The various types of cosmic evolution are limited to the astrophysics stuff. And even they include things that aren't directly connected to each other.

Tell that to Harvard.

(Or will they put you in your place?)

 

[Mr Laurier]

Evolution is absolutely not a fact and has never been proven.

Evolution has been repeatedly observed by countless people over centuries.

 

[sjastro]

Ask Harvard.

(Or will they answer you?)

And speaking of chaotic, have you seen: My Tilt-a-Whirl Challenge

I'm asking you where does chaotic evolution fit in the scheme of things.

Why for example does the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg algorithm for long term predictions of planetary orbits eventually fail?

​

 

[AV1611VET]

Evolution has been repeatedly observed by countless people over centuries.

Ya ... dogs having dogs, horses having horses, rabbits having rabbits, giraffes having giraffes ...

 

[Ophiolite]

Evolution is absolutely not a fact and has never been proven.

We have observed evolution on so many occassions that calling them countless is, on a practical level, barely an exaggeration.
It is interesting that you choose to ignore the validated research of tens of thousands of dedicated individuals, many of whom are Christians, that have confirmed both generalities and details of evolution by a score or more disciplines.
Why does the reality of evolution and the effectiveness of evolutionary theory make you so uncomfortable? You seem to perceive it as a threat. That is also interesting.

True Science, that of honest Christians, never supported evolution THEORY.

I notice you are new here. This statement of yours seems to come very close to breaking one of the forum rules. Indeed, I think it breaks the spirit of that rule. You are not allowed to say that any member who identifies as a Christian is not a real Christian. Your reference to "honest Christians" seems to place you at, or over the line. Just something for you to reflect on.

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm asking you where does chaotic evolution fit in the scheme of things.

Why for example does the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg algorithm for long term predictions of planetary orbits eventually fail?

​

tl;dr

 

[Ophiolite]

tl;dr

rm;kp'.22;df

 

[Think...]

Yeah, creationism is false science since it works with a conclusion and works backwards.

And I love that all you're doing is showing that you have no idea what you're arguing about since you would know that the word theory doesn't just mean 'an idea' when used in science.

11 posts and you're really coming in swinging, aren't you?

Is there a rule here that I must have a specific number of posts before I can post the type of comments that I've posted, which were simply matter-of-fact statements in disagreement with your matter-of-fact statements, or are you personally offended that anyone could disagree with you?

Speaking of false science, what kind of science is it when you have no proof of a theory and you carry it forth into the world as if it were proven fact? What kind of science is that?

As far as my ignorance of the definition of 'theory'?

the·o·ry
/ˈTHirē/noun

1. a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
   "Darwin's theory of evolution"

theory definition - Google Search

Isn't that funny? Hmmm. Even Google uses it as an example of the definition.

Wow.

 

[sjastro]

tl;dr

Translation:

​

The question of evolution of chaotic systems is beyond your level of comprehension.